Tests Are For Students-Not Animals Animal testing; appealing or atrocious? Each year, more than 100 million animals are experimented on and killed in laboratories for medicinal training, classroom lessons, and chemical, drug, food, and cosmetics testing. Animals are not objects. Many Americans fight over the pros and cons of this two-sided argument. Although animal testing may further advance the medical field, scientific experimentation on animals is unfavorable among a large portion of the American population because these creatures are imperfect analogs for the human body, the process is wasteful in terms of money and the lives of the creatures, and the testing of innocent, guileless animals is now considered archaic by most. Animals are capable of experiencing fear, pain, and worry. Although certain animals are significantly similar to humans, they are completely different creatures in terms of being considered something to test on. Paul Furlong, Professor of Clinical Neuroimaging at Aston University states in an article published by procon.org, “It's very hard to create an animal model that even equates closely to what we're trying to achieve in the human." The website continues to says, “Animals are very different from human beings and therefore make poor test subjects. The anatomic, metabolic, and cellular differences between animals and people make animals poor models for human beings.” Since animals that are experimented on have a different bodily
Animal testing has been going on for years; however, few question the ethics of testing medicines that would cure human diseases on animals. Various animals being tested in labs and cruelly force them to be a host of harmful diseases negatively affect their health. Animal testing is cruel and unusual punishment and should discontinue. Animal experimentation is a subject that many know of but don’t know much about. Although it is a big topic, people still don’t pay much attention to it because of their lack of information. Experimenting is a cruel process that causes many innocent animals to suffer. Many cases of violations towards experimenting have been found as well. Testing on animals is unnecessary when laying down the
“Given the climate of poor regulatory oversight, many animals are also abused, neglected, and harmed in ways that violate the law”( “Animal Testing and the Law” ) , revealing the horrific underlying effect of animal testing that society does not want to display to the public. Not to mention, many animals are unprotected by the law and forced against their will to undergo a horrid experience—“legal tests include burning, poisoning, mutilating…, and dissecting without painkillers”( “Animal Testing and the Law” ). Many animals are caged behind closed doors that the public cannot see because scientists who use these techniques do not want to upset the public; however, the law is not forcefully used to protect animals in a harmful environment. Furthermore, animals have no voice to establish a strong faith for their future; humans determine the fate and well-being of the animals. Animal Welfare Act, a Federal law that addresses the standard of care animals receive at research facilities, excludes about 95 percent of animals used in research and has low protection for the rest ( “ Animal Testing and the Law” ). Precious animals used in experimental research should be protected fully, if animals are going to be used, otherwise animal testing should be banned if the laws cannot fulfill their duty of protection because of the horrible experiments that may take place. “M.A. Fox
Animal Testing is a enormous upset in the word today. Animal activist have been trying to put an end to it for years , but to no avail. Animal testing is when scientist will use animals to do experiments on . They will either hook heavy machinery to these poor defenseless animals or inject them with harsh chemicals just to see if its okay for human use. Over 26 millions of animals are used every year in just the united states alone for these cruel acts by the hand of man. Testing on animals have increased the development of many of life-saving treatments for both human and animals , but at what cost. Its said that 100 million animals die every year .
Almost every medicine that can be found in an average person’s medicine cabinet has been tested on an animal at one point or another. A government funded corporation called the Food and Drug Administration, abbreviated as the FDA, is in charge of making sure that all drugs, cosmetics, biological products, and more are efficient, secure, and safe for human usage. The FDA will not allow any drug to be released or sold to the human population if it has not first been tested on animals. In fact, when a drug is first created it is tested on animals before humans are even allowed to test the drug at clinical trial centers. Whether or not animal testing should be done for scientific purposes, has been a widely argued topic for many years
In the United States alone, notably around 100 million animals die every year from lab testing, including the larger animals like dogs and cats, along with rodents. With animal testing being on the rise, it is called out for being an unethical form of science. There are scientists and pro animal rights activists constantly on the search to reduce the number of animals involved in animal testing. They are trying to find alternatives to help layout a better blueprint for the science world, even if some alternatives are more profound than others. However, with their search, there are different types of lab testing that are used in an attempt to make animal testing more humane, and trying to pass laws that limit the use of animals in testing,
Around the world, there has been an enduring controversial issue and that is animal testing and research. Since the beginning of medicine, animals were used in the testing of drugs, vaccines, and medical devices to determine the safety of a product due to their similarities in diseases with humans. However this is considered unnecessary due to the creation of alternatives for animal testing. Despite these alternatives the majority of animal testing still has not come to halt. This issue deserves to be attentive to instead of turning a blind eye as we consumers have always done dragging the issue and understand how our products are developed. The audience for this topic is generally people who are consumers of products and UTA students. In
Scientists have found multiple alternatives to animal testing, but companies still choose to use it. Countries around the world are starting to stand up against cosmetic animal testing by banning products that have been tested on animals from being sold. The harm done to the innocent animals that end up in the laboratories is cruel, yet women, men, and children still buy and support companies that hurt harmless creatures for their own development. Eventually our country will catch up to the others who have stood up for the animals that were unable to stand up for themselves. More and more companies are starting to become cruelty free on their own; many of them being independent brands that have started because of their strong feelings against animal cruelty. Bigger brands like Bare Minerals, E.L.F Cosmetics, Tarte Cosmetics, and so many more are taking a stand against animal cruelty. Someday I hope all cosmetic companies are like this. Cosmetic animal testing is inhumane, inaccurate, and should be completely banned from the United States.
You are in Sephora and the most beautiful eyeshadow is there, but notice it is one of the many brands that test on animals. You keep picturing the poor bunnies, kittens and puppies stuffed in cages starving or force-feed to so much they cannot move. The sadness in their eyes, the multiple surgeries and tests they must go through on a daily basis. Animal testing is not, but should be a banned form of commercial and scientific testing. In a world as advanced as ours, animals should no longer be the test subject because it is no longer an ideal method. There are countless other effective methods of testing these products that do not involve harming anything. The animals chosen for the testing are all-around different from the human species. The use of animals costs much more than its equally effective counterparts. Testing harmful products on helpless animals is inhumane and cruel.
Throughout the years, controversial topics such as animal testing have morphed into a variety of different questions. Scientists are always coming up with new topics to debate. Many people often overlook the effects of animal testing. This has been going on for decades since many are unaware of the results and the damages animal testing can cause. However, as time progresses, more people are becoming more informed about this and taking it into action. Animal testing is cruel and inhumane since many innocent animals’ lives are being taken due to our selfish needs. During 2000-2010, scholars argued that animal testing can be reduced or improved in other ways rather than eliminated completely. Although, from 2010 and on that conversation has changed to whether or not computer programming could work as a permanent alternative since there was research that proved this experiment to be valid. Such as, in vivo testing, which literally means ‘in glass’ experimentations that does not require animals at all.
Animals are not made to be brutally burned or blinded and brain damaged daily. Cosmetic testing is not a bad thing when it comes to science, but it is morally wrong. There are 92% of products, that are tested on animals, that fail because they are deemed too dangerous for human use (“11 Facts About Animal Testing”). Cosmetic products should not be tested on animals due to the long-term negative medical effects, alternatives for such testing exists, and there is an abundance of cruelty free products that can be used.
I believe that we should not be allowed to continue animal testing. I will provide examples of three different of the four Ethic theories we have learned which include Feminism (ethics of care), Utilitarianism, and Deontology. My main focuses include animal testing dealing with Medicine, and animal testing in cosmetics.
it's a constant race to discover the next big medical break or scientific discovery where often times an animal was used, without the use of animal testing we wouldn’t of been able to discover the things we have because there’s no alternative to animal testing because nothing is closer in DNA and of the living life form.
Each year over 100 million animals are abused and tortured by US labs. There must be an elimination of this testing because it is inhumane to treat animals in that manner, there is also different methods of testing products that don't involve animals, and lastly, many countries around the world already have taken the giant step in eliminating the testing.
As former events show, man has sustained and overcome countless diseases and infections. Some of these diseases have caused many people to suffer in pain and even lead to death. Though, many of these diseases have been cured due to humanity medical experiments. Medical research has improved people’s lives increasing life expectancy greatly. These medical breakthroughs have helped mankind in many ways, but in order to achieve these advances in medicine many animals have paid the price by suffering through experimentation. Medical researchers study animals to get a better understanding the comparison between the human and animal bodies.
When we go out with friends, or we straighten up our house for our guests, we don't stop to think about all the products that we use and the animal lives that are taken just for the products to be put on the shelves. Frankly, we are not losing anything but our money when we purchase the products, whether it be hair products, cleaning products, body products, or makeup products, but for these to even be put on the shelves for our liking, animals are punished, killed and tormented to their absolute death. Animal testing is also used for finding ways to cure human diseases and finding cures for illnesses. For centuries now, the ethics and processes of animal testing has alway been questioned. Prevention is needed because animal testing is not always reliable for human health. “The National Institutes of Health (NIH) has noted that ninety-five percent of all drugs are shown to be safe and effective in animal tests fail in human trials because they don’t work or are dangerous” (Animal testing). Humans don’t always want animals to be put on the same pedestal as animals.