Introduction
The review is about the article What Panasonic Learned in China written by Wakayama Toshiro, Shintaku Junjiro and Amano Tomofumi. Harvard Business Review. Dec2012, Vol. 90 Issue 12, p109-113. The article focuses on how Panasonic in China learned to bridge two strategies that are often mutually exclusive: localization and integration.
The founder of Panasonic was asked by the Chinese leader Deng Xiaoping to help modernizing China’s industries. Panasonic began licensing technologies to China which led to more than 40 China-based manufacturing operations. Panasonic’s first main purpose was to take advantage of low manufacturing costs and exporting the output.
In Japan, Panasonic invested a Lifestyle Research Center to
…show more content…
On the other hand, China subsidiaries have almost complete authority to make decisions on introductions for new products in the local market. They are focusing on meeting local consumers particular needs.
This article shows us how Panasonic strategically handled the outpacing competitors in China by bridging localization and integration. By combining these two strategies Panasonic began to think globally and act local. By establishing a Lifestyle Research Center in China, they embraced the tension between cross-border integration and local adaptation. In order to develop overseas business, Panasonic held firmly to the idea of ‘contributing to the development of the country’ by acting as a public entity and becoming a company welcomed by the country. What we have experienced in real life situations is that we have to give the consumers a good feeling. Like what you do when you are having a sales talk, you want your clients to have a good feeling about you and you have to provide them complete information so they can trust you. Panasonic handled that way which was their source to success.
The authors probably wanted us to inform that Panasonic’s approach in engaging markets is a strong advantage in their business field. Competitiveness will be determined not just by the localization of sales and production but also by the
International marketing or business is uniquely different from the local market because the product price, place and promotion is vastly different from what is been offered to local customers (Johansson, 2000) With the emergence of the information technology, cross border marketing has never been a distant dream. However, it has never been easier even for giant multinational companies to face challenges that come in international business. The biggest challenge comes from the culture which varies from country to country.
At the Global Breakthrough and Expansion phase, expansion to new markets and increased pres-ence to existing markets continues with globalization degree 25-50% and sales in three continents (Gabrielsson & Gabrielsson, 2009b). As the firm matures and with the new fear of losing overseas markets, they establish their own sales office in the form of foreign direct investment in addition to relying on exports and partners (Hashimoto 2011, p.27). With the drive to achieve global break-through, firms will start to take on distant and challenging new markets thus coming across difficul-ties in cultural, legal, and localization aspects (Rönkkö et al., 2008).
A Multicountry approach is one in which as organization’s strategies vary according to the countries in which it does business (Coulter, 2013, p.202). This approach is centered on creating an advantage through differentiation. The products, marketing, and distribution are tailored and adopted to local culture and customs. Such local responsiveness is important when significant country to country differences exist (Coulter, 2013, p.203). An example of this would be McDonald’s Corporation. To appeal to the local customers’ palates in Singapore, they added rice burgers – fried beef slices served between two pressed rice cakes, to its menu.
Philips and Matsushita are two electronic (equipment and service) based powerhouses who had to expand their business to the international market. One my ask why they needed to operate internationally… each company, Philips and Matsushita, wanted to stand in front of their peer companies as the market leader in the industry. In order to do this, each company would go through various changes, some of which hurt and some of which
This is an international marketing strategy that largely focuses on the commercial efforts and advertising on the benefits of concentrating on local markets rather than using global or universal approach. This, therefore, means that the company will employ work towards understanding culture of different local markets in various countries and try to enter into the studied market using the demographics in that area. The greatest effort required in this strategy is using advertising as well presentation to try and appease local sensibilities in various countries rather than applying a mass market strategy. So that this strategy can be successful it is crucial to carry out extensive research in different countries that the company hopes to invest (Leontiades, 2010). By learning how the company can be able to create a good connection with the consumers in various countries using multi-domestic strategy can assist to build a lot of tactics which can be integrated into markets that have many similarities. Learning how to closely associate with customers will also assist customize marketing and advertising efforts to match with the present local culture. Although multi-domestic strategy may be somehow expensive to employ its end result are more profitable to the company. When the company’s products are able to
The focus of this case study is on the Vizio company and market for flat-panel TVs. However, most importantly Vizio’s unique use of globalization of production which gave them a competitive advantage in the market just as it was peaking. I found it important to do some research on the Vizio company to get a solid understanding of their background and history. The unique blend of origin, ethnicity and country of residence through much of his youth may have played a strong role in CEO, William Wang’s success with globalization. What started as a consultant business in 2002, later helped Gateway launch the first flat-panel TV under $3K and then Vizio found a niche in the flat-panel TV market which set them apart from their
Matsushita did this by closing its fax machine factory in Germany, and closing its microwave oven subsidiary and air-compressor factory in the U.S. Matsushita also asked for more than 10,000 Japanese employees in its manufacturing sector to retire early and all of these closed businesses and cancelled job positions were moved to China. Matsushita’s establishing of the new “brain” in China, or Matsushita Electric R&D Center in Beijing, China, was the company’s second largest of 16 R&D centers around the world. Matsushita’s chairman, Yoichi Morishita said “it was too difficult to explain everything about China to Japanese designers; to really make use of China’s special competitive advantages and to really meet Chinese customers’ demands, Matsushita decided to hand over its China-related development and research issues to local researchers and engineers.” Matsushita decided to localize material supplies and use as many Chinese suppliers as possible for its operations in China because there are several material distribution and trade centers in China that provide steel, paint, hardware, etc. all functioning with a mechanism similar to that of the polystyrene distribution and trade centers. The fourth fundamental change in Matsushita’s new supply chain, Stretch the distribution link, Matsushita selected TCL, the largest TV producer in China, as its strategic partner to stretch its supply chain to Chinese rural and inland markets. With
Royal Philips NV and Matsushita (owner of the Panasonic brand among others) are two of the world’s biggest electronics multinationals. After successfully building their global empires in the early twentieth century, they have both suffered financially in recent decades. It is therefore interesting to look at why this has happened and what their future prospects are.
On being operational in the global market, Samsung has been subjected to various kinds of pressure. Therefore, the focus of this report is show while formulating an international strategy how Samsung should take both environment factors into consideration that will shape their business approach. The analytical business tools namely PESTLE and Porter Five Forces will be used to understand the micro and macro environment drivers of Samsung’s strategy.
In China the company has the advantage of the product itself being made according to the Chinese standards for quality, however, the big challenge is facing liabilities of foreignness and outsidership.
The literature on international marketing presents a confrontation between two mainstream schools of thought regarding international marketing. The one supports the standardization approach and argues that multinational companies’ behavior should be uniform to minimize total costs and promote a global corporate image. The other argues for the need for adaptation to fit the unique dimensions of each local market. This research investigates companies’ practical level of adaptation and standardization in international markets. It identifies
In contrast to Philips, Matsushita’s success stems from highly efficient and centralized operations. Also unlike Philips, Matsushita’s numerous domestic retail outlets in Japan are ideal for the sale and distribution of their products and provide valuable market research opportunities and capabilities. Both the structure and culture at Matsushita encourage an entrepreneurial drive in their employees and divisions, as they compete for funds to develop new products, and extraordinary communication exists between the international operations and the home office in Japan.
A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF BUSINESS STRATEGIES BETWEEN KOREA AND JAPAN: A CASE OF ELECTRONICS ITEMS BETWEEN SAMSUNG AND SONY CHOONG Y. LEE * *Daniel Froes Batata, Ha Sook Kim, Gladys A. Kelce College of Business, Pittsburg State University, Pittsburg, KS 66762, U.S.A. ABSTRACT Sony, one of the world‟s most prominent companies in the electronics industry from Japan, has dominated the markets from all over the world for a long time since 1970s. Over the last decade, however, it has faced challenges to maintain its growth. Although sales levels have been relatively steady over the last decade, its profitability has gone from approximately eight to almost zero percent in 2009. Concomitantly, Samsung Electronics from Korea has successfully overcome
Samsung is a Seoul-based electronics company that deals with television sets, cameras, personal computer items, print solutions, cell phones, home appliances and other accessories. Having been started in 1938 as a Korean export business, it has grown to be one of the leading multinationals. The multinational company’s vision is to "Inspire the World, Create the Future." (Samsung, 2013). The company’s philosophy is “to devote our talent and technology to creating superior products and services that contribute to a better global society” while its core values are people, change, excellence, co-prosperity and integrity. The company
The Haier Group Corporation is a Chinese multinational company operating in the home appliances and consumer electronics industries. The firm, founded in 1984 as Qingdao Refrigerator Co., thrived under the lead of CEO Zhang Ruimin and in 2004 was ranked China’s number-one company, with sales topping RMB 100 million. I maintain two specific market advantages that defined Haier’s success in China, namely market responsiveness and customer centricity, were key in shaping the company’s international strategy and in aiding its success on a global level. This essay will articulate how the capabilities developed by Haier while operating in their domestic market, can facilitate the company’s global expansion, and how Haier’s market driven culture of innovation and forward-looking leadership contribute to the international