Resistance (R-E) Before Resistance

The principles of resistance training and lifting techniques are the key to minimize the risk of injury and increase performance. To avoid injury and obtain maximum benefits from each exercise session, athletes must follow the safety guidelines of weightlifting. Before each workout session, athletes need to warm-up properly, 5 to 10 minutes of dynamic exercises, such as walking or light jogging to increase body temperature and prepare muscles, ligaments, and tendons for vigorous movements. Then, they need to perform stretching exercises for at least 5 minutes to prevent muscle pulls, strains, and sprains. At the end of each exercise session, they need to perform cool- down exercises to help the body to slowly return to a resting state. The

I have organized the client’s training program with the major muscles first in the program after that I would repeat the muscles again. In addition, since the client had requested for 6 resistance training days I have strategized by splitting the major muscle groups into several days as seen in the client’s program. Furthermore, with having 6 days of resistance training it would be tough but with a mixture of upper and lower body days it would allow the client to recovery and build the muscles. Not only, he would be build muscles, he would improve in his speedball games.

There were 24 men and 16 women who were physically active to participate in the study. The participants were asked to not complete any exhaustive exercise 48 hours prior to the session. To assess strength,

Concurrent Training: A Meta Analysis Examining Interference of Aerobic and Resistance Exercise. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 26(8), 1-1. Retrieved August 10, 2014, from

The limitation of the study is that there was not a placebo group for the metformin users. By not having a control group to compare with an experimental group, the study results might be affected as it is exposed to extraneous threats, thus losing its reliability and validity (Rebar, Gersch, Macnee & McCabe, 2011). Secondly, there were a greater number of men than women in the trial, which could lead to a more favorable result towards men doing the aerobic exercise, thus decreasing the reliability of generalizing to a larger population of women (Rebar et al., 2011).

Based off of the nine articles selected, this SRR is considered a level II study. Each was a randomized control trial (RCTs) and indicates strong and well-designed studies. A systematic review of randomized RCTs are at the top of the hierarchy of evidence, are level one, and are considered the most rigorous (Melnyk & Fineout-Overholt, 2015). Candidates were healthy

(p=0.037) from baseline (p = 0.046), physical activity (TM > UC), and daily weight at 90 days (TM > UC, p = 0.0332).

However, both studies only use Randomized Controlled Trial study, Clinically Controlled Trial and Trial Study were selected. According to Abalos E, Carroli G, Mackey ME, Bergel E (2001), Randomized controlled trials provide the most reliable results with regard to the effectiveness of interventions. This review is clearly defined about the sample condition, the intervention, a comparison and control, and the outcome measure that is to be used to determine the effectiveness. It is important as the effects of the intervention may be different in different groups.

Many athletes, predominantly field-based, necessitate superior levels of strength and aerobic capacity simultaneously to be competitive within their sport. Therefore, concurrently incorporating strength and endurance training within a training regime is common practice amongst athletes. Research shows concurrent training (CT) has substantial benefits for endurance performance by improving economy of movement and power output, with little influence on VO2max (Blagrove, 2013). Conversely, strength gains are repeatedly reported to be attenuated with the addition of endurance training, a phenomenon often termed the inference effect. However, the underlying mechanism

Muscular strength and endurance is also important to consider when looking at an individual’s overall fitness. In this lab, we performed the grip strength and it is used to assess injury or motivation. Also, it evaluates the strength the individual is using. Assessing muscular endurance is important to the clinician because it helps with exercise prescription, and it tells the clinician whether or not the individual has certain muscle weakness or imbalance that could make them more prone to

This research study is significant because it shows the many benefits which can be gained from repeated bouts of high-intensity interval training over a short period of time. Knowing this information may be useful to coaches, practitioners, and instructors when designing exercise programs for a variety of populations (Ziemann, 2011). One example from this article is how the exercise protocol used may be beneficial in combating the effects of detraining during the off season for certain athletes (Ziemann, 2011). High-intensity interval training may also be able to be used in a group fitness settings as well. In this study, twenty-one participants performed repeated bouts of high-intensity interval training using various types of cycle ergometers

The study conducted was done in the form of a random controlled trial (RCT). A RCT was the optimum methodology of choice as it is used to compare two or more treatment procedures (Farrelly 2013 p.43), as this study is demonstrating. By selecting the method of RCT the researcher is enhancing the validity and possibility of application of the study, as RCT it is “considered the strongest research design for evaluating

Participants were recruited through exercise and health courses at the University. However, they had be have been physically activity on a regular basis. The group had to be in good health; were not on any medications; had a stable body mass; and were nonsmokers.

Patient has not expressed any concerns regarding his physical health. He believes he is receiving all nutritional sources necessary. The patient feels that he exercises a healthy amount. The patient did not show much interested but was curious to find out the results. As a clinician, I don’t have any concerns regarding this patient’s physical health or nutritional intake. He seems to be a very health-conscious person. The first goal set for this patient was to increase water intake. The second goal was to

Another study that was written about in this article was done here in North Carolina. Anthony Hackney whom is an exercise physiologist