1) In YOUR OWN WORDS write a few sentences describing what a scientific model is. A scientific model is a tool that helps explain natural phenomenons or answer scientific questions. A scientific model can come in a variety of different forms such as drawings, graphs, equations, and three dimensional figures. They use these visuals to not only make it easier for other people to understand their models, but also as a form of evidence to prove that the conclusion they reached through an experiment or test was valid. 2) What are some important things a scientist looks for when she is judging the acceptability of a model? (Describe AT LEAST THREE.) Some important things scientists look for when they are judging the acceptability of a model is whether the model explain most of or all of the observations made, will your model still work or be the best answer if a new piece of evidence related to your model's system was discovered, and if the model is acceptable and realistic. …show more content…
Describe SPECIFICALLY why the model was replaced and why the new model is considered to be better than the old one (you may use an example from the article, from the modeling activity you did in class, or from another area of
1. What is the difference between a hypothesis and a scientific Theory? Between a hypothesis and a prediction? What kinds of hypotheses are useful for scientific investigations that try to explain the natural world, and which are not? Give one or more examples of hypotheses that are and are not scientifically useful.
The scientific method is used during experiments to find a conclusion and or reason as to why an event or something happens.
6. Restate your predictions that were correct and give the data from your experiment that supports them. Restate your predictions
12. Why are both natural AND controlled experiments necessary to increasing scientific understanding, and how do their roles in the scientific process differ?
SCIENTIFIC PROCESS- the scientific process is a way to make sure that your experiment can give a good answer to your question. We use observations, hypotheses, predictions, experimentation, and conclusions.
Question 5: Now that you have had a chance to apply your guiding statement to several simulations, on a scale of 1 to 10 (1
Question 5: Now that you have had a chance to apply your guiding statement to several simulations, on a scale of 1 to 10 (1
For the second part of your assignment, you will apply the scientific method to a real-life situation. You will select a problem that leads to a testable question, similar to the scenarios presented in Part I and explain how you would follow each step of the scientific method to try and answer the question or solve the problem. Note: you are describing only what you would do at each step; you will not be conducting the experiment.
Models provide the physical testing and proof of a hypothesis by exploring the extent to which the two factors relate within the given hypothesis. It puts a theory into action, to see if the theory is corrected causes and effects.
Models provide the physical testing and proof of a hypothesis by exploring the extent to which the two factors relate within the given hypothesis. It puts a theory into action, to see if the theory is correct.
The scientific method is a process that is used to answer questions and solve problems. Although there are different variations of the scientific method, it contains 5 basic steps. (1) Recognize a question or an unexplained occurrence in the natural world. Once this question has been developed examine scientific literature to determine what is already known about the subject matter. (2) Develop a hypothesis. A hypothesis is
11. What are the two main types of scientific inquiry? Give an example of each.
* Explain your choices and elaborate on how the models can best be applied to the selected problems.
The Scientific Method is the standardized procedure that scientists are supposed to follow when conducting experiments, in order to try to construct a reliable, consistent, and non-arbitrary representation of our surroundings. To follow the Scientific Method is to stick very tightly to a order of experimentation. First, the scientist must observe the phenomenon of interest. Next, the scientist must propose a hypothesis, or idea in which the experiments will be based around. Then, through repeated experimentation, the hypothesis can either be proven false or become a theory. If the hypothesis is proven to be false, the scientist must reformulate his or her ideas and come up with another hypothesis, and the experimentation begins again. This
Most importantly are that theories must be clear and understandable so that they may be tested, otherwise they will be undermined and unable to be put up against practice. Theories are expected to pass certain prerequisites laid out in science i.e. logical consistency, scope and parsimony. Or in other words a theory should be clearly defined, incorporate an inclusive scope, but is explained using a limited reasoning. A theory is best if it can avoid being tautological in nature, although sometimes unavoidable, nevertheless a theories empirical validity and reliability is what the scientific community relies upon when determining the overall value of theories. After all, the ultimate reason scientist theorize is to solve the puzzle or