Socratic Method Of Teaching And Study Philosophy

Critical thinking occurs when a person thinks about a subject or problem to where the development of the quality of ones very own psychological process of actively and skillfully applying, analyzing, and gauging information to come up with an answer or decision. A few important skills that is learned through critical thinking is learning how to discipline oneself in thinking, understanding the world as well as learning themselves. While using Critical thinking in your academic career path while other benefiting from your answer or idea.

In my own point of view of what I think critical thinking means is a guide to make a logical decision based on a number of variables such as factual evidence and credible resources that can create valid statements behind the action of thought process including being open-mindedness and demonstrating the differences of valid evidence and assuming to make and communicate their point of view to be understood by the others in a conversation.

Critical thinking is the intellectually disciplined process of actively and skillfully conceptualizing, applying, analyzing, synthesizing, and/or evaluating information gathered from, or generated by, observation, experience, reflection, reasoning, or communication, as a guide to belief and action. In its exemplary form, it is based on universal intellectual values that transcend subject matter divisions: clarity, accuracy, precision, consistency, relevance, sound evidence, good reasons, depth, breadth, and fairness. (Critical thinking community, n.d.)

A Socratic Seminar is a formal discussion, named after the famous Greek philosopher, Socrates, who literally gave his life for his belief in the power of provoking people to uncover the deeper meanings of important topics. The purpose of our dialogue is to build understanding together of the text we are reading, using the process of rigorous and thoughtful dialogue. In a Socratic

To add context to my response, I shall give a brief description of the Socratic method. According to the textbook, the Socratic method is “ a conversational method that proceeds by means of a series of questions and answers…” (Text). The goal of this method is to force the person being questioned to evaluate their originally inadequate responses and to work toward clearer answers brought on by thinking more deeply about what is being asked. This method allows a person to grow not by being given the answers, but by

Socrates starts this method of elenchus by questioning a supposedly wise person about the definition of certain virtues. For example, in Plato’s Euthyphro, Socrates asks Euthyphro what piety is. After this, the person gives their definition of that virtue. In Plato’s Euthyphro, Euthyphro’s answer is “ I say that the pious is to do what I am doing now, to prosecute the wrongdoer, be it about murder or temple robbery or anything else, whether the wrongdoer is your father or your mother or anyone else; not to prosecute is impious” (Plato). After this, Socrates proves the persons definition wrong through the use of examples, and then another definition is given, and the process repeats itself. Therefore the Socratic Method has three steps: the definition is given, Socrates refutes the definition with examples, and then another definition is given. This process then repeats itself until the person who thought they knew something realizes they knew nothing at all. Socrates operates under the assumption that philosophical inquiry into virtue must take nothing for granted. Therefore he leaves no rock unturned when looking into virtue, and completely debunks circular definitions when they are given to him. Friedrich Nietzsche was a German philosopher in the late 1800’s who agreed with Socrates that the “unexamined life is not worth living,” however he disagrees with the Socratic

The Socratic Method is a very famous method of questioning that is not very known, although it is very important, even today. It inspires the respondent to dig deeply and think about the question with a new mind and new freedom which is obtained by discarding the previously held beliefs. The Socratic Method is valued because it allows people to live their lives in virtue. Living a virtuous life means to be honest, respectful, courageous, forgiving, and kind. One who lives a virtuous life is able to live a happy life.

Isn’t that the case, Meletos, both with horses and with all other animals?” (Plato, 512). In a nutshell, the Socratic Approach initiates with an allegory or question, expecting an answer which will lead Socrates to another question, and another, until finally any argument to the initial question is squashed and disproven,without finding an actual solution to the original question. This leaves listeners with an open ended question to find an answer for themselves based on personal knowledge and beliefs. “Socrates’ teaching method does not treat students as empty vessels to be filled with knowledge of facts, formulae and theorems. Rather, the teacher and students embark on a voyage of discovery. The teacher does not so much impart knowledge as elicit knowledge,” (Masud). Overall, his teaching method was a very introspective method that keeps great minds challenged to this day.

Critical thinking is a process in which a person actively participates, and with skill comes to conclusions that are based on what a person has seen, experienced, and what one may believe.

The phrase “Socratic method” gets tossed around quite a bit during the course of a liberal arts education. One way of describing this method is teaching by means of asking. The thought is that by asking questions, a teacher may trigger some thought in the student’s mind which comes about more organically and effectively than by the means of traditional lecture. Employing the Socratic method allows a teacher to guide a student’s train of thought toward a particular goal, and use of the method requires on the part of the teacher both a keen understanding of psychology and a clear idea as to where the line of questioning is intended to lead. The latter part of that statement becomes

Professor Pike’s teaching style involves a lecture with a visual aid. This teaching style seems to be the most effective for me because I can see what the professor is trying to explain on a PowerPoint. I have read and heard stories about law schools being notorious for using the Socratic Method for classroom instruction. The idea is to encourage all students to be fully prepared with their cases briefed- ready to be called at any time. Interestingly enough, I feel like this was a form of a revised Socratic method. The professor did call on random students by looking at his seating chart and choosing someone and then the student had to give all of the important facts of the case, the issue presented, and what court it was brought up in. If the student was missing a key piece of evidence, the professor would probe further, asking more challenging questions and if the student did not know, other students were allowed to answer. There seemed to be more opportunities to

Namely, I will ask questions to help the students arrive to the objective for the lesson. This technique provides a number of benefits. For instance, the students are able to think critically. They are able to recognize for themselves, with guidance from directed questions, the objective of the lesson. In addition, they are to relate what they had previously learned with what they recently learned in the current lesson. Hopefully, they are able to use the Socratic Method independently without assistance from a teacher. Additionally, I would implement different teaching strategies because respective students learn differently.

development of the Socratic Method. It was believed that the best approach to a problem was the breakdown of questions that would lead to solutions. The use of counterexamples was a means of discovering the root of the problem because there would be alternate explanations for the problem.

Critical thinking means accurate thinking in the search of appropriate and dependable knowledge about the world. Another way to describe it is sensible, insightful, responsible, and skillful thinking that is focused on deciding what to believe or do. Critical thinking is not being able to process information well enough to know to stop for red lights or whether you established the right change at the supermarket.

After determining a statement to employ the Socratic Method on, my mom and I proceeded to question if there were any situations in which this statement is an exception