There are 347 division 1 schools among 23 sports there are 420,000 athletes. Most days of Americas 420,000 athletes D1 athletes include of multiple interactions majority involving something to do with the sport they play. Waking up at 5:30 am for a 6:00 am practice for about an hour, then going to classes through the day which student athletes have to be full time students in order to be eligible to play so they are taking up to 4, 5 classes. Not to mention D1 athletes also have individual workouts throughout the day they have to attend also treatments for their body and still managing to eat throughout the day. But that’s just half the day until practice for about 2 hours in the evening or maybe even the night, so that leaves no time to study or even do homework, unless throughout the day you had to go to study hall which last for about 2 hours. Well over half the time of your day is dedicated to the sport you play, doesn’t that sound like a full time job, as to why college athletes should be paid not only because the time commitment but the revenue college athletics make and also the risk of injury while playing a sport. One of the main reasons why D1 college athletes should be paid is due to the revenue colleges make through the athletic department. The success from the athletes and athletic teams serve as a marketing tool or form of advertisement for the institution. Studies show, Universities bring in hundreds of thousands or even millions of dollars to their athletic
Collegiate sports have turned into a billion dollar industry and are probably just as popular, if not more popular than professional sports. College athletes put their bodies on the line to play a sport they love, many with hopes and dreams to one day make it to the professional leagues. Athletic facilities are the major money makers for all universities. Colleges bring in billions of dollars in revenue annually, yet athletes do not get paid. Some fans believe athletes should not get paid due to their sports level being “amateurish.”; however, this is far from the truth. There is much more to being a college athlete than just practicing and playing games. These student-athletes must practice, weight lift, go to meetings, travel, go to tutoring and study groups, all the while maintaining sufficient grades. This is very tedious work and is very time consuming. College athletes have a high standard to live up to (Frederick Web; Huma Web; Patterson Web ).
With this large time restriction, it can be close to impossible to find and maintain a job. Student athletes need extra money in order to maintain a stable financial base. It would make so much more sense if athletes were compensated for the work they are putting in. They clock countless hours practicing and forming their game. A typical college athlete will spend just as much time practicing their sport as a normal job. They do all of this just so people on the side can reap the benefits. Student athletes should receive financial compensation because coaches and schools receive billions while the athletes receive nothing (Hopkins,par.7). It is scary to think how out of hand this could get if something is not changed. Why not give the money to the people who are working for it? Why not the players? Lack of time is not the only reason college athletes should be paid. The amount of money that the athletes generate is the main reason that the players should be payed.
The student athletes at most universities can be compared to employees, yet receiving no wages (Cooper 12). Along with time in the classroom and being a full-time student, athletes are expected to spend just as much time on their respective sport. In an article “Top 10 Reasons College Athletes Should Be Paid,” Dave Anderson explains that a college athlete spends just over 43 hours a week devoted to their sport. Those hours are spent with mandatory lifting workouts, conditioning workouts, watching film, position meetings, and practice. As I stated earlier, all this time that is spent on their sport is in addition to the time spent in the classroom with homework and studying. All of that added up well surpasses the time of the average work week at 40 hours and these athletes can quite honestly be looked at as workers for their universities.
College sports is a multi-billion dollar industry. Each year thousands of high school students are recruited to play college sports, but under strict conditions. Students are required to do well in athletics while keeping up with their academics. College athletes spend up to forty five hours per week on practices, training, and games. In addition, they spend roughly forty hours on their academics. The NCAA (National Collegiate Athletics Association) does not think it is necessary to pay these athletes because they want to maintain the “amateur sport” status. According to Stanley Eitzen in his “College Athletes should be Paid, “The universities and the NCAA claim their athletes in big-time sports programs
Sports have been a big part of culture in the United States since the 1900’s. Sports has become a multibillion dollar business of sort, with spots such as baseball, basketball, and football captivating americans.With american sports gaining popularity, the growth of college sports went on the rise. In 2013, The National Collegiate Athletic Association statistically generated $912,804,046 (Alesia, 2014). With all of this income that the NCAA brought in, one has to raise the question, should college athletes be paid? Even though college athletes are student athletes, they should be paid because they are practically employees to the college without compensation.
Tyson Hartnett says, “Contrary to what all the opponents believe, being an athlete is a full-time job. On a typical day, a player will wake up before classes, get a lift or conditioning session in, go to class until 3 or 4 p.m., go to practice, go to mandatory study hall, and then finish homework or study for a test.For a little extra money to see a movie or go out to dinner once a week, my freshman roommate worked a job at the university, earning about $7/hour. He would work his butt off all day, with two or sometimes three basketball training sessions, plus classes and homework, and go to that job for a few hours late at night. He would come back exhausted, but he needed whatever money they would pay him. However, once the season started up, he couldn 't work that job anymore.” Student athletes should be paid due to school and playing a sport taking up all of their time. This is basically the same principle as having a job and going to school. Playing a sport and going to school is equal to working and going to school.
College Athletes should not be paid to play because the scholarship they are receiving is enough. (Dayton Daily News) College Athletes are not professional this is not their career .(Dayton Daily News) The statements are all very true but the college athletes are practicing the same amount of time as the professionals but they aren't getting paid anything for their hard work and dedication. College Athletes are the main ones that are on a trip out of town for tournaments, ect. So that means that they need traveling,eating,and extra expenses for their journey
Imagine being full-time student working a full-time job helping the company assembles millions of dollars, but not getting paid for the job. As a college athlete playing sports is a full-time job. The average D1 football player spends 43.3 hours per week on football (Michelle). Some NCAA tournaments require students to miss somewhat six classroom days. This paper is going to explain some reasons why college student athletes should be paid.
College athletes should not be paid. “ They argue that the main purpose of going to college is to get a education, not to make money” (“Should college”...1). College is not a job, it is a place to learn. Also many college athletes receive scholarships to attend that school. “The value of the scholarships athletes receive during four years of college can be well over $250,000” (Weiss et al.1). Therefore, athletes
As of today, there are over 460,000 NCAA student-athletes that compete in 24 different sports while in college throughout the United States (NCAA). Over the past couple decades, the argument for paying these college athletes has gained steam and is a hot topic in the sports community. However, paying these college athletes is not feasible because most universities do not generate enough revenue to provide them with a salary and some even lose money from the sports programs. These collegiate student-athletes are amateurs and paying them would ruin the meaning of college athletics. Also, playing college sports is a choice and a privilege with no mention or guarantee of a salary besides a full-ride scholarship. Although some argue that
Another argument in the case for college athletes to be paid would be that the scholarships that are offered to athletes aren’t enough to cover the lost wages they would gain from working a job. Even though some athletes are offered full ride scholarships to great universities, they aren’t enough to pay their rent and other bills that they have. With athletes committing so much time for sports they do not have the time to get a job and pay for their bills and other things they need. This puts more strain on the athletes and can cause them to drop out of their respective sports and when that happens they ultimately lose their scholarships. College athletics are more demanding than a full-time job should pay their athletes for their services provided to the university they play for. The wages lost by athletes at universities are even greater than those working typical eight-hour days. Since athletes, football in particular, commit an immense amount of time to their sports they could be obtaining a wage far greater than the amount of the scholarship they obtained for attending and participating in sports at a university. Another point to be made would be that only a small portion of the people associated with college athletics receive full scholarships. This means that not only are athletes committing so much time and effort for sports, they must pay out of pocket for the portion that their respective
A normal Division 1 (D1) college athlete practices about 40 hours a week (Nocera). A full time job is usually considered working at least 35 hours a week, so when that time is all filled with physical activity, the athletes are putting in even more effort than a normal job. If an adult or someone from the NCAA was working that hard on something every week, they would demand to be paid, but not so with the college athletes. Also, if athletes are practicing and playing 40 hours a week, how are they going to be able to work a job to support themselves while in college? Not everyone has parents that can or are willing to pay for all of a college student’s extra expenses, as well as their daily needs.
Including training sessions, games, travel and other requirements that student athletes may have to attend to. Then they are working the same amount of hours as those in full-time employment. Salaries are also based on a standard 40-hour work week. Since colleges are getting paid for NCAA tournaments why shouldn't the players get paid since they are the ones putting in the hard work?
The first reason a college athlete should be paid is that they put in more time on their game than an average american. An average full time working American works 40 hours a week based on a set salary. Division One NCAA football players spend more than 40 hours a week on their game alone. In addition to those 40 plus hours that the players use to train, travel, play, they also have to attend ten plus hours of class time each week. All around college athletes have to work more than 40 hours a week just to remain an unpaid student athlete.
The research behind this particular study showed that students whether non- athletes or athletes that attend RPI (religious practicing institutions) or those that attend NRPI (none religious practicing institutions) all vary in regarding to the strength of their religious faith. These results of the study were based upon four different questions that were used to keep the study with in the appropriate context. Both male and female athletes as well as non-athletes were chosen during psychology classes from either institution. The results of the study showed that NPRI athletes didn’t have a stronger differentiation from non-athletes that attended the same NPRI but one variable that did prove to have a strong contextual showing once the results were shown was that females were shown to have a stronger sense of religious faith in comparison to men..