The Consequences Of Animal Testing

opinion essay that will be written for scientists who are hostile about stopping animal testing for scientific purposes. Animal testing is performed every year on millions of animals for the purpose of research into the effectiveness of drugs and treatment for diseases. Many of the animals that get tested vary from a wide range of rodents, to primates, to household pets such as cats and dogs. Today, general testing on animals are cruel, expensive, and generally inapplicable to humans. The world’s most

Throughout history, animal testing has always been a controversial and sensitive topic. It can easily receive much hate as well as praise which could be accounted for by many different factors. Animal testing is such a broad idea that can be misconceived in multiple ways such as unethical animal breeding, mutations, or cruel product testing. Yet, that is not the case at all since animal testing could also have a positive and beneficial outcome to which helps people in society. While there are many

While Carl Cohen’s framework for determining that animals do not have rights is logical in some sense, his application is missing important considerations. He solely evaluates the consequences for humanity if animals did indeed have rights, and fails to consider what consequences animals may face if humans conclude that animals do not have any rights. Cohen states that although animals, from his view, may not have rights, humanity still has an obligation to treat them humanely. In an ideal world

path which grants humanity a way to use our free will of choice so that, as a result, we suffer the least amount of consequences, or no consequences at all. Some debates seem more clear-cut than others, but when we begin to consider nonhuman individuals, the more complicated a previously simple debate becomes. For example, most people agree on the immorality of forced human testing, but many do not

The changes that need to made to the AWA are that it needs to include all animals. This will ensure that every animal is protected under a law. Another change to the AWA is to make a punishment for not following the law. This could be a number of things, but the most effective would be a fine and a representative from the USDA sent to oversee or check up on the changes being made to make the facility follow the law. For this solution to work the USDA needs to hire more inspectors and representatives

Animal testing is inhuman, and should be banned. Yes, animal testing has been around for a very long time, but it doesn’t mean we should still do it. Testing on animals should be banned because they are abused and hurt, most experiments involving animals are flawed, wasting the lives of the animal subjects, and more than 90% of animal testing fail once they reach human trials. When they test on the animals they aren’t thinking about the pain or the torture the animal is going through. For instance

Animals, humans, alike are thinking breathing and emotional creatures that habit this beautiful Earth. Every year over 100 million animals die from animal testing and biological experiments (Peta.) Animals may not be able to reason or talk, but they can suffer. They feel pain and fear similarly to the way humans do, in fact their reactions to pain are almost identical. Therefore should not be taken advantage of or used as test dummies. The consequence of testing on animals for the greater good does

who is cruel to animals becomes hard also in his dealings with men. We can judge the heart of a man by his treatment of animals.” This paper will be covering the moral issue on animal testing and whether animal testing is right or wrong. I will be applying the theories of Deontological, Utilitarianism and Virtue Ethics viewpoints on animal testing and then see which moral issue is better. Animal testing is a very relevant and debatable moral issue. It is when scientists take animals and run different

main goal when showing an animal is to win, or make the sale at their respective shows. How far will exhibitors actually go to win a show though? In recent years there has been controversy at many major livestock shows over drug testing, and animals testing hot for illegal drugs which means when tested there was traces found of illegal substances within the animal. This is not the only way people have been caught cheating though; some exhibitors have switched animals with another exhibitor prior

Why Products should not be tested on Animals Emily Smith Sena Lamar Community College Abstract Animal testing is a cruel way to try and develop new products. There are several other and much safer options that will get better results and potentially save up to two million animals every single year. The Animal Welfare Act is in place but only minimally protects certain animals and leaves many others, up to 95%, vulnerable to atrocious fates. The animals not protected by this act (mostly small or