The Efficacy of Methotrexate (MTX) versus Placebo in Early Diffuse Scleroderma(1). Introduction The aim of this essay is to explore the objectives, the hypotheses, the study design, the research methods, statistical data analysis, the results and the ensuing discussion in the research paper mentioned above and try attempt analyze why, contrary to expectations, this study did not find a significant efficacy of MTX in dcSSc despite having documented efficacy in skin scores. Systemic sclerosis (SSc) is a chronic, rare, complex, multisystem, autoimmune disease of the connective tissues with diverse variants. Progressively the skin thickens and scars, with excessive accumulation of fibers, cells and collagen in the skin and visceral organs, …show more content…
Further ahead (8) guidelines on metrics in disease activity indices such as STPR as a predictor of mortality and visceral involvement (9). These RCTs has probable findings on the efficacy of MTX (10)(11).Interventions which aim at pathogenesis hold a promising future(e.g. Imatinib).Therapeutic agents targeting the fibrotic and vascular pathways(4) , conversely, improving survival rates (6). Nonconformity with the CONSORT 2010 checklist Randomization curbs bias. In this study, much detail remains unclear in the description of the trial design, methods, results and the conclusion. It is problematic in the non- adherence to the CONSORT statement, notwithstanding, the full trial protocol, availability and accessibility and its entry into the trial registry. Accordingly, registration precludes post hoc changes in the primary outcome whilst lessening the chances of outcome reporting bias. Surprisingly, the role of the sponsor or the funder has little attention paid given that it plays a role in generating a conflict of interest. Unsatisfactorily, a CONSORT flow diagram as a requisite in an RCT has been overlooked. This study has claims of stratified randomization, nevertheless, questions abide on the generation of the blocks, who generated the random allocation sequence, were there an allocation concealment mechanism, who enrolled the
Table 2 shows some of the chemical mediators involved in Mr X’s inflammatory process, causing it to become more severe and uncontrolled, resulting in a further decline in his clinical presentation.
Misconception with equipoise will make the barrier between therapeutic and research null. Its goal in producing reliable and generalizable knowledge is coiled in with ethical difficulty. That’s why on an ethical standpoint, benefiting a collective group needs to be weighed with the rights of the participant patients in the clinical research. However, the goal of equipoise is beneficial since its main priority is extracting epistemic information from the randomized clinical trials. The useful information is needed since equipoise follows the principle of having “a state of genuine uncertainty.” This affects both theoretical and clinical. So, trials that are redundant can be marked out by taking equipoise into account since the trials have already been run where there is already certainty of the outcome. So, to detail what equipoise allows underneath the principle of “non-exploitation” is that there will be no exploitation of participants or patients with a needless trial that holds no useful outcome. Equipoise becomes a necessary condition in order for a trial to become ethical since trials must be reviewed to be deemed of value. But, there’s an underlying factor that equipoise’s uncertainty trials do not bring about and that is the health of the patients. Participant patients will undergo trials of uncertainty so there is a possibility that the patient may be harmed during the process. If the trial proceeds, then the health of the patients will be even more at risk, disregarded and exploited in order to grasp epistemic information. The moral principles between medical therapy and those that guide clinical research is different. Though, equipoise is valuable in a collective sense – it is exploitative of participant patients by failing to consider the balance with the subject and societal
Placebos have been used in clinical trials since the eighteenth century but did not become a research topic until the late twentieth century (van Haselen, 2013). Most often when using placebos in clinical trials it is to determine whether or not the active agent has more effect on a patient than the placebo by providing each to the same number of recipients. The trials are almost always double blinded, this means that both person giving the drug and the person receiving it are unaware whether or not it is active so that good care and relationships must be present in the recipients at all times (Tavel, 2014). Ovosi, Ibrahim, & Bello-Ovosi (2017) declared “The choice between placebo and active controls in clinical trials affects the quality of the result as well as the ethical and scientific acceptability by both the public and regulatory bodies. It has, therefore, continued to generate discuss among researchers” (para. 3). This goes against the autonomy of a patient which is the right for a person to
C. Thesis Statement: With autoimmune diseases such as Multiple Sclerosis on a steady rise over the past decade, three major factors must be considered: the possible causes, common symptoms, and
Interestingly, IRBs are set up mainly to confirm that a clinical trial is ethical and that the process will not harm patients. Whether or not the clinical trial is constructed properly or not is commented upon, but may not be a major focus of the review. For this reason, many institutions also require a concurrent review by an institutional “Office of Clinical Research” and a regular meeting of supervising clinicians during the
The first written report of multiple sclerosis was in 1400, when Lydwina of Schieden was diagnosed. The disease was described clinically by Jean-Martin Charcot in 1877. He recognized that the disease affected the nervous system and tried remedies, with no success. In 1890, suppression of sweat was thought to be the cause of multiple sclerosis, treatment was electrical stimulation and bed rest. By 1910, multiple sclerosis was thought to be caused by toxins in blood. In the 1930s, poor circulation was yet again believed to cause multiple sclerosis. In the 1950s through the 1970s, multiple sclerosis was thought to be causes by allergies. It wasn’t until the 1980s when multiple sclerosis was finally understood and treatment was developed (Campanella and Zawada).
The author believes that biomedical research is the way of better understanding medicine and without randomized clinical trials the field of medicine will have insufficient information. He argues that randomized clinical trials are the most scientifically sound and ethically correct means of evaluating new therapies. The belief of a physician being unethical when running randomized clinical trials is rejected by this article because previous trials on patients can have a better outcome on future patients. This article stresses that randomized clinical trials must be carefully designed that has an intended purpose of gathering data to improve the wellbeing of patients. If the patient is to endure a clinical trial he/she must be properly informed of the risks of the trial and the health of the patient should be high priority. Overall this article explains the importance of randomized clinical trials and debunks the idea of randomized clinical trials as being unethical. This article uses a utilitarian point of view and gives reasons why these trials can be in the best interests for both the patient and society.
Lindsey previous admission was prolonged due to delay Methotrexate level clearance despite increase her IV fluid up to 200ml/m2/hr mls. She stated that upon admission, she had swelling in her Lt leg which already resolve. She gained almost 12 bound within a week and a half. She didn't have any nausea or vomiting, but she had an increased appetite and kept eating most of the time.
Systemic Sclerosis (SSc) is a complex, polygenic autoimmune disease that affects approximately 75,000 to 100,000 people in the United States. There are approximately 20 new cases per million per year and a total of 250 patients per million [1, 2]. SSc typically presents at approximately 40 years of age and is more common in women than in men [3]. SSc is a very heterogeneous disease where patients can display a variety of symptoms: the three most common symptoms are tissue and organ fibrosis, vasculopathy and autoimmunity/autoantibody production.
To help a patient with skin and movement problems associated with Scleroderma advice is given to do exercises to move joints, to dress warmly to help with Raynaud’s, use sunscreen, use humidifier at home, avoid hot baths/showers and scented moisturizers. To help a patient’s kidneys their blood pressure will be checked regularly and take medicine if blood pressure changes randomly. All heart problems that may occur(scarring, weakness, swelling or abnormal heartbeat) can be treated by a cardiologist. Digestion problems can be helped by not eating acidic, fatty, or spicy foods as well as getting medications to help with gas, constipation, or heartburn. Lung problems can be helped by getting regular pneumonia and flu shots. Dental and speech problems are important because it can be hard to move your face due to tight skin. It is recommended that a patient to learn ways to keep their mouth and face flexible and to keep their mouth moist by drinking a lot of water or chewing on
Hasegawa M. Biomarkers in systemic sclerosis: Their potential to predict clinical courses. Journal of Dermatology. 2016; 43: 29-38.
This measure is a reliable indicator of trial quality and is based on each trial’s reporting and quality of randomisation and blinding attribution (CASP 2006).
There are two main subtypes of SSc – limited(lcSSc) and diffuse(dcSSc) – which are defined according to the pattern of skin involvement. The third and less prevalent subtype is SSc sine scleroderma, or SSc without hard skin, meaning a person has the internal organ manifestations, but no skin involvement.Poormoghim etal in his study on systemic sclerosis patients concluded that ssSSc should not be considered as a separate entity,but should be included under the spectrum of SSc with limited cutaneous involvement.(15) Clinical profiles of ssSSc were found to be similar compared to lcSSc, and milder than dcSSc, including rates of interstitial lung diseases, in a multicenter study on 1417 subjects from the Canadian Scleroderma Research Group registry. Patients with ssSSc had serological profiles similar to those with lcSSc,
The study itself was a double-blind, double-dummy, 52 week study that took place at multiple centers.1 There were four groups in this trial with a 1:1:1:1 distribution.1 These groups consisted of 4 mg/kg TCZ+MTX, 8 mg/kg TCZ+MTX, 8 mg/kg TCZ+placebo and 7.5 mg/week placebo+MTX, the latter group was increased to 20 mg/week if the physician or patient felt it necessary.1 The American College of Rheumatology scoring system, a Disease Activity score, and X-rays were used to determine progress to remission in the patients.1
This study was conducted on thirty adult patients with SLE Patients were selected from rheumatology outpatient's clinic of AL-Zahraa hospital, Cairo, Egypt, during the period from June 2015 till October 2016. SLE patients fulfilling the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) revised criteria for the diagnosis of SLE were included11. Patients with clinical manifestations of SLE such as malar rash, photosensitivity, alopecia, oral ulcers arthritis, nephritis, neuropathy and hypertension were included in the study. Current medications were recorded , Patients with diabetes mellitus, malignancies and those with a diagnosis of mixed connective tissue disease were excluded. The study also included thirty age and sex matched apparently healthy