The hypothetical scenario given for this assignment talks about a bill signed by the President that is approved by Congress. This law becomes known as the Protecting American Integrity Act, which addresses the issue of “fake news” in the media. The label of “fake news” is in reference to any published information that portrays elected officials in a negative manner. In contrast, any published information that portrays elected officials in a positive manner shall be labeled as “real news.” The Protecting American Integrity Act causes an issue with the sources of law titled statues and executive order. This is an issue with the source of law statues because the bill was approved by the U.S. Senate and the U.S. House of Representatives and …show more content…
Whether the information portrays the elected official in a positive or negative manner does not correspond with whether the information is “real” or “fake.” The Protecting American Integrity Act would be considered compelled speech, but would not be considered prior restraint. The book defines prior restraint as an “action taken by the government to prohibit publication of a specific document or text before it is distributed to the public; a policy that requires government approval before publication” (Trager, et al., 2016, p. 693). This means that information under prior restraint requires permission from the government before it can be published.
An example of prior restraint is the case of Near v. Minnesota. “Minnesota law allowed the state to enjoin publication of any periodical that typically produced ‘malicious, scandalous, and defamatory ‘ content” (Coyle, E., 01/25/17). There was also a use of an injunction which is permission granted by a judge to require that all publication of the scandalous or defamatory information be removed. Jay Near, the defendant in Near v. Minnesota, published in his paper that “city officials were standing by as Jewish gangsters operated gambling, bootlegging and racketeering business across the city” (Trager, et al., 2016, p. 66). This caused an uproar after the state of Minnesota reviewed the case and implemented a ban of
According to the First Amendment law from United States Constitution, a prior restraint is classified as a federal action which forbids speech or other mediums of communication and expression prior to publication. Under the First Amendment, American citizens and the press are granted the liberty of free speech. However, under certain terms the officials will sanction this blockage. For over 70 years, corporations and public figures have often wished they could stop media and broadcast stations from publishing sensitive information, their ability to censor or take action against them is very limited. The U.S Supreme Court considers this suppressive tactic as “the most serious and the least tolerable infringement on First Amendment rights”. Scholars
Although many people may like to think of America as a honest and moral nation, it is no secret that artifice has cemented itself as an indispensable skill, exploited by many to achieve their own ambitions. Artifice, characterized through the usage of cunning devices or expedients to deceive others, is often utilized by politicians and organizations to help push their own agendas. As illustrated by Chris Hedges in his social commentary, Empire of Illusion, “artifice” has emerged to become so ubiquitous and essential throughout American society, whether in business or the entertainment industry. Essential, in the essence that without it, people in any industry are more likely to be disadvantaged in achieving their personal goals. In today’s modern world, no area has seen more abuse of artifice than in the field of media and politics. Its common knowledge that newspapers skew reports to their own biases and politicians often tell half-truths to cover-up ulterior motives. Unfortunately, these politicians and media giants hold extremely influential positions in society, and their usage of artifice is extremely damaging to the integrity and accountability within the United States. As a result, the press as well as the general populace must utilize free speech to expose this behavior. Despite the complete immorality of the usage of artifice, such chicanery remains essential for success in media and politics.
The applicants are morally correct as long as their action promotes their long term interest. If their action produces or will produce for them a greater outcome of good, versus evil in the long hall than any other alternative, than that action is the right one to act on, and the individual should take that to be a moral act. An Assessment of Morality by Ethicsinbusiness.net
In order to create a successful marketing plan, a situational analysis must be conducted on AllStar Brands Medicine Group. This situational analysis will be an internal and external analysis and will include the 5Cs, known as Context, Competitors, Customers, Collaborators, and Company. To begin the situational analysis, it is critical to ask, "Where are we now?" The situational analysis will allow for our company to understand the current situation further and make better informed decisions for the future when discussing our marketing strategy. After the marketing strategy has been discussed, the marketing mix will be a direct result of those marketing strategies created.
Another case in which freedom of speech is abridged is in the military. The military is an arm of the executive branch. The military has active total control of the speech of its members on active service, and near-total control of veterans who know
IgG – funtions in neutralizing, opsonation, compliment activation, antibody dependent cell-mediated cytocity, neonatal immunity, and feedback inhibition of B-cells and found in the blood.
2) For year 1 the new system depreciated by 20 percent. Multiply that by the net initial investment and you get the total amount depreciated after 1 year, equal to $60,588. With a 36 percent tax rate you get the depreciated tax savings of $21,812.
During the first session it is important to ensure that the practitioner can provide the client with
Scenario: John is a 4 year-old boy who was admitted for chemotherapy following diagnosis of acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). He had a white blood cell count of 250,000. Clinical presentation included loss of appetite, easily bruised, gum bleeding, and fatigue. Physical examination revealed marked splenomegaly, pale skin color, temperature of 102°F, and upper abdomen tenderness along with nonspecific arthralgia.
This assignment asks us to compare and contrast the impeachment proceedings of Presidents Andrew Johnson, Richard Nixon and William Clinton, while identifying the ethical dilemmas presented by each. In addition, students are to categorize the ethical violations of each President by severity and discuss whether the actions by the Senate were politically motivated or ethical.
1. Discuss the use of music in Catholic and Protestant worship practice, from the development of polyphony, through the music of J.S. Bach. In so doing, discuss the shift in responsibility for musical development from the Catholic Church to the Lutheran Church.
Build the management-research question hierarchy, through the investigative questions stage. Then compare your list with the measurement questions asked.
The next scenario C, Atwood changes the plot of the storyline again. John is married to Madge, and there lives as a couple is described as version A. The twist to this is he is bored with Madge and ends up falling in love with Mary and they begin to have an affair. Mary herself is already involved with another man named James. To whom she is in love with, and who is her own age. John finds out, kills them both including himself. After time passes, Madge ends up marrying a guy named Fred. The couple lives their lives as version A. In Scenario D, it echoes the storyline of version A but with Fred and Madge. “Fred and Madge have no problems” (Atwood 767), but some things are just out of their control. They had a near death experience with a Tidal
1. Read and respond to the 5 situations below, describing what you would recommend given each situation, and using at least one of the ethical frameworks or theories discussed in Ch. 12 for each scenario. Submit your answers in a Word document.
The recent surge in popularity of social media comes with a price: fake news. Fake news is defined as news or media that has been altered or modified. Journalists have begun to analyze why that fake news exists and why it continues exist. Two authors, Eoin O’Carroll and Kevin D. Williamson, both have written articles about fake news. Eoin O’Carroll’s article “How Information Overload Helps Spread Fake News,” discusses how the media has bombarded us with news stories, blurring the distinct lines between real and fake news. Kevin D. Williamson, a journalist for the National Review, writes in his article “‘Fake News, Media and Voters: Shared Reality Must Be Acknowledged” that the news is not fake; it just does not align with one’s personal beliefs. Both authors successfully appeal to their audiences’ emotions and feelings, but O’Carroll is more likely to succeed than Williamson in persuading his audience to try and combat fake news because the writer presents himself as someone the intended readers will more readily identify with and offers evidence that his readers will find more compelling.