The Importance Of Creativity And Innovation Within Workforce

Today the way companies are running has changed. The world is driven by intense completion. The demands for workers that have out of box ideas and are creative thinkers have greatly increased. Organizations across the globe however often complain that there is a serious shortage of such creative thinkers with new ideas. Why is there a shortage of such creative employees? It to answer this question that one should read this book. Ken Robinson has successfully answered this question in his book along with other critical questions to provide an effective solution to infuse creativity;

This assignments topic is how diversity in Creativity and Innovation can give a company a competitive advantage over is competitors

Theories of creativity are vast. Several psychological theories on the process of creativity are chronicled. Some theorists explain creativity as intrinsic creative motivations, which individuals create a project for the sake of creating (Wibell, 2011). Other theorists convey the brain controls levels of creativity, and mental illness has an impact on creative process. Further, many believe the humanistic theory of creativity spawns the creative process. Through self-actualization creativity comes in peak experiences. The quality of the work depends on what is measured. The quality of the creative work depicts the message of the writing. The message can be

Creativity has become a buzzword. It is often mixed and used interchangeably with innovation. Therefore, many corporate leaders, managers and ordinary employees associate creativity with something sophisticated and complex, requiring a lot of effort and knowledge, and, therefore, difficult to pursue. Although creativity is a critical building block of innovation, it is not the same. Moreover, it is not something that corporate leaders should ignore or be scared to encourage. In today’s world, where product centric approach is not sufficient for corporate success and progress, creativity in organizations is as important, including for profitability, as having adequate financial and capital resources. For that reason, the study of creativity

The beauty of creativity is that it is abstract, yet ubiquitous: in art, music or how one decides to compose an essay. However, creativity has recently been declining among the human population. According to an article, named, “The Creativity Crisis,” by Newsweek.com in July 2010, authors, Po Bronson and Ashley Merryman, state, “the Torrance Test … indicates that the public’s “creativity quotient” has steadily crept downward since 1990” (Prompt 1). Bronson and Merryman report that the test, which evaluates one’s creativity, had been dispensed to myriads of people across the globe, and have concluded that creativity has been slowly diminishing. Kyung Hee Kim, professor at the College of William and Mary, also comments that this is most prevalent and grave among students from kindergarten through sixth grade (Prompt 1). Consequently, society, or in this case, the world fears that current students and future generations will not be nourished with the creativity required to thrive as individuals, affecting the world as a whole. Ultimately, this poses the question whether a creative thinking class, which solely focuses on the education of creativity, should be taught in the school. This school should impose a creative thinking class, due to the fact creativity is a vital element for the future and is the solution to the creative crisis.

In the context of creativity’s stated definition, we will proceed to group our arguments into three themes of factors: cognitive ability, expertise training, and environmental conditions. The human brain is highly adaptable and can continue to develop new cognitive abilities, even past adulthood (Norman, 2015). Proper cognitive expertise and training can help workers produce and operate in ingenious ways (Ginamarie, Lertiz & Mumford, 2004). Finally, the working environment can both motivate or stifle creative output. Managers can influence all three components: expertise, thinking skills, and motivation (Amabile, 1998).

Employees are a major source of innovation and new ideas that have organizations. Above all, the factor that makes it so interesting is the fact that the generation of new ideas is produced internally, making it easy to process of innovation as long as the company counts with the channels and means to enhance and channel the creativity of its workforce (Gumusluoglu&Ilsev, 2009, pp. 461-73). That is why it is so necessary to adopt techniques and procedures aimed at channeling such creativity.

Creativity is often more about the process rather than the end project, it is useful for many reasons:

In this essay I will explore the correlation between intelligence (IQ) and creativity (DT), and whether one is influenced or can be predicted by the existence of the other. The relationship between IQ (intelligence quotient) and creativity has been an anchor point for psychological research. Numerous amounts of psychologists have carried out research in order to find evidence to support this idea of a correlation or evidence to disprove the hypothesis that IQ and creativity could be related.

The author of this article examines creative culture and societal changes that are making organizations rethink their view on creativity as well as to integrate knowledge of the creative procedure to their own frame of reference, focusing on exploring the 3 primary areas; social trends, creativity and advocacy, whilst also exhibiting deliberation for the intermingling of said themes and exhibits a clear-cut view that creativity and the creative procedure are imperative to the enrichment of the person, corporation and humanity, especially in current times.

Paulus & Nijstad (2003) defined creativity as “the development of original ideas that are useful or influential”(p.3). That is to say,

To conclude, creativity appears to be a general term. It's meaning differs from one person to another. Therefore, the question of "do schools kill creativity?" remains unrevealed. Some think that schools do kill creativity and others don’t, and the answers are based on the individual's idea about creativity. Moreover, the findings of the study about creativity learning are promising. As a result, we may be able to facilitate creativity learning in

The importance of a leader’s ability to embrace and promote change can not be over stated. It is imperative for a leader to understand and manage changes in the work place in order to promote innovation and therefore creativity from the work force. A leader that promotes innovation promotes an environment of change and with it people that are encouraged to accept changes. The leader’s role is very important because they have a duty to create and atmosphere that promotes innovative ideas and changes (Huber, 2014).

One of the latest buzzwords in business is creativity. There is no doubt that our world is changing quickly and we are constantly being asked to find solutions that are different, new and especially creative.

In the video “A Changing Culture of Creativity” by Howard Gardner, Gardner discusses the evolution; one could also say the possible devolution, of creativity in the world today and why we need to change the way we analyze. He points out that many young people have become followers in todays ever-changing technological world as opposed to the pioneers of creativity, like those we have seen in the past. Creativity needs to be nurtured and it must we must harness the use of the technology that connects us to do so.