Discuss how traditional approaches to management have to change in order to cultivate and foster creativity and innovation in workforce. Use examples to illustrate your discussion
Creativity can be simply described as the imagination to make up something new and valuable. Creativity has become an important component of problem solving and other cognitive abilities, healthy social and emotional well being and scholastic and adult success (young, 1985). Hence, creativity has become the essential factor for both the productive process and the consumption of the outcome, as they both require knowledge. Due to the massive crave of humans to create a comfortable environment that suits their unquenchable needs and wants in a world of scarce
…show more content…
This can be best described in the United States of America economy where every one has the opportunity to succeed and change their lives despite of their backgrounds.
In respect to the above transformation many things including the traditional approaches to management had to be altered in the business environment in order to cultivate effective creativity that promotes the survival of the business in a changing globe. Despite the need for creativity there are still many facts hindering creativity. In this essay the author aims to, (1) explain the shifts that have occurred, (2) the different factors that need to be managed in order to enhance the generation of new ideas, products, services and processes, (3) explain the change management process and recognize its impact on the success of the organization.
1. Myths surrounding creativity
The construct of creativity has a great deal to offer. Creativity is an important component of problem solving. Yet the study of creativity is not nearly as robust as one would expect, due in part to the preponderance of myths and stereotypes about creativity that collectively strangle most research efforts in this area (Plucker, et al, 2004). This part of essay aims to identify a few numbers of myths that hinder the success of creativity.
(a) Creativity is in born
The beauty of creativity is that it is abstract, yet ubiquitous: in art, music or how one decides to compose an essay. However, creativity has recently been declining among the human population. According to an article, named, “The Creativity Crisis,” by Newsweek.com in July 2010, authors, Po Bronson and Ashley Merryman, state, “the Torrance Test … indicates that the public’s “creativity quotient” has steadily crept downward since 1990” (Prompt 1). Bronson and Merryman report that the test, which evaluates one’s creativity, had been dispensed to myriads of people across the globe, and have concluded that creativity has been slowly diminishing. Kyung Hee Kim, professor at the College of William and Mary, also comments that this is most prevalent and grave among students from kindergarten through sixth grade (Prompt 1). Consequently, society, or in this case, the world fears that current students and future generations will not be nourished with the creativity required to thrive as individuals, affecting the world as a whole. Ultimately, this poses the question whether a creative thinking class, which solely focuses on the education of creativity, should be taught in the school. This school should impose a creative thinking class, due to the fact creativity is a vital element for the future and is the solution to the creative crisis.
In the context of creativity’s stated definition, we will proceed to group our arguments into three themes of factors: cognitive ability, expertise training, and environmental conditions. The human brain is highly adaptable and can continue to develop new cognitive abilities, even past adulthood (Norman, 2015). Proper cognitive expertise and training can help workers produce and operate in ingenious ways (Ginamarie, Lertiz & Mumford, 2004). Finally, the working environment can both motivate or stifle creative output. Managers can influence all three components: expertise, thinking skills, and motivation (Amabile, 1998).
The author of this article examines creative culture and societal changes that are making organizations rethink their view on creativity as well as to integrate knowledge of the creative procedure to their own frame of reference, focusing on exploring the 3 primary areas; social trends, creativity and advocacy, whilst also exhibiting deliberation for the intermingling of said themes and exhibits a clear-cut view that creativity and the creative procedure are imperative to the enrichment of the person, corporation and humanity, especially in current times.
Paulus & Nijstad (2003) defined creativity as “the development of original ideas that are useful or influential”(p.3). That is to say,
Creativity is often more about the process rather than the end project, it is useful for many reasons:
The importance of a leader’s ability to embrace and promote change can not be over stated. It is imperative for a leader to understand and manage changes in the work place in order to promote innovation and therefore creativity from the work force. A leader that promotes innovation promotes an environment of change and with it people that are encouraged to accept changes. The leader’s role is very important because they have a duty to create and atmosphere that promotes innovative ideas and changes (Huber, 2014).
Today the way companies are running has changed. The world is driven by intense completion. The demands for workers that have out of box ideas and are creative thinkers have greatly increased. Organizations across the globe however often complain that there is a serious shortage of such creative thinkers with new ideas. Why is there a shortage of such creative employees? It to answer this question that one should read this book. Ken Robinson has successfully answered this question in his book along with other critical questions to provide an effective solution to infuse creativity;
Edith Sodergran put it eloquently when she said, “The inner fire is the most important thing mankind possesses.” She and Professor Michael Starbird share a common perspective on the powerful ability that all individuals are born with when they enter this world. In his lecture, “Elements of Effective Thinking,” Professor Starbird asserts his convictions on the matter of being creative. Creativity resides within everyone, but it flourishes from those who decide to maximize their potential with it. Starbird discusses the importance of fundamentals in what we do and understanding the basics before diving into the nuances of our interests.
Fostering creativity in education is intended to address many concerns. As Parkhurst summarises, this includes “dealing with ambiguous problems, coping with the fast changing world and facing an uncertain future” (Parkhurst, 1999). Other scholars such as Poole (1980) argue
Introduction In this paper I attempt to provide some insight about the teaching of thinking and creativity in schools by drawing parallels between what is found on this subject in the literature, my experience as
How Innovation and Creativity can benefit an organisation, its customers, and stakeholders. The present age of globalisation, deregulation, and acquisitions has led to increased competition and rapid technological advancement. Today’s organisations are increasingly looking toward Creativity and Innovation as a business strategy to enable them to compete and survive. The past widespread use of management initiatives such as, ‘low cost outsourcing’ ‘downsizing ‘business re-engineering’ and over the counter IT enterprise packages ERP, SAP , ‘Six Sigma’/’Kanban’ lean manufacturing have all played their part providing a competitive edge of lower costs and reduced expenses by streamlining internal processes. Nevertheless, with the majority of
In referring to the organization literature, the terms creativity, innovation and change are intimately linked, so it is advisable to clarify their meanings.Hulsheger, et. al., (2009, pp. 1128) distinguishes creativity and innovation. For him, creativity is the thought process that helps us generate ideas. Innovation is the practical
In this essay I will explore the correlation between intelligence (IQ) and creativity (DT), and whether one is influenced or can be predicted by the existence of the other. The relationship between IQ (intelligence quotient) and creativity has been an anchor point for psychological research. Numerous amounts of psychologists have carried out research in order to find evidence to support this idea of a correlation or evidence to disprove the hypothesis that IQ and creativity could be related.
Recently, competition in business seems fiercely competitive. Due to fulfill human’s needs and taste, there are many new companies with their own products and service. However, not all companies can keep competing with other companies, if they cannot find new way to grab customer’s attention. That is one argument why a company needs creative thinking in order to be successful. According to Renee C, creative thinking can keep the company on the top of business and help them to succeed. This essay will describe three significant reasons why business needs to have creative thinking.
Recent years, due to the burst of the businesses, the competition between companies is becoming increasingly fierce. Therefore, creative thinking catches more attentions from businessmen. Serrat (2009) argues that compared with the past time, importance of creative thinking in products, service, procedures, and processes increases. This argument states that the creative thinking plays a significant role in current situation (the fierce competition). The objective of this essay is to discuss the significant role of creative thinking plays in modern enterprises where exist a large requirement of improving quality and function of products, a more