Introduction
This report focus on information gathered from observing and interviewing three diverse fieldwork settings: inclusive classroom setting, self-contained classroom setting and community base agency classroom setting. The information was evaluated by the effective implementation policies related to the collaboration and acceptance for all as well as high expectation for learning for each setting. I also made connection from the information with some theories. Based on the information gathered and analyzed I will give some of my suggestions for improvement where possible.
Inclusive Setting
The school I observed encourages a culture and climate that celebrates diversity and students with and without IEP are playing together. During
…show more content…
Co-teaching also allows more opportunities for small group and one-to-one learning, and stronger modeling during lessons. The teachers work collaboratively when creating lesson plans for the class, and the instructor does not give students different task and the reason for this practice is because the instructor does not want students to work on different task because if someone visits the classroom, they will easily identify the special education students. Therefore, fitting in with the other students and completing the same task is an important way to get them feeling …show more content…
All students in this setting have an IEP, and each child has individual program based on knowledge. The aim is to make students from the routine and direct and negative behavior to functional behavior. The instructors has good communication and work along the parents of each student has a way to get everyone involve. All the recommendations that are made in the classroom are derived from the science and behavioral analysis that is all evidence based and aligned with the New York City standards. The school encourages adequate and daily training for the teachers and they believe successful implementation of the program requires a staff that is willing to learn and implement new information consistently and daily. I notice the instructors use praise to reinforce a student’s good behavior, praise and hand-fives whenever the student does or says the correct thing. There is head special education teacher who creates a lesson or program for each student based upon the student’s academic skills. Upon entering the program, each student is given an assessment test and depending on the result of the assessment test the student will be given a program or lesson based on the result of the assessment. The teacher will go through a set of skills to assess if the student has or does not have
Co teaching and collaboration support inquiry based learning by providing an opportunity for LIMS and teachers to work as partners. The partnership provides learning opportunities for students to become engaged, and immersed in what they are learning. By each person assisting one another they are able to offset one another's weaknesses and strengths while instructing lessons together. This helps everyone involved to be successful. According to Harada and Coatney (2014) "When we make connections beyond the walls of the library to connect our work with classroom teachers and specialist and content'area standards we have the opportunity to become full members of our schools literacy teams. " (p.64)
Interviewing the special education supervisor has made me aware of how important my role is as a regular education teacher to special students who need additional support in my classroom. The goal of the teacher is to ensure that the IEP is followed to ensure the academic success of all students. IEP stands for Individual Education Plan and the plan is usually developed when students have several deficiencies in certain key subject areas such as: reading comprehension, basic reading, reading fluency, written expressions, math calculation, and math reasoning. Students are referred to the special education department usually in elementary school, additionally; according to the high school special education supervisor there are very few referrals
One factor that plays a huge role in successful implementation of integrated co-teaching and has better outcomes for students is when the co-teachers are trained and work together. Magiera and Zigmond (2005) preformed a study at four middle schools in New York that focused on the instructional practices for students with and without disabilities; with teachers who were not trained in integrated co-teaching
The agency is committed to the education and enrichment of Middle School students’ ranging from 11-14 years of age. The counseling department in the school is committed to working with kids with special education needs and providing them service that is outlined in the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) of 2004. Functional Behavior Assessment (FBA) or Individualized Education program (IEP) plans are created to ensure that schools are in compliance with IDEA. These plans are derived through the collaboration with the IEP team, which consist of General Education teachers, the school Social worker, School Counselor, Special Education Educator and parents/guardians of the student. During these meetings,
I was also wondering why there was a shortage of special education teachers as well, I ultimately think it’s because many people believe the teacher pay is not high enough and special education requires a lot additional work such as filling out IEP forms, maintaining a caseload of students, attending IEP meetings and conducting behavior interventions. Coming from someone who loves special education I believe becoming a special education teacher is actually a rewarding job because you get to teach a diverse group of learners. There are a variety of classroom co-teaching methods. Supportive co-teaching often seems to work well in classrooms. When teachers are supportive co-teaching one member of the team is the leader and often teaches the class
Co-teaching is important, especially in the school I did my special education field experience at because they are full inclusion. This school district did co-teaching for math and reading. Students receive their assistance with in the classroom while the teacher is instructing class. It takes a lot of planning and collaboration with the classroom teacher, I believe this is not the most beneficial way to teach students that have learning needs. it can become very distracting for the student because what is going on around them. Learning with their peers is important, the instructions their receiving in the classroom are above their level. I wonder how this is providing the best education possible?
Bessette (2008) considers co-teaching to be “one of the most popular service delivery models for increasing instructional equity for students with disabilities in heterogeneous classrooms” (p. 1376). Dieker explains that students’ needs are better understood in the inclusive setting because the teacher-student ratio is reduced and teachers have more time to pay attention to individual needs. One of the benefits of co-teaching is the unique perspectives and strengths of general educators and special educators teaching approaches and instructional strategies (Friend, Reising, & Cook, 1993). In the collaborative setting, co-teachers work together to develop personal classroom arrangements which best suits their instructional needs. Magiera and Zigmond (2005) point out that the student-teacher ratio is lower, which leads to more positive behavior management as well as two professionals supporting one another. Additionally, this method of inclusion often allows teachers to learn from each other in an environment that is most often highly beneficial for all students (p.79).
I chose to focus on the classroom demographic of the represented special needs in the classroom. Every student in the classroom has an IEP and many different disabilities are represented. Since every student has individual needs, modifications, accommodations, and goals, a cooperative learning instructional strategy is very beneficial in the classroom. Students with similar goals work together in groups on activities to meet their IEP goals. For example, students whose IEPs contain organizational goals, work together on a weekly bag check checklist to ensure they are staying organized and working to meet their goal. By using a cooperative learning style students are able to help and encourage one another in meeting their goals. Since all students
Co-teaching can benefit the students in many ways, it gives students with disabilities the opportunity to be in an
Each child is unique, depending on their roles, skills, and impediments. The co teaching needs to be properly prepared with all the necessary trainings, all the information necessary, about the child to who is going to work on, she will be part of the meetings, she needs to be informed all about the child who’s going to work on that will the co teaching develop and perform their work in a professional manner and let her to achieve the goal set for each
Cooperative learning is more than just letting students sit next to each other and complete an assignment together. If implemented the wrong way cooperative learning can become ineffective for the students, therefor stunting their ability to grow as learners. A cooperative learning environment will exist if groups are structured in a way that group member’s co-ordinate activities to facilitate one another’s learning (Van Dat, 2013). In order to achieve this kind of environment there are five elements that must be present in a cooperative learning classroom: positive interdependence, face-to-face interaction, individual accountability, interpersonal & social skills, and group processing. Let’s look further into these give elements to have a better understanding of cooperative learning. In order for cooperative learning to be successful students need to be able to reflect on what they learned as a group to ensure all members have an
Moreover, despite all those well documented benefits of cooperative learning, many teachers still do not prefer to use this pedagogical practice in class, stated by Baines, Blatchford, and Kutnik (2003). The fact is that the cooperative learning requires teachers to have high awareness of students’ learning, good control of students challenging behaviors.
Cooperative learning is defined in Tran’s article (2013) as “the instructional use of small groups so that students work together to maximize their own and one another’s learning” (as cited in Johnson & Johnson, 1990c). So, in this learning method, the instructors rely heavily on students’ efforts within their groups. Johnson and Johnson (2002) believes that students are given two responsibilities in cooperative learning groups, one of which being to learn the assigned material and the other being to make sure that all other members of their group do likewise. When it comes to the importance of this method, it is obvious that it stems from the number of teachers using
The classroom I am in hosts a diverse group of learners. To give a background of the classroom dynamics we have five students with IEP’s, six struggling readers, some students with RTI’s leading to IEP’s, problematic student behavior, and gifted students. With a variety of student needs, it seems like the class would be a chaotic and imbalanced environment, but it is not. My cooperating teacher, Mrs. Spitz, has created an environment where students receive the utmost curriculum and support. Since my cooperating teacher operates in a co-teaching environment, she only teaches language arts. Her homeroom is her first half of the day, and she switches with Mrs. Shaffer’s homeroom. While I am in the classroom, Mrs. Shaffer’s homeroom is in Mrs.
Lauren Dursky and I decided that we would implement different forms of co-teaching for different subjects. It did not seem efficient to use the same method for each subject, so we decided to vary the instruction. For math, we decided to use station teaching. This allows students to discover a true understanding of each concept through different activities. This style of co-teaching also allows each teacher to incorporate his or her own unique perspective into the classroom. This style could be challenging for math because it requires extra planning and you have to make sure both teachers are teaching similar methods at the same time so movement from one station to the next is smooth.