preview

The Progressive Party Analysis

Decent Essays

AHG 505 #8
Party to end all parties by effecting change to limit importance/power of political parties

Former President Theodore Roosevelt unhappy with his handpicked successor , President Taft’s approach to trust busting, chose to run against him for the Presidency. When he didn’t receive the Republican Party nomination, he ran as the first (and last) candidate for the Progressive Party, nicknaming it after himself, the Bull Moose party. His proposed platform, New Nationalism, laid out very progressive goals, that were much more progressive than any of his ideas while in the White House. It dealt with organized labor, child labor laws, workmans compensation, safety standards, work week hours, and inheritance tax. The New Nationalism also …show more content…

“This right demanded more than writing into law such measures as the direct primary, recall, and referendum. It also required rooting firmly in custom the unwritten law that the people’s representatives derived their authority “directly” from the people” (Milkis). The Progressive Party was a party attempting to end all parties. They “launched a systematic attack on political parties and the critical role these organizations had played in American elections and government. [Progressives] championed instead a fully elaborated “modern” presidency as the leading instrument of popular rule. Public opinion, Progressives argued, now buried by inept Presidents and party bosses, would reach its fulfillment with the formation of an independent executive power, freed from the provincial and corrupt influence of political parties” …show more content…

Once Wilson won, he abandoned his campaign platform and shifted to a progressive platform. Croly celebrated that “The Progressive party is dead, but its principles are more alive than ever, because they are to a greater extent embodied in the official organization of the nation” (Milkis).
Besides the shift in philosophies from constitutionally based to one that was progressively democratic, this election set many important precedents for electoral campaigns. For an election that claimed to represent the common man, it made ensuing elections much more expensive, and much more likely that a common man could ever be elected. It also severely weakened the role of the political party. Taft didn’t campaign for himself, in the traditional style. It had been the political party’s responsibility to campaign for the candidate. “He thought it humiliating to be the first President to have to campaign for his party’s nomination” (Milkis). Whereas Roosevelt used every medium available to him. This marked a shift from the party controlled campaign, to the candidate controlled

Get Access