The significant area of concern for Ernest Frank Pty Ltd (Ernest Frank) is the misuse of their confidential company and client information. It appears that Josephine West (West) has used information obtained in the course of her employment with Ernest Frank and used it for the benefit in her subsequent employment with Hale Bopp Pty Ltd (Hale Bopp).
It is essential that Ernest Frank take immediate steps to protect their intellectual property and to stop any further unauthorised use of their company information by West and Hale Bopp from occurring.
I advise that the protections available to Ernest Frank include the following:
Duty of Confidentiality
It appears that West copied, removed and possibly deleted confidential information, which she had access to during her employment with Ernest Frank. Such conduct by West would fall outside the realm of knowledge acquired by the employee as a routine part of performing their duties, that is, West disclosed information that was not in the public domain.
In Prime Creative Media Pty Ltd v Vranijkova and Motoring Matters Pty Ltd (2010), the Federal Court explained that ‘the protection that should be afforded to information was not afforded due to its confidentiality or from any secrecy surrounding it, but rather afforded protection because of the purpose for which the information had been compiled and because the information was not accessible to those other than business’ employees.’
It is arguable that West’s conduct breached the
1. Data protection: - do not disclose information unless told that it is permitted, it is a criminal offence to breach this law.
Identify relevant legal requirements and procedures covering confidentiality data protection and the disclosure of information.
In this assignment I am going to design a booklet explaining of how national initiatives promote anti-discriminatory practice. I am going to explain an assessment of the influences of a recent national policy initiative promoting anti-discriminatory practice in health and social care settings. Then I am going to evaluate the success of a recent initiative in promoting anti-discriminatory practice.
* Nursing care providers are not covered by this legislation and must make their own arrangements for the disposal of unwanted medicine through a licensed waste management company.
|As a consensus organizer it is important to look for those individuals in the community that are trusted, respected and able to take on the |
Information Commissioner’s Office (2012) Introduction to The Data Protection Act 1998. [Online] Available from: http://www.ico.org.uk/~/media/documents/library/Corporate/Research_and_reports/ico_presentation_EVOC_20120528.ashx [Accessed: 11th October 2013]
-3 x 1.66 pts. = minus 5 pts. = 45 pts. out of 50 pts. = 90%
But for another example a pizza shop in competition wit a fried chicken shop would be indirect because the products are not the same but they are still competing for sales.
What is the probability of rolling a four in the gambling dice game of craps (given two six sided dice)? 3/36 or 8.33%. What is the probability that a player can roll a four 3 times in a row (assume that rolling the dice each time does not affect the outcome of the next roll)? 3/36 x 3/36 x 3/36 = 27/46656 = 3/5184
My interest for the Attorney Advisor position with the United States Patent & Trademark Office (USPTO) arises from my longstanding commitment to constantly improve myself. I have always enjoyed legal research, writing, and the complexities of intellectual property. I have no doubt that my enthusiasm to research, my eagerness to learn, and my strong ability to communicate clearly, work efficiently, accurately, and quickly, will make me an invaluable asset to the USPTO. I believe these traits combined with my unique skillset, developed as a result of experiences working for the Arizona Diamondbacks of Major League Baseball (Diamondbacks), Nike Inc. (Nike), and the Arizona Attorney General’s Office, Liability Management Department (AG Office)
' responsibility to ensure that it is never abused and is not to the determent of the company ( Privacy in the Workplace , 2005
The Freedom of information Act 2000 gives people the right to access recorded information for public sector organisations. The Act determines that it would be reasonable for the company to disclose policies surrounding HRM and certain types of data such as numbers of employees, diversity information, the pay of some employees (very senior staff), pay bands and details of expenses. Some personal information may be released providing it does not breach data protection laws
The case study focuses on an employee, Paul Keller, who is being affected by a number of factors. His job performance is hindered by constraints such as his work environment, his home environment, stressors, mood, and the management style of his superior. The case study demonstrates how his job performance is affected and what the consequences could be as a result of his poor job performance and lack of concentration.
Carl violated UPL for failure to identify himself to Jane and Zeke as a paralegal, setting fees and giving legal advice. Carl violated confidentiality by allowing Zeke to sit in on the meeting. Carl and Howe violated confidentiality by allowing Jane and Zeke in Howe’s office where confidential files were in plain view. Carl violated confidentiality by speaking about Jane’s case in the reception area where other clients could hear. Carl violated UPL by giving legal advice. Howe allowed Carl to engage in UPL and did not properly supervise Carl.
Issue 3: Has Patricia improperly used company information to gain advantage for herself and/or her sister?