Organizations are groups of people working together to achieve a common goal. The organizations theories correlate together in order for organizations to sustain functionality. In all organizations there is a common unit of power that directs the organization toward a common goal. Within the Department of Health and Human Resources, the source of power is the commissioner, and the direction of the department is to have zero child fatalities and maintain safety of children.
The classical model focuses on the structure of the organization. The decision making starts at the top, with the person in power and trickles down to the employees in the organizations. Hence, the person in power has the authority and decision making capability. This is also known as bureaucracy, which occurs within a government institution such as; when meetings occur, the commissioner will make the final decisions about goals and how to implement those goals. All organizations recognize that decisions have to be made. The decision theory is similar to the classical model in how decisions are made and who makes the decisions. The person in power makes the decision, and the ultimate outcome is to achieve a common goal. Decisions are made on rationale when possible, but achieving a perfect goal is not the ultimate goal. When conflict occurs it is embraced, and organization work to accommodate or even coerce members to achieve common goals. Human relations theory is derived from the machine
Organization theory is about ideas and principles that flow within an association on how work can be done by investigating through different perspective. It is important to study organization as improvements can be carried out to make sure organizations are performing efficiently through developing the organizations structure and mission statement. (Developing an enabling organisational culture, changing organisational culture.). (See Apendix A for some applications of organizational Theory). There are three major perspectives-modernism, symbolic interpretive, and postmodernism to look at organisation which provide broad frameworks to guide our thinking and research. In this essay paper, an effort has been made in discussing how the three
When looking back at all of the weekly written assignments there are a few things I should note. There were some questions like naming the ‘theories of rationality’ in the written assignments which I did not yet fully grasp at the moment of answering the questions. When I look back at the first assignment I now understand what was asked of me. To some degree, this also applies to some of the other exercises. What I have noticed is that my writing skills have improved hugely thanks to the Organization Theory course, which can be seen in the difference in quality between my first assignment and this final essay.
Organizations have become important social institutions that affect nearly everyone's life in one way or another. However, there are many different perspectives that can be used in understanding these organizations. Theorists have produced many different ideas about the best vantage point in which to try to understand how an organization functions. Furthermore, it is important for leaders in the organization to understand these theories so that they can tailor their own concepts and theories and the organizations in which they are members of. This translates in the need for multiple perspectives to be used in the pursuit of understanding an organization and how it functions.
There is a common method for both public and private companies, allowing them to improve efficiency in their processes and activities. This method is known as Organizational Benchmarking, which is defined as the process of identifying, learning and applying best practices of other successful companies in the market (Gibson, L and Glenn, E., 2000). In other words, this process is based on the analysis of how other companies conduct their business and adapt to another company to improve efficiency.
1) Describe the internal and external factors that have defined and shaped your organization in terms of its size, organizational structure, and processes
Organizational theory studies various organizations to identify the patterns and structures, the organizations use to sort out the problems they face, to maximize their efficiency and productivity of goods or services they provide, and meet the expectations of stakeholders. Organizational theory then uses these patterns to introduce standard theories of how organizations can do their best. It includes the study of behaviour of groups and individuals working in an organisation as well. Therefore, organizational theory is used to learn the best ways to achieve its major goals.
Each organization has an individual organizational behaviour that can be described through the organizational mix consisting of the five issues listed previously.
Today we will look at Company B. We will begin with an overview of the organization, what category of industry it falls under, and some of the products the organization offers. Next, we will explore the current status in the organization, that is, the current state of affairs in the organization with regard to products as well as the internal organizational structure, the factors that contribute to the structure, the effectiveness of the structure. Then we will investigate the steps the company has taken to modify how it views innovation and how this has affected the organization’s strategy. The first potion of this presentation will conclude with a discussion of potential advantages and disadvantage of the current
Over the years, most organizations have been urged to consider changing their organizational structure so as to promote employee flexibility as well as empower them with the discretion of making decisions. As a result, organizations across the world have resorted to de-layering or flattening their organizational structures with the hopes of achieving employee flexibility and improving the operations of the organization as well. De-layering or flattening, in this case, refers to the elimination of certain layers in an organization’s hierarchy and the broadening of the span of control of managers. Research has indicated that pushing down the process of decision making to the lower organization levels not only makes employees responsible for their actions but also promotes accountability (Hirsch & De Soucey, 2006). It should, however,be noted that these changes in organizational structure have also left organizations in the midst of chaos. In fact, as organizations delayer their structure and downsize their labor force, employees, as well as managers, find themselves in working environments that have redefined their work as well as the corporate culture.
Organizational design identifies through various steps and if there are any flawed aspects to the structure, procedures, workflow or technical systems. Once the flaws have been identified in an organization a plan is developed and then implemented to ensure that the new objectives are met. This week’s assignment required a review and analysis of the article, Dr. Gayle Brings Collaboration to Care. Also, student were asked to identify the methodology used and to offer suggestions.
Organizations are a social unit of people that is structured and managed to meet or pursue
An organization is defined as a group of people who work together in an organized way for shared purpose. When people come together, they can either compliment one another or potentially create conflicts and disagreements in the course of pursuing common objectives with their differentiated experiences, perceptions and knowledge.
This week in class we went over the concept of organizational structure, which to my understanding is the level of hierarchies, the division of departments and the communication across these hierarchies and departments within organizations. In terms of ensuring communication the structure includes a control system to ensure information flows through vertical and horizontal information linkages. The idea of information and control systems are components of organization design. This new learned knowledge helps with the development of my first goal as it is another component of organizational design, allowing me to actually apply it. For example, drawing back to my organization experience with Continental Grand Buffet, the information flowed through a horizontal structure and linkage. This is because there was less stress on hierarchies within the restaurant. We also had greater horizontal communication, in other words we communicated face to face, whether it was the manager with the hostess, the servers, the chefs and even the owners. In addition, we often shared tasks, where just because I was a hostess I could not go and assist or train one of the servers, and this empowerment that existed within the restaurant reflects that horizontal information linkage, where we had greater unity and information and communication travelled through the many different ‘divisions’.
The network of Western-made NGOs established in various countries turned out to be so moveable and "hungry" in terms of finance, that even small financial injections began to yield the expected results. For example, as it mentioned above a civil society support program was developed, funded by USAID. The program was aimed at strengthening civil society through the support of local civil society institutions and initiative communities in Central Asia. The Council for International Research and Exchanges (IREX), which carried out the program in Uzbekistan during 2005, required to unite disparate groups of non-state, non-profit organizations into an effective sector. In Uzbekistan, seven regional centers for the support of civil society
Here in MOD 5 at Post University, I took a class called Elements of Organization with Professor Danielle Courtemanche. Throughout the 8-week course, I learned how to think critical, the difference between a manager and a leader, leadership styles, moral codes, how to create SMART Goals, effective communication and so much more. At the start of the course, I personally didn’t totally understand what an Organization really was nor did I understand the different Elements of it. Below I’ll reference a few things so that anyone reading this can become more knowledgeable about the Elements of Organization.