Trapping Today Should be Legal, but Limited
Trapping is a very important issue, which is connected to many other larger issues. For instance, trapping lies at the heart of the First
Nation's distinct society issue. Before I talk about the present, however,
I would like to discuss whether trapping should have been illegal when
Canada was first being settled in the 17th and 18th centuries.
When the first explorers came to the new world, it was regarded as a huge slab of worthless rock standing between Europe and the riches of the
Orient. The only reason these explorers even explored this continent was the hope of finding the North-West passage, a route to the Orient.
Fortunately, while searching for this North-West
…show more content…
Relations with the Indians were shaky, at best. Some Indians befriended the French, and some befriended the English. Some just gave their furs to the highest bidder. The relationship with the Indians was more than just a trade agreement. The wars of the Indians were the wars of the French. Now, imagine what would happen if one day, an Indian came to a
Frenchman and offered him a pelt. The Frenchman tells the Indian that not only will he not buy it, but no Frenchman in New France will. Not only that, trapping furs in the forests belonging to the French was not allowed. The relationships with the Indians which had taken so long to establish would be shattered in days. The Indians would probably recognize the French as their enemies. Now not only the enemies of the Indian "friends" of the
French would attack them, but also their "friends". Settlers would again become afraid to come to New France because of the fierce Indian attacks.
The French colony in New France would cease to exist. Therefore, I think trapping should have been legal then. Now that I have talked about fur trapping then, I'll talk about it now. Unfortunately, it is much more complicated now. Animal rights activists have told us that it is wrong to kill an animal for its fur. I strongly agree with this opinion, especially since man-made fur is so accessible. Unfortunately, there are people who
There are many reasons that the Europeans and the Native Americans didn’t get along. In the works that I have examined and read throughout this module, the relationship amongst these two groups had not been a good one from the beginning. The main reason for conflict between the Europeans and the Native Americans, it seems, was the Europeans greed and desire for land and power.
The diplomatic agreements between First Nations and Europeans were built on pre-contact foundations. Europeans inherited sets of relationships and rivalries among Aboriginal peoples into which the newcomers had to fit themselves. But, as in the case of commercial relations, the insertion of the Europeans, with their different interests and strengths, into pre-existing political systems complicated and modified indigenous alignments. This relationship between the Europeans and the First Nations was a very important development in both European Western development and First Nations attempt to expand their technological expansion. From the very first days of their presence in northeastern North America, Europeans encountered First Nations well versed in creating political agreements among themselves by means of kinship and ritual. The Europeans were not the only people who had their own way to get through the treaties; the First Nations people did too.
The history of the Native Americans after the arrival of the Europeans is a history of wars, treaties and agreements, and broken treaties and broken agreements. As late as 1994 the governing bodies of tribal communities have signed treaties and agreements with the U.S. (Niles, 1996). As recently as 1999 the U.S. Supreme Court almost overturned treaty rights of the Chippewa Indians of Minnesota.
Coming from an economic standpoint, the Europeans and Indians were such total opposites, it often led to misunderstanding. Indians had very large trading routes well before the time of European colonization. Their experience in trade only made it easier to exchange goods with the Europeans. For Indians, trading was a way to acquire goods they wanted, but also a way to share the wealth of their land with other tribes that didn't have the same items to trade as they did. To the
Although the Spaniards and English were greeted with hospitality, food, and gifts they still sought war because it was not enough. Zinn mentions this quote,“They willingly traded everything they owned…”, which shows that Cortes and Columbus were both greeted by the Indians with kindness. However, they both used that to their advantage tricking them into slavery and oppression. “he was so anxious to please the King that he committed
European explorers first landed on the shores of what would later become North America more than 500 years ago. Not long after the first explorers had entered the "New World" they found out that they were not alone on this new frontier. Their neighbors in this new land were the Native Americans who had been there for centuries, virtually unaware of life outside the continent. Thus began an inconsistent and often times unstable relationship between the European settlers and the North American Indians. Two nations who had particularly interesting relationships with the Native Americans were the British and the French, both of whom took different approaches to their relations with the Indians economically as well
The arrival of the ‘foreigners’, as referred to by the Native Americans, turned a new stone in Native American diplomacy. No longer did they have to only deal with neighboring tribes, as they were forced to endeavor into politics with strangers who were looking to take their land. The first relationship between the pilgrims and the Native Americans began with the Wampanoag tribe. The relations between the two groups paved the view that the pilgrims had towards the Indians. The decently friendly relationship that stood between the two groups was short lived as the pilgrims felt that the indians were getting in the way of their expansion; and shortly after the friendship ceased to exist (Bell, 37).
27) Indian Wars: The Indian Wars were the battles and conflicts between Great Plains Indians and settlers. The Battle of Little Bighorn was the only battle the Indians won. They eventually stopped resisting and were moved to reservations.
In the time period of 1800-1850 white Americans expanded across the vast lands on the western side of the continent and regularly encountered conflict with various Indian nations. In these documents, interactions for the various Indian nations were subjected to different cultivation between each tribe per say that there were responses that filled different needs and demands. Some tribes provided benefits such as agriculture and household manufacture and produced the idea that settlements to be blended and conform into one people. Other interactions created conflict because some of our land purchases were not 100% in compliance with the constitution. Yet some Indian nations
The Native Americans wanted to trade and help the Early Settlers out, but the Early Settlers refused any help and refused to trade. “Communication and Trust are two main ingredients for a successful RELATIONSHIP.” (Unknown). The Early Settlers did not trust the Native Americans, they thought differently and lived a different lifestyle . The Early Settlers also did not want any Communication at all with the Native Americans. The Native Americans wanted to trade and wanted to communicate with the Early Settlers but they wouldn’t. The Native Americans also wanted to trust the Early Settlers but it is hard to trust someone who doesn’t trust you. Therefore, they couldn’t have a relationship. “The House stood upon the edge of a Hill; some of the Indians got behind the Hill, others into the Barn, and others behind anything that would shelter them” (Rowlandson, J.). The Native Americans wanted to go there and offer a trade and wanted to form a relationship but was shut down so they tried to force one, they think that if they kidnap people, the Early Settlers will want to agree to get their people back. It did not work that way so they had a battle. When they went into battle it was led to believe that it was the start of their war. The Native Americans really tried to form a relationship but could not due to the Early Settlers not wanting to do such a
How did contact between the European arrivals and the native peoples of the Americas affect both groups?
Even before the war, the native economy was vulnerable due to its dependency on the English. Ever since the Indians had met the English, they had grown increasingly dependent on European trade goods such as muskets, liquor, and metal tools. Suddenly, with hostilities between them and the English flaring up, and trade grinding to a halt, the Indians lost access to these trade goods that had become their way of life. In order to deal with trade grinding to a halt, some Indian tribes allied with the English against their fellow tribes. Even in King Philip’s War, the Pequots, Mohegans, Niantics, and other Indian tribes allied with the English against their brother Indians to keep trading rights with the English (Philbrick 302). Philip was even killed in battle by a Pocasset warrior (Philbrick 336). Another way the Indians sought to keep trade flowing was by initiating trade relations with multiple European powers instead of just relying on one. However, when one European nation emerged victorious and drove out the other powers, the Indians were once again placed at the mercy of one nation. Although their strategy of doing trade with multiple nations protected their economic lifestyle for a little longer, it occasionally failed, and at best, it only served to postpone European invasion and economic
Remaining as distant as possible, the Iroquois played a large role in trade between the British and Native Americans. In efforts to gain support
In 1620, the first batch of European settlers come to New England area. They are hoping to live peacefully with Indians since the settlers demand to receive food and supplies from the Indians. Meanwhile, the new immigrants clearly understand that they are weak and inferior. Once if they have conflicts with Indians, they have no chance to win the battle. Another major reason that French and Britain need to ally with Native Americans in the early 17th century is because the idea of mercantilism. Since they believe that the wealth of nation should mainly from trading, both nations want to have more profit from fur trading. European settlers and Indians also exchange crops, tools, and know-how. Likewise, Indians want the new immigrants to be their allies to defeat enemies in the future days. However, the problems egress inevitably. Because of the largely different beliefs on lands owning and religion, even more migration of population, and external diseases, European settlers and Indians break their peace and enter wars soon after.
Dunbar knows that the arrival of American troops in the frontiers will only be a matter of time. Soon, he has to make the decision whether he wants to stick to his new friends or go back to his fellow soldiers and fight against the Indians. When Dunbar rides back to his post to get his journal, American soldiers are gathered around his post. They see him coming and shoot his horse. Since Dunbar is wearing a Sioux gown, the troops look at him as a trader and treat him brutally. When the soldiers are on their way to the next village to have Dunbar hanged, the Sioux attack, and rescue their friend, Dunbar. Back at the Indian camp, Dunbar and his wife decide to leave the Sioux. John Dunbar knows that he is a wanted man now.