preview

Case Analysis: Wal-Mart Stores: „Everyday Low Prices“ in China

Better Essays

Case Analysis: Wal-Mart Stores: „Everyday Low Prices“ in China I. Introduction Within less than 30 years, Wal-Mart had transformed from a small rural retailer in Arkansas into the largest retailer in the U.S. In order to continue this rapid growth, the company had started to pursue international expansion grounded in the belief that the firm’s business model of offering quality products at low prices and great customer service would appeal to consumers everywhere around the world (p.8)[1]. China was of particular interest in going international as Wal-Mart’s top management held the opinion that it was the only market in which the firm’s success story in the U.S. could be repeated (p.2/8). However, in 2005 (nine years after its …show more content…

Regulations & Local Protectionism Wal-Mart’s expansion in China had been hindered and slowed down by regulatory restrictions for a long time. Thus, international retailers were limited to certain cities, in which not more than three stores were allowed. Additionally, each new store needed the approval of the central government. Furthermore, enforcement of local interest such as tax revenues or jobs and local protectionism by local governmental agencies handicapped Wal-Mart’s expansion in China. As a result, the retailer had only 43 stores in China by early 2005 (p.12-14). Restrictions in Distribution and Logistics China’s underdeveloped infrastructure, in particular the land transport system and connection between different forms of transportation, slowed down distribution, increased logistic costs, and finally hindered expansion into rural regions (p.13). As a result of this slow transportation, Wal-Mart’s two distribution centers couldn’t serve the entire country adequately. On the other hand, these distribution centers were significantly underused due to small amount of stores. Consequently, the retailer couldn’t benefit from cost saving through its distribution approach (p.14). Furthermore, communication with the retailer’s 15,000 local suppliers was inefficient and costly due to the lack of an information-technology network (p.14). Nevertheless, the

Get Access