What Is Military Perfecting

In addition, this document will highlight the importance of an effective leadership style, focusing on the proper use of intelligence assets and the welfare of soldiers in order to accomplish the mission during war.

Remember that culture is the way things are done at a certain place and it derives mostly from the ethics, and priorities that an organization sets. We also examined the chain of command within the Army. There are chains of command in every workplace but the Army’s is a very complicated system and it allows everybody to know their roles within the organization, it also allows people to advance which boosts morale and self-esteem. This paper also informed about the Operations Process which is the way that decisions and missions are carried out within the Army. Remember that there are four parts of the Ops Process that can be applied to any task in our daily lives; Plan, Prepare, Execute and Assess. In conclusion, even though people may not think of America’s soldiers as managers, they are. They are managers because from day one they are forced into leadership roles and they are taught these management processes. The Army requires Specialists and Corporals to complete 80 hours of training, called Structured Self Development (SSD), in order to be eligible for promotion to Sergeant. The training teaches the Army culture, management styles, Army regulations and more. It is very important to teach all workers at every level, how to effectively manage and lead because eventually they will be the ones making the calls and tough

“Leadership is about people; management is about things. Successful commanders understand they are equally responsible for both.” 1 Finding a balance between executing the mission and taking care of the people is one of many challenging tasks for a commander. This paper will cover three elements. Specifically, I will discuss my leadership philosophy as commander of my unit discussing such items as a description of my philosophy, and my thoughts on key traits required for a successful leader. Next, I will examine an interview conducted with a commander to gain an in depth look at one of the most challenging leadership decisions he has experienced. Finally, I will provide an analysis of the interviewee’s actions, and compare his actions to my leadership philosophy.

The United States Army is a thriving military force that has safeguarded America’s homeland for over 241 years and continues the fight for everlasting freedom. The Army’s success lies in its ability to adapt but most importantly the Army’s triumph lies within Soldiers who are groomed into leaders. In my opinion, leaders are expected to uphold the standards and become a source of motivation that followers gravitate towards. The dictionary definition of leadership is simply the action of leading a group of people but everybody has their own method in doing so. In this short paper, I will provide my leadership philosophy and establish my standpoint as an Army leader.

A recent survey done by the United States Army confirms what most knowledgeable and professional

The mixed method has recently become a popular method of research. Analyze and compare the mixed method, qualitative and quantitative research methods. Evaluate the effectiveness of each as a valid method of research on models of military leadership.

Since I entered into the military school, this term “the leadership” has encompassed me. Many senior officers I recognized told me that leadership is an art, because it could be conducted by whichever you employ and it has no any standard answer. What is a good leader? The one who treats you well or guide you to an appropriate way. What kind of characteristic should a leader possess? The one who can boost the morale of a group. How to become a leader? To be a leader need continuing training and educating, or it requires a gift. No one has a specific description. Today, I am going to discuss this topic and to share personal experiences of the leadership through my 18- year military life.

Due to its purpose, the military has always been known to produce quality leaders. From George Washington to John F. Kennedy, the list goes on and on. The military’s rich history has afforded scholars the opportunity to dissect how leadership is developed in the military. People can look to the military for guidance on effective leadership because officers “… are trained for high-stakes positions at a young age and are sometimes thrown into those roles with no warming.” (The Different Ways Military Experience Prepares Managers for Leadership, p. 82) According to Professor Michael Useem author of “Four Lessons in Adaptive Leadership,” leadership development is best derived from the military as the “environment creates a culture of readiness

I believe that a good military leader builds a relationship with his followers who feel motivated by it and work diligently to get the job done. This is achieved by a leader who make conscientious efforts to gain thorough knowledge of his personnel background, habits, strengths and weaknesses. A leader who develops an understanding about how his men react under various conditions will employ them successfully. Personnel desire to satisfy their physical, mental and spiritual needs form the basis of their

Leadership, be it on the battlefield or an organization, is extremely important. Leaders are like the pole star, showing the right direction to disoriented people, making them aware of their internal powers, their strengths, the goals they are expected to attain and then finally stirring them to do so- Making them thrusting individuals who then not only develop themselves but also benefit the whole team. And throughout this course and even after that a leader, as the name itself suggests, pilots the way setting an example for the upcoming chiefs. Furthermore, the terms leadership and management can be quite confusing and used interchangeably by many but that should not be the case. (Burns, 1978)

Leadership by definition is very broad. Understanding leadership Roles and Responsibilities is simply a start to the understanding of what leadership in the Army entails. Leadership in the Army is defined as the ability to influence others to accomplish the mission to arrive a final state of resolve. Exploring two major types of leadership and the scope of responsibility is the overall purpose of this paper. The two discussed levels of leadership is the Direct Leadership and the Organizational Leadership. The goal is to focus on the differences between the two types and gain a better understanding of the roles leaders play within the two types of leadership. While roles and functions are comparable, they are not the same.

Officers are assumed to be natural born leaders and the initial enhancement of these skills are to take place during the length of their four-year degree with the guidance of The Reserve Officer’s Training Corps (ROTC). ROTC broadly introduces students to different leadership styles and how to apply them to scenarios that may arise throughout the duration of their career. The instructors in an ROTC program are composed of non-commissioned officers who are enlisted soldiers that rise through the ranks and become the direct supervisors of lower enlisted soldiers. Non-commission officers can guide with the experience they possess and commissioned officers lack. Officers commission into the military with the intent to maintain a supervisorial position throughout their whole career but in various positions and ranks. In a study conducted about military leadership, Utecht and Heier(1976) refered to leadership competence as the deciding factor that moves officers among various levels in the military. Officers are expected to be multifaceted and easily adapt to the conditions and requirements of any given position.

The comparison of each article reveals a complex, however, well written article by both authors. Connelly, et al (2000) empirical research article on exploring leadership skills and knowledge relationship was organized, and began with an explanation of the study, the criterion-related validity, and core aspects of leader capabilities among military leaders. The literature review used secondary headings to separate the subtopics by theoretical issues, existing research, and methods. The discussion format was correlated as the literature reviewed leadership skills, characteristics and their relationship on leader performance.

Becoming a great leader is most often defined by the successes achieved at the end of the day. Leaders are needed to exhibit personal strengths from their focus, self-belief, vision, integrity and courage while carrying out the course of duty (Howard & Paret, 1989). Add on to this factors like commitment, goal visibility, teamwork and such executable factors, and the modelling of a great leader comes to fruition. Some leaders believe in the end justifying the means, others taking more psychological approaches, and all of these approaches help distinguish the military and civilian skills in leadership.

Leaders can be influential to their soldiers through psychological and institutional level. First, by being a “strong” person who embodies the ideals of the society, such as having “charisma”, being able to convene political negotiations, having a good personality and people managing skills, a leader can serve as a mental foundation of the unit that holds people from having emotional breakdowns. “Charisma” needs to be differentiated with authoritarianism, in that it may