What role does community planning have in economic development?

COMMUNITY – there are numerous of problems to faced in a community. Like poverty, violence and crime, and low income and inability to ensure basic goods and services, and discrimination.

A country’s success is built on strong communities. Investing in communities is not only about creating jobs and economic growth; it is also about building communities people are proud to call home. Communities should be safe, self-sufficient and provide a variety of services to their members. With targeted investment in land, economic development, community infrastructure, support for First Nations governance structures, and focus on the environment, the Government of Canada will support Indigenous communities to achieve these goals.

reader infers that there is a specific life plan for each individual in this society. The author also

Community development involves changing the relationships between ordinary people and people in positions of power, so that everyone can take part in the issues that affect their lives. It starts from the principle that within any community there is a wealth of knowledge and experience which, if used in creative ways, can be channeled into collective action to achieve the communities' desired goals.

The Promise zone initiative is designed to redevelop high poverty dominated areas through inclusive, evidence- based strategies and helping local leaders take the helm of federal funding. Due to disinvestment and poor policy implementation that isolated poor, have contributed to areas of concentrated poverty all over the country. The Promise Zones initiative will revitalize high poverty communities across the country by attracting private investment, providing affordable housing, creating educational opportunities, providing tax incentives for hiring workers and reducing violent crime, and supporting local leaders in navigating federal programs. The economic nature of this policy is allocation of services and redistributing

To clarify, the high rents and prices of products around the neighborhood prevent the low-income families to enhance their economy. For example, Knafo writes “Through rezoning, tax abatement for developer, and the privatization of public spaces, local governments and federal agencies often work to change low-income neighborhood at the encouragement of developers, they argue (Knafo 3).”/ “the ultimate hope of building support policies that protect low-income renters, particularly renters of color, from getting priced out of their communities (Knafo 6).” This illustrates that low-income people are being exclude from the developments for the reason that the excessive high prices and rent they need to pay. Although many people as Local governments and federal agencies might object that this developments are an advantages for the county economy, I maintain, this prejudiced the low-income families that cannot afford high rates in prices in their community. Therefore, I conclude that gentrification is a disruption of prosperity for the low-income

The importance of understanding the community cannot be overstated. Most people access resources at the community level, regardless of whether the program funding originates at the local, state, or national level. It is at the community level that government is potentially most responsive to individual citizens. Quality-of-life issues are most profoundly confronted at the local level.

Fortunately, there are more than one type of housing that tailor to different needs and wants. For instance, the Regent Park located in Downtown Toronto is used to serve people with financial needs. In some places, such as California and Florida, it is even a law for low-income housing production (Ramsey-Musolf, 2017). However, simply building properties would not solve the issue. Planners should also take into consider why people are not able to afford a property. There has been research show that there is a link between local comprehensive plans and affordability (Jun, 2017). For example, one of the reasons why young adults are living with parents is because of economic pressure. Planners need to consider whether it is appropriate to create commercial areas so that people could have a job close to home and be able to save money for future property purchase. The housing issue has existed for more than a century, it cannot be tackled within a short period of time. Planners should adjust their plans accordingly to solve this issue bit by

In the US and in most countries, communities are more than just houses, departments, grocery stores and shops. Communities are formed by its civilians to facilitate their way of life and to also be a team instead of just single individuals. These communities are formed by the people living in that area and the values they share. Kekes (1993) defines values as ‘humanly caused benefits that human beings provide to others…’. Kekes and kane also states that they espouse values such as empowerment and caring , not just because they lead towards good or better society but also because they have merit on their own (kane, 1994: Kekes, 1993) CP, p54.

Lack of evenly distributed prosperity in Durham has been at the forefront of the mayoral election. Martin posed a question to the candidates regarding the city’s growth but inability of citizens’ to reap the benefits of its development; and how they would handle this if elected as mayor. Ali readily responded, “As we see growth in our city occurring, making sure we have policy for inclusion is important” and added an antedote about the drastic improvements his non-profit, working in conjunction with the city of Durham, had on minority and women-owned firms, underscoring his experience and enthusiasm to help all of Durham. Ali finally noted that I elected, his goal is prosperity “not just for the big people or the companies or the organizations that we are contracting with, but to make sure that we are able to spread that around so that other people can participate in this prosperity”.

Getting members of the community involved in governing and decision-making is important. Implementing programs like the participatory budgeting one found in at least one New York City council district. In such programs, a community's residents have access to a certain portion of the district's annual budget and through a series of neighborhood assemblies and public meetings over the course of several months, residents brainstorm ideas of projects that are needed in their neighborhoods. At the end of the process, the residents get to vote on the project proposals to choose which ones are most important to the community and the projects receiving the most votes get implemented (“What do you want in out neighborhood”). In programs like these, people in low-income, majority minority neighborhoods are able to be part of the decision-making process and projects that are important to them can get done. Though participation in participatory budgeting programs in U.S. municipalities has a lot of room for growth, it's things like this that can help mobilize minority groups and encourage participation in the local political

The purpose of this paper is to design a comparative case study that will reveal a viable solution toward desegregation in community planning. The study will answer the question of why segregation persist in modern America and how can community planning desegregate communities in the future. By answering preliminary questions of: What is housing segregation and what are the problems, as a result? What are the casual effects on modern community planning? Can solutions be implemented to desegregate housing for community planning in the future? The intended use of this framework will be to influence both policy makers and community planners toward desegregation.

In previous community development research, Bhattacharyya (2004) finds that locality has been used as a proxy for community development. He argues that it is becoming analytically irrelevant

Community is established locally but community development is a process that includes actors from inside and outside of the community to achieve sustainability. My previous essays have addressed the progression of community development from place-based attachment, organizing and advocacy to addressing the need and effect of government involvement. The final stop on the continuum of the community development is to analyze market-based approaches to community development. This paper will look at how a market based approach to community development is an important component of community development because it is the appropriate response to the current socio-economic, and political context that our country is in. A market-based approach provides a mechanism to define relationships and allocate economic resources to create systemic change within communities. increasing opportunities for social inclusion and economic sustainability

The strength of this definition is the simplicity itself. What site readiness specifically means for one community does not, and should not, mean the same thing to every other community competing for economic growth. Thus, the strength in the theory is that each community must take time to be introspective and decide a vision for the future. The very first question a community needs to answer is “What is the community’s preferred and rational economic development opportunities?” Even in academic circles, there is not standard consensus among academics as to a solitary definition of economic development. “Growth in per capita income, change in wealth, change in employment, change in both population and employment, and growth in business ” can all be contemplated as a part of the concept of economic development. The lack of specific meaning of economic development is reflected in the definition provided by the American Economic Development Council. It defines economic development as “the process of creating wealth using all resources. ” Even this definition is ambiguous and unclear, because the notion of wealth is not