Why Is King Arthur Better Than The Movie

Was Arthur the single hero that bathed in the glory and honor or did he take the honor away from the people who helped him through his endeavors? Such as Merlin he got no recognition for his immense amount of help for making Arthur king which established the round table to make no single lead but everyone was like their own lead. -storytime- Ugh echoes through his head as the boy types away like a slave in a work camp that’s supposed to make the children successful in their later years but failed miserably to only push the quickest of learners ahead at the cost to push the children who are inclined to go towards their dream in the dust to fade away in a broken system that for many only makes them hate life more and more each day as their

In my sixteen years of living, throughout my life, I’ve mostly been told that that the book is better than the movie. From Harry Potter to the Hunger Games, most readers tend to feel that the book is able to capture more. More description, more development, more dynamic, they would say, just to name a few. Now I’d never really fallen into that presumption, as I prefer to give each book and movie separate chances and never truly compare the two. Until I read It’s Kind of a Funny Story.

I personally liked the book The Hobbit better than the movie. I liked the book better because it provided a more vivid experience, provided more story, and gave us more of Bilbo’s perspective because we could know what he was thinking. Finally, The Hobbit and its movie are similar and different from each other in a variety of ways such as the start of the adventure, the way Bilbo changed, how backstory is told, and character

In Le Morte d’Arthur, King Arthur the Great was in fact a great man put in an even greater trial.

I feel like if a new person who has never even heard of the story, would have a harder time understanding the plot in the story. If they were to watch the movie though, I feel they would have a better grasp on the concept. In the book it was hard to tell what was going on, it went from one place to the other. The movie you were able to see what was happening, making it more understandable.

The movie house of usher was better than the book because people can listen and watch understand it better if people not good at picturing the book while reading it.movie is quicker too than book people read books in days,People can watch a movie in two hours.

There are many times in entertainment history that the movie is better than the book. Books are well detailed, spread out, and are successful if the author is good. But movies are inspired and adapted to bring a much more compelling story. In movies, actors and directors constantly are inspired to expand upon the story, yet also bring emotions that the books don't always capture. Therefore, if done correctly, the movie should be creatively adapted from the original book

Have you ever wonder if it was worth it to read the book? People have always wondered which was better. Reading can help improve your memory, concentration, and brain function. People have always had their own opinions about which is better. I personally believe that reading the book is better than the movie.

The movie wasn`t that good because setting was not good, it must happen in Rome. Setting change the viewer might don`t know when will this happen. Acting was little bad to me and to others like baby. I saw this movie and it was cruel. It was cruel for many ways. First, they cut their head, to me it was barbarous. Second, were they put the sword inside their stomach. It was little cruel. It has 18+ in the middle of the film. To me and people who are pure will don`t like it.

My conclusion is. That really it depends on what you find more entertaining reading or watching movies personally I find movies because like I explained movies have numerous advantages which include: they visualise thing in more detail, they are viable for all ages and you don't have to one to read/watch the other. Those are the reasons why I strongly believe that film adaptations of books are

I enjoyed reading the book.I also enjoyed reading the book with my 6 grade classine . I was also very proud of reading 400 pages now,I’ll tell you why the book better.The reasons the book is better than the movies is because the book includes more action,includes all scenes and good storyline/characters.

Reading the book and watching the movie has always been a fierce debate on which is better. Every person has their own argument. I have heard people say all these things; that the absorption into the world is better in a movie, but the pace and detail are better in a book.

Few works of literature or legend are as varied as that of King Arthur and his round table, forever retold by each generation. Without question, the defining work of Arthurian Literature is Sir Thomas Malory's Le Morte d'Arthur. Morte d'Arthur is a compilation of all the King Arthur legends that existed before Malory. Malory tried to bring all the stories together into one cohesive whole. Morte d'Arthur is a trove of stories about magical encounters and various quests that is loosely centered on the rise and fall of King Arthur.

Over the years, there has been a lot of debate on whether books held more weight than movies. The Odyssey Online states that ever since the first book was adapted into a movie (Sherlock Holmes), there has been much debate on which was better—the movie, or the book. To most people, the book was better. There are many reasons why books are better than movies,

The acting of the characters is good but we are missing the chemistry between them. Even if the viewers didn’t know anything about British history, warfare, Christianity, or the Roman empire, the plot makes sense if we try to look beyond historical inaccuracy. The film is rated PG-13 owing to the battle scenes and a “almost” sex scene. For a action buff like me, the bloody and gory battle scenes made perfect sense. The close range combat scenes are realistic and the use of special effects during the battle is spectacular. I really enjoyed the fact that Fuqua curtailed the use of computer effects in the battle scenes. The action dominates the movie by far, and this in some ways creates gaps in the illustrating the depth of characters.In the final battle, we see the Saxon playing their drums and chanting. This was one of my favourite parts in the movie.