A is obliged to deliver a Rolex watch to B on December 1, 2009. Before December 1, 2009, A has to take care of the Seiko watch with the diligence of a good father of the family. In case of loss of the Seiko watch by negligence of A, A is liable in damages. A is not required to exercise the diligence of a good father of a family. The obligation of A to B is not valid.

A is obliged to deliver a Rolex watch to B on December 1, 2009. Before December 1, 2009, A has to take care of the Seiko watch with the diligence of a good father of the family. In case of loss of the Seiko watch by negligence of A, A is liable in damages. A is not required to exercise the diligence of a good father of a family. The obligation of A to B is not valid.

Administration Of Wills/Trusts/ And Estates

5th Edition

ISBN:9781285281308

Author:Brown

Publisher:Brown

Chapter8: Trusts

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1CTD

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Rowan promised to give his dog named "Max" to Alan to be delivered on February 14, 2022. Supposed on February 14, 2022, Rowan did not deliver Max to Alan and the latter also did not demand delivery of said dog. Is Rowan liable?
After agreeing to rent a car from Drive-Around Inc., Eden is given the keys to one of the agency’s cars by Fess, a Drive-Around employee. With respect to the bailed property, this is a. not a delivery. b. an involuntary delivery. c. a constructive delivery. d. a physical delivery.
Nadine visits Urban Air, a trampoline park. Before Nadine can enter the trampoline park, Urban Air requires her to sign a release stating that Urban Air will not be held responsible for any injury of any kind that Nadine incurs while on Urban Air property, no matter what the cause of the injury is. While Nadine is jumping on a trampoline, her boyfriend Trevor joins her. Trevor’s ex-girlfriend Valarie, who is an Urban Air employee, becomes enraged and pushes Nadine off the trampoline. Nadine breaks an arm in the incident. Who can Nadine sue for her injuries? a) Urban Air only b) Nadine cannot sue anyone because she signed a release of liability form. c) Valarie and Urban Air Select correct answer
During the year to 31 December 2019, a customer started legal proceedings against TCI Food company, claiming that one of the food products that it manufactures had caused several members of his family to become seriously ill. The company’s lawyers have advised that this action will probably not succeed. Should the company disclose this in its financial statements according to IAS 37?
Langstraat, age seventeen, owned a motorcycle that he insured against liability with Midwest Mutual Insurance Company. He signed a notice of rejection attached to the policy indicating that he did not desire to purchase uninsured motorists’ coverage from the insurance company. Later he was involved in an accident with another motorcycle owned and operated by a party who was uninsured. Langstraat now seeks to recover from the insurance company, asserting that his rejection was not a valid rejection because he is a minor. Can Langstraat recover from Midwest? Explain.
A contract is entered into between Jane, a minor and Sisa, an insane person. Jose, the father of Jane ratified the contract. What is the status of the contract after ratification? * Rescissible Unenforceable Null and void Voidable
Suresh is a technician working with Melissa’s car repair centre. Due to a dangerous workplace accident, Suresh became seriously ill. Suresh received compensation of $131,000. The lump sum was divided into $57,000 loss of earnings, $43,000 loss of future earning capacity and $31,000 for pain and suffering. Based on legal provisions and case law, advise Suresh, will any of these amounts be assessable income? Furthermore, advise Suresh whether it would be better to accept a lesser
A) Nathaniel was severely injured while at work, he lost a portion of right arm. Nathaniel received compensatory and punitive damages for his loss. He received $20,000 in compensatory damages for his medical expenses, $5,000,000 for lost income, $400,000 for pain and suffering, and $800,000 in punitive damages. How much of the damages should Nathaniel include in gross income? B) Tamara and Shane entered into a divorce decree on May 2, 2019. Shane is required to pay his former spouse $3,000 a month. Tamara has custody of their only child, Nicole. When Nicole turns 18 on August 31, 2019, the payments change to $2,500 per month. The remaining $2,500 is to be paid to Tamara as long as she lives or until she remarries. How much of the payments from Shane should be included in Tamara’s 2019 gross income.
Due to his debt to Chur, Schwyz wrote a promissory note which is payable to the order of Chur. Chur's sister, Sion, misrepresenting herself as agent of Chur, obtained the note from Schwyz. Sion then negotiated the note to Lausanne after forging the signature of Chur. May Lausanne enforce the note against Schwyz? a. Yes, since Schwyz is the principal debtor. b. No, since it is Chur who can enforce it, the note being payable to the order of Chur. c. No, since the signature of Chur was forged. d. Yes, since Schwyz, as maker, is primarily liable on the note.
Thompson’s house was destroyed by fire and claims were filed with the insurance company. The insurance company (insurer) hired Cannon to investigate the fire as it was suspicious about the cause. Subsequently, the insurer denied the claims based on Cannon’s report. Thompson sued the insurer and Cannon. Thompson claimed to be a third party beneficiary of the Cannon-insurer contract. Is Thompson correct? If not, what type of beneficiary is he and why?
Mrs. Y, wife of a deceased employee, received financial benefits voluntarily voted upon by the Board of Directors of the employer-company in recognition of her husband’s long and loyal service and primarily to help her meet financial needs. Which of the following is false? A. Mrs. Y is not subject to income tax on the financial benefits she received because there were no services rendered by Mrs. Y. B. Mrs. Y is subject to income tax on the financial benefits she received because such amount is in consideration of her deceased husband’s employment. C. The amount is not considered as income of the deceased employee because the giving was not in payment for services rendered. D. A and B
Which statement describes a technique used to address the issue of ensuring the payment of adequate child support by a noncustodial parent when the parents of minor children are divorced? A) A provision in the noncustodial parent's will leaving property to the minor will solve this concern. B) To ensure that child support payments are continued if the noncustodial parent dies or becomes disabled before such payments are to cease, the parents must enter into a nuptial agreement. C) An irrevocable trust established and funded by the noncustodial parent to ensure payment of child support can be a valuable tool to protect such assets from the claims of future creditors of the noncustodial parent. D) Insurance on the life of the noncustodial parent must be owned by an irrevocable life insurance trust to prevent the noncustodial parent from changing the beneficiary.