Robert is shopping in the local supermarket and is injured when he slips on the wet floor which has not been cleared up by the supermarket staff. Robert may sue for damages under: O contract law. O the tort of negligence. O the tort of nuisance. O consumer protection law.

Robert is shopping in the local supermarket and is injured when he slips on the wet floor which has not been cleared up by the supermarket staff. Robert may sue for damages under: O contract law. O the tort of negligence. O the tort of nuisance. O consumer protection law.

Contemporary Auditing

11th Edition

ISBN:9781337650380

Author:KNAPP

Publisher:KNAPP

Chapter4: Ethical Responsibilities Of Accountants

Section4.3: Suzette Washington, Accounting Major

Problem 2Q

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

27) Suzan’s office building was damaged by a fire caused by a careless tenant. After paying Suzan for her loss, the insurance company sued the tenant to recover its loss. This suit is based on the principle of
Nadine visits Urban Air, a trampoline park. Before Nadine can enter the trampoline park, Urban Air requires her to sign a release stating that Urban Air will not be held responsible for any injury of any kind that Nadine incurs while on Urban Air property, no matter what the cause of the injury is. While Nadine is jumping on a trampoline, her boyfriend Trevor joins her. Trevor’s ex-girlfriend Valarie, who is an Urban Air employee, becomes enraged and pushes Nadine off the trampoline. Nadine breaks an arm in the incident. Who can Nadine sue for her injuries? a) Urban Air only b) Nadine cannot sue anyone because she signed a release of liability form. c) Valarie and Urban Air Select correct answer
Martha Simms is the plaintiff in a contract suit she has brought against Floral Supply, Inc., for its failure to deliver the green sponge Martha needed in building the floral designs she sells to exclusive home decorators. Martha had to obtain the sponge from another supplier and was late on seven deliveries. One of Martha’s customers has been called by Martha’s lawyer as a witness and is now on the witness stand, testifying about Martha’s late performance and the penalty she charged. The lawyer for Floral Supply knows that Martha’s customer frequently waives penalties for good suppliers. 1. Question: How can Floral Supply’s lawyer get that information before the jury?
Murray reported to the Environmental Protection Agency that his employer was illegally dumping chemicals into a river. His charges were true, and Murray's employer was fined. In retaliation, Murray's employer fired him and made deliberate efforts to prevent Murray from obtaining other employment. Murray sued the employer, claiming that his reputation had been damaged. Murray won his lawsuit and received an award for "damages to his personal and professional reputa- tion and for his mental suffering." Now he would like to know whether the award is taxable. He argues that he was awarded damages as a recovery of his human capital and that a recovery of capital is not income. Is Murray's logic comrect?
Thompson’s house was destroyed by fire and claims were filed with the insurance company. The insurance company (insurer) hired Cannon to investigate the fire as it was suspicious about the cause. Subsequently, the insurer denied the claims based on Cannon’s report. Thompson sued the insurer and Cannon. Thompson claimed to be a third party beneficiary of the Cannon-insurer contract. Is Thompson correct? If not, what type of beneficiary is he and why?
Hunn injured herself when she slipped and fell on a loose plank while walking down some steps. The night before, while entering the hotel, she had noticed that the steps were dangerous, and although she knew from her earlier stays at the hotel that another exit was available, she chose that morning to leave via the dangerous steps. The hotel was aware of the hazard, as one of the other guests who had fallen that night had reported his accident to the desk clerk then on duty. Still, the hotel did not place cautionary signs on the steps to warn of the danger, and they were not roped off or otherwise excluded from use. Hunn brought an action against the hotel for injuries she sustained as a result of her fall. Should she recover? Explain.
The negligence of Aivee, driver of a certain bus company, resulted in the death of JP's wife, physical injuries to JP that prevented him from working for a month, and the total wreck of JP's brand new car which he had bought for P400.000. In the action for damages filed by JP against the bus company, the court awarded the following: • P30,000 for JP's injuries consisting mainly in the loss of his right hand; • P45,000 for JP's loss of one month salary: • P25,000 for the death of his wife: • P100,000 moral damages on account of the death of JP's wife; and • P800,000 for the loss of JP's car. How much is excluded from gross income? a Zero b. P155,000 c. P555,000 d. P955,000
Hammer regularly took his car to be serviced at his local garage, Vanilla Ice Limited. On several occasions before handing his car over to the garage, VanillaIce always required Hammer to read and sign a contractual document which contained the following statement in big bold red type;“Vanilla Ice Ltd accepts no responsibility for any consequential loss or injury sustained as a result of any work carried out by the company, whether as a result of negligence or otherwise.” On the most recent visit to the garage, Vanilla Ice was very busy when Hammer arrived and because of thatfact Hammer was not asked to sign the usual document. He was however, given a receipt for his car, which he accepted without reading. Vanilla Ice’s usual business terms were printed on the back of the receipt in red, including the saidcontractual term stated above. On his way home after servicing, Hammer was severely injured when the car suddenly burst into flames. It subsequently emerged that the fire had been…
Marley goes outside the duties of her agency in negotiating a business contract between her principal and a customer. Which of the following is true? A. Even if the principal ratifies the contract Marley made, it does not have to pay her for the work. B. If the principal disavows the contract Marley made, it still must pay for the work. C. If the principal ratifies the contract Marley made, it must pay her for the work. D. The principal is required to ratify the contract Marley made, and also to pay her for her work.
An accident solely attributable to the criminal negligence of the driver of Reckless Bus Company resulted in the death of Ricardo's wife, physical injury to Ricardo that prevented him from working for a month and the total wreck of his brand new car which he bought for P400,000. In the action for damages filed by Ricardo against the Bus Company, the Court awarded the following: For Ricardo's injury consisting mainly in the loss of his right arm P30,000 For the loss of one month salary 25,000 For the death of his wife 25,000 For moral damages on account of such loss 100,000 For the loss of his car the value of which doubled because of inflation 800,000 1. How much was the taxable income of Ricardo?"
Varney operated one of two 5-ton cranes in a factory. Both cranes were to act simultaneously in lifting a 9- ton machine. The other operator was busy elsewhere, so Varney, who was in a hurry, tried to lift the machine with his crane alone. The cable broke after the load was 10 feet above the floor, and a worker who happened to be walking under the crane but who had nothing to do with the operation was injured. Has the worker a valid cause of action against Varney?
A customer has filed a suit against a trader who has supplied poor quality goods to him. It is known that the court judgment will be in favour of the customer and the trader will be required to pay the damages. However, the amount of legal damages is not known with certainity. The accounting year has already been ended and the books are now finalised to ascertain true profit or loss. The accountant of the trader has advised him not to consider the expected loss on account of payment of legal damages because the amount is not certain and the final judgment of the court is not yet out. Do you think the accountant is right in his approach.