Anna is risk averse and has a utility function of the form u(w) pocket she has €9 and a lottery ticket worth €40 with a probability of 50% and nothing otherwise. She can sell this lottery ticket to Ben who is risk neutral and has €30 in his pocket. Find the range of prices that would make such a transaction possible

Anna is risk averse and has a utility function of the form u(w) pocket she has €9 and a lottery ticket worth €40 with a probability of 50% and nothing otherwise. She can sell this lottery ticket to Ben who is risk neutral and has €30 in his pocket. Find the range of prices that would make such a transaction possible

Managerial Economics: A Problem Solving Approach

5th Edition

ISBN:9781337106665

Author:Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike Shor

Publisher:Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike Shor

Chapter18: Auctions

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 18.1IP

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Gary likes to gamble. Donna offers to bet him $31 on the outcome of a boat race. If Gary’s boat wins, Donna would give him $31. If Gary’s boat does not win, Gary would give her $31. Gary’s utility function is p1x^21+p2x^22, where p1 and p2 are the probabilities of events 1 and 2 and where x1 and x2 are his wealth if events 1 and 2 occur respectively. Gary’s total wealth is currently only $80 and he believes that the probability that he will win the race is 0.3. Which of the following is correct? (please submit the number corresponding to the correct answer). Taking the bet would reduce his expected utility. Taking the bet would leave his expected utility unchanged. Taking the bet would increase his expected utility. There is not enough information to determine whether taking the bet would increase or decrease his expected utility. The information given in the problem is self-contradictory.
. Priyanka has an income of £90,000 and is a von Neumann-Morgenstern expected utility maximiser with von Neumann-Morgenstern utility index . There is a 1 % probability that there is flooding damage at her house. The repair of the damage would cost £80,000 which would reduce the income to £10,000. a) Would Priyanka be willing to spend £500 to purchase an insurance policy that would fully insure her against this loss? Explain.
. Priyanka has an income of £90,000 and is a von Neumann-Morgenstern expected utility maximiser with von Neumann-Morgenstern utility index u(x) √x . There is a 1 % probability that there is flooding damage at her house. The repair of the damage would cost £80,000 which would reduce the income to £10,000. a) Would Priyanka be willing to spend £500 to purchase an insurance policy that would fully insure her against this loss? Explain.
Please draw a utility function that exhibits risk-loving behavior for small gambles (low values)and risk-averse behavior for larger gambles (high value).
Consider an individual who maximizes his expected utility with the following utility function: U(x) = logX He is faced with the lottery with the following probabilities and payoffs Probability Money 0.4 30 0.5 100 0.1 50 a. Find his expected utility b. Calculate the Certainty Equivalent c. Find the amount that the individual will be willing to pay in order to avoid the lottery (That is, the risk premium)
An agent makes decisions using U(ct) = (ct−χct−1)1−γ 1−γ . Answer the following: (a) Suppose χ = 0. Derive an expression for the coefficient of relative risk aversion RR(ct)? (b) Suppose 0 < χ ≤ 1. Derive an expression for the coefficient of relative risk aversion RR(ct)?
Calculate the risk premium of John when he faces the risky prospect X = {1, 4, 9, 16; 0.2, 0.4, 0.4, 0.0} . His utility function is u ( x ) = x , where x is wealth. (Use two decimals)
Consider a risk averse individual who has utility function u(a) which is increasing with u(0) = 0. There are two risky assets: A,B. For A, every dollar invested gives return $0 with probability 1/3 and $3 with probability 2/3. For B, every dollar invested gives return is $0 with probability 1/4 and $3 with probability 3/4. The individual has $120 to invest. Consider two investment choices: (1) invest entire $120 in A and (2) invest $60 in A, $60 in B. (a) Drawing diagram of the utility function and showing your work, determine the expected utility of the individual from choice 1. (b)Drawing diagram of the utility function and showing your work, determine the expected utility of the individual from choice 2 when return from A is bad. (c) Drawing diagram of the utility function and showing your work, determine the expected utility of the individual from choice 2 when return from A is good. (d) Drawing diagram of the utility function and showing your work, determine the…
Priyanka has an income of £90,000 and is a von Neumann-Morgenstern expected utility maximiser with von Neumann-Morgenstern utility index u(x) = square root x . There is a 1 % probability that there is flooding damage at her house. The repair of the damage would cost £80,000 which would reduce the income to £10,000. a) Would Priyanka be willing to spend £500 to purchase an insurance policy that would fully insure her against this loss? Explain
Max Pentridge is thinking of starting a pinball palace near a large Melbourne university. His utility is given by u(W) = 1 - (5,000/W), where W is his wealth. Max's total wealth is $10,000. With probability p = 0.9 the palace will succeed and Max's wealth will grow from $10,000 to $x. With probability 1 - p the palace will be a failure and he’ll lose $5,000, so that his wealth will be just $5,000. What is the smallest value of x that would be sufficient to make Max want to invest in the pinball palace rather than have a wealth of $10,000 with certainty? ____ (Please round your final answer to the whole dollar, if necessary)
As risk aversion increases, which direction does the certainty equivalent wealth move, holding the bet fixed?
Arielle is a risk-averse traveler who is planning a trip to Canada. She is planning on carrying $400 in her backpack. Walking the streets of Canada, however, can be dangerous and there is some chance that she will have her backpack stolen. If she is only carrying cash and her backpack is stolen, she will have no money ($0). The probability that her backpack is stolen is 1/5. Finally assume that her preferences over money can be represented by the utility function U(x)=(x)^0.5 Suppose that she has the option to buy traveler’s checks. If her backpack is stolen and she is carrying traveler’s checks then she can have those checks replaced at no cost. National Express charges a fee of $p per $1 traveler’s check. In other words, the price of a $1 traveler’s check is $(1+p). If the purchase of traveler’s checks is a fair bet, then we know that the purchase of traveler checks will not change her expected income. Show that if the purchase is a fair bet, then the price (1+p) = $1.25.