Answer the question based on the following payoff matnx for a duopoly in which the numbers indicate the profit from following ether an international strategy or a national strategy Firm A's Strategies International National A= $3M A= $5M B= $3M B= $15M A= $15M A = $17M B= $5M B= $17M Refer to the above table. When this game reaches a Nash equilibrium, the payoffs will be Muiple Choice O S3M for both fems S17M for both fiems $15 for fem A and $5 for fem B Firm B's Strategies National International

Answer the question based on the following payoff matnx for a duopoly in which the numbers indicate the profit from following ether an international strategy or a national strategy Firm A's Strategies International National A= $3M A= $5M B= $3M B= $15M A= $15M A = $17M B= $5M B= $17M Refer to the above table. When this game reaches a Nash equilibrium, the payoffs will be Muiple Choice O S3M for both fems S17M for both fiems $15 for fem A and $5 for fem B Firm B's Strategies National International

Microeconomic Theory

12th Edition

ISBN:9781337517942

Author:NICHOLSON

Publisher:NICHOLSON

Chapter8: Game Theory

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 8.1P

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Sometimes oligopolies in the same industry are very different in size. Suppose we have a duopoly where one firm (Film A) is large and the other film (Film B) is small, as the prisoners dilemma box in Table 10.4 shows. Assuming that both films know the payoffs, what is the likely outcome in this case?
Does each individual in a prisoners dilemma benefit more from cooperation or from pursuing self-interest? Explain briefly.
Consider the following game: Player 2 In Out Player 1 In -2,-2 2, 0 Out 0, 2 0, 0 (a) What is the Nash equilibrium of this game, or what are the Nash equilibriaof this game? (b) Does either firm have a dominate strategy (a strategy that is always abest response)? Which? (c) Suppose Player 1 could move before Player 2 and Player 2 could observe Player 1’s move. What do you think would happen?
Solve for the Nash equilibrium (or equilibria) in each of the following games. (a) The following two-by-two game is a little harder to solve since firm 2’spreferred strategy depends of what firm 1 does. But firm 1 has a dominantstrategy so this game has one Nash equilibrium. Firm 2 Launch Don’tFirm 1 Launch 60, -10 100, 0 Don’t 80, 30 120, 0 What is the Nash equilibrium of this simultaneous-move game? (b) What would the outcome of this game be if instead firm 1 moved first and then, after seeing what firm 1 chose, firm 2 chose it strategy? In this case firm 1 doesn’t necessarily need to choose a best response, but firm 2 must choose a best response since it moves second.
Suppose O2 and Vodafone are the only two telecommunicationscompanies in UK. Both companies are considering whether ornot to stop offering unlimited data plans. Each company has twostrategies: stop or don’t stop. The first entry in the brackets is the payoffsof O2 and the second entry is the payoffs of Vodafone, both in $million.What will be the dominant strategies of O2 and Vodafone and what willbe the Nash equilibrium? Explain your answers.
The following payoff matrix shows the possible sentence that two suspects , who are arrested on suspicion on car threft,could recieve. The suspects are intarogated seperately and are unable to communicate with one another. For the information given in the payoff matrix above: a. Is there a dominant strategy. b. What is the dominant strategy? How do you know? c. Is there a Nash equilibirium ? How do you know?
Refer to the payoff matrix below. Assuming this is a sequential game with no collusion, what is the outcome if Firm A moves first to build a new type of commercial aircraft? Explain why fifi rst-mover strategies in the realworld are only as good as the profifit projections on which they are based. How could a supposed “win” from moving first turn out to be a big loss, whereas the “loss” of being preempted turn out to be a blessing in disguise?
Consider this market that is dominated by two airlines, American and United. Each can choose to charge a high price (and restrict capacity) or charge a low price (and expand capacity). If one of the airlines reduces the price and the other does not, then the airline that reduced the price can capture customers from the other airline. The profits for each outcome is shown below: a. Does United have a dominant strategy? If so, what is it? Explain. b. What is the Nash equilibrium in this game? Explain. c. Is this game an example of a Prisoner’s Dilemma? Explain.
Consider this market that is dominated by two airlines, American and United. Each can choose to charge a high price (and restrict capacity) or charge a low price (and expand capacity). If one of the airlines reduces the price and the other does not, then the airline that reduced the price can capture customers from the other airline. The profits for each outcome is shown below: a.Does United have a dominant strategy? If so, what is it? Explain. b. What is the Nash equilibrium in this game? Explain. c. Is this game an example of a Prisoner’s Dilemma? Explain.