
For the rest of this question consider a two goods economy where Kim and Jung
can trade Ferraris (good x) and VR headsets (good y) with each other. Kim and
Jung both enjoy driving Ferraris and having more VR headsets (so more friends
can play the same game).
They start at the same (high) level of income. Kim has an initial endowment of (x0k, y0k) = (10,30) and Jung has an initial endowment of (x0j, y0j) = (30,10)
d) Assume that a social planner could redistribute initial wealth (the amounts of ?
and ? that Kim and Jung have). Can they reallocate resources so that Kim and
Jung reach the allocation (Xk, Yk) = (20,20) and (Xj, Yj) = (20,20) as a general
equilibrium (i.e. post-trade) allocation? Can the social planner redistribute resources to make the allocation where Jung owns all the resources in the economy a general equilibrium allocation?

Step by stepSolved in 2 steps

- QUESTION 1 Alice (A) and Bob (B) have an endowment of goods 1 and 2, with Alice's endowment being (wt, w) = (1,2) and Bob's endowment equals (wf , w) = (1,3). Alice's utility is given by u4 (xf, xf) = 2 ln xf + In æ£ , while Bob's utility is uB(xf, x}) = ln xf + 2 ln x? . Suppose that the social planner considers it to be imperative that agent B consumes exactly one uni of good 1 and four units of good 2. Although the social planner can not force the individuals to a particular consumption, they can enforce transfers of good 1 between the consumers (transfers of good 2 are not enforceable by the social planner). What transfer of good 1 would guarantee that in the resulting competitive Walrasian equilibrium consumer B consumes one unit of good 1 and four units of good 2? Answer this please Select one: O a. One half unit of good 1 has to be transferred from agent A to agent B. O b. There is no endowment for which agent B would consume x = 1 and x = 4 in the corresponding competitive…arrow_forward3. Christina loves pizza and hates burger. Her utility function is U(p – b) = p – 6", where is the number of pizzas she consumes and b is the number of burgers she consumes. John likes both pizza and burger. His utility function is U(p, b) = p + 2\b Christina has an initial endowment of no pizzas and 8 burgers. John has an initial endowment of 16 pizzas and 8 burgers. a. Graph the initial endowment and label it E b. If Christina hates burgers and John likes them, how many burgers can Christina and John be consuming at a Pareto optimal allocation? What is John's marginal utility for pizzas and burgers? Mark the locus of Pareto optimal allocations of pizzas and burgers between Christina and John on the grapsh above.arrow_forwardSuppose that consumer I has the utility function u(x,y) = x + 2y and consumer II has the utility function u(x,y) = min{x, 2y}. Consumer I initially has 12 units of y and zero units of x, while consumer II has 12 units of x and zero units of y. It is correct to state that, in competitive equilibrium, the agents' consumption basket will be:arrow_forward
- Two friends are deciding where to go for dinner. There are three choices, which we label A, B, and C. Max prefers A to B to C. Sally prefers B to A to C. To decide which restaurant to go to, the friends adopt the following procedure: First, Max eliminates one of three choices. Then, Sally decides among the two remaining choices. Thus, Max has three strategies (eliminate A, eliminate B, and eliminate C). For each of those strategies, Sally has two choices (choose among the two remaining). a.Write down the extensive form (game tree) to represent this game. b.If Max acts non-strategically, and makes a decision in the first period to eliminate his least desirable choice, what will the final decision be? c.What is the subgame-perfect equilibrium of the above game? d. Does your answer in b. differ from your answer in c.? Explain why or why not. Only typed Answerarrow_forwardConsider the following game - one card is dealt to player 1 ( the sender) from a standard deck of playing cards. The card may either be red (heart or diamond) or black (spades or clubs). Player 1 observes her card, but player 2 (the receiver) does not - Player 1 decides to Play (P) or Not Play (N). If player 1 chooses not to play, then the game ends and the player receives -1 and player 2 receives 1. - If player 1 chooses to play, then player 2 observes this decision (but not the card) and chooses to Continue (C) or Quit (Q). If player 2 chooses Q, player 1 earns a payoff of 1 and player 2 a payoff of -1 regardless of player 1's card - If player 2 chooses continue, player 1 reveals her card. If the card is red, player 1 receives a payoff of 3 and player 2 a payoff of -3. If the card is black, player 1 receives a payoff of 2 and player 2 a payoff of -1 a. Draw the extensive form game b. Draw the Bayesian form gamearrow_forwardTwo roommates John and Joe are playing a simultaneous game of cleaning the apartment. If neither of them clean, the apartment gets filthy and both get a utility of 2. If John cleans and Joe doesn't, John gets a utility of 1 and Joe gets a utility of 4. If Joe cleans and John doesn't, Joe gets a utility of 1 and John gets a utility of 4 and if both clean up the apartment, they each get a utility of 3. Is the equilibrium efficient?arrow_forward
- Van has plans to go to an opera and already has a $100 nonrefundable, nonexchangeable, and nontransferable ticket. Now Amy, whom Van has wanted to date for a long time, asks him to a party. Van would prefer to go to the party with Amy and forgo the opera, but he doesn't want to waste the $100 he spent on the opera ticket. From the perspective of an economist, if Van decides to go to the party with Amy, what has he just done? 1. Incorrectly allowed a sunk cost to influence his decision 2. Made a choice that was not optimal 3 Correctly ignored a sunk cost Note:- Do not provide handwritten solution. Maintain accuracy and quality in your answer. Take care of plagiarism. Answer completely. You will get up vote for sure.arrow_forwardSuppose there are two consumers, A and B, and two goods, X and Y. Consumer A is given an initial endowment of 3 units of good X and 5 units of good Y. Consumer B is given an initial endowment of 5 units of good X and 3 units of good Y. Consumer A's utility function is given by: UA(X,Y)= X + 4Y, and consumer B's utility function is given by UB(X,Y)= MIN (X, 2Y). If the prices are Px = 1 and Py = 3, if each consumer sells her initial endowment and buys back her optimal bundle, which of the following statements is true? Group of answer choices Both Markets are in Equilibrium There is Excess Demand in the Market for Good X = 2.4 There is Excess Demand in the Market for Good Y = 0.8 There is Excess Supply in the Market for Good Y = 1.6 There is Excess Supply in the Market for Good X = 1.6 Earrow_forwardJohn and Belle consume only two goods, x and y. They have strictly convex preferences and no kinks in their indifference curves. At the initial endowment point, the ratio of John's marginal utility of x to his marginal utility of y is J and the ratio of Belle's marginal utility of x to her marginal utility of y is B, where J B. b. C < J. c. C = J. d. C = B. e. Jarrow_forwardarrow_back_iosarrow_forward_ios
- Principles of Economics (12th Edition)EconomicsISBN:9780134078779Author:Karl E. Case, Ray C. Fair, Sharon E. OsterPublisher:PEARSONEngineering Economy (17th Edition)EconomicsISBN:9780134870069Author:William G. Sullivan, Elin M. Wicks, C. Patrick KoellingPublisher:PEARSON
- Principles of Economics (MindTap Course List)EconomicsISBN:9781305585126Author:N. Gregory MankiwPublisher:Cengage LearningManagerial Economics: A Problem Solving ApproachEconomicsISBN:9781337106665Author:Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike ShorPublisher:Cengage LearningManagerial Economics & Business Strategy (Mcgraw-...EconomicsISBN:9781259290619Author:Michael Baye, Jeff PrincePublisher:McGraw-Hill Education





