Consider a linear regression model that relates school expenditures and family background to student performance in Massachusetts using 224 school districts. The response variable is the mean score on the MCAS (Massachusetts Comprehensive Assessment System) exam given in May 1998 to 10th-graders. Four explanatory variables are used: (1) STR is the student-to-teacher ratio, (2) TSAL is the average teacher’s salary, (3) INC is the median household income, and (4) SGL is the percentage of single family households. The Excel Regression output for the sample regression equation is given below. (a) What proportion of the variation in MCAS score is explained by the explanatory variables?    (b) At the 5% level, are the explanatory variables jointly significant in explaining MCAS score? Explain briefly.     (c) At the 5% level, which variables are individually significant at predicting MCAS score? Explain briefly.       (d) Suppose a second regression model (Model 2) was generated using only the variables STR, INC, and SGL. For that model Which model is better, Model 2 or Model 1, the model given above in the table with explanatory variables STR, INC, TSAL, SGL? Explain briefly.

Algebra & Trigonometry with Analytic Geometry
13th Edition
ISBN:9781133382119
Author:Swokowski
Publisher:Swokowski
Chapter5: Inverse, Exponential, And Logarithmic Functions
Section5.6: Exponential And Logarithmic Equations
Problem 68E
icon
Related questions
icon
Concept explainers
Question

 

Consider a linear regression model that relates school expenditures and family background to student performance in Massachusetts using 224 school districts. The response variable is the mean score on the MCAS (Massachusetts Comprehensive Assessment System) exam given in May 1998 to 10th-graders. Four explanatory variables are used: (1) STR is the student-to-teacher ratio, (2) TSAL is the average teacher’s salary, (3) INC is the median household income, and (4) SGL is the percentage of single family households. The Excel Regression output for the sample regression equation is given below.





(a) What proportion of the variation in MCAS score is explained by the explanatory variables? 

 

(b) At the 5% level, are the explanatory variables jointly significant in explaining MCAS score? Explain briefly. 

 

 (c) At the 5% level, which variables are individually significant at predicting MCAS score? Explain briefly. 

 

 

 (d) Suppose a second regression model (Model 2) was generated using only the variables STR, INC, and SGL. For that model



Which model is better, Model 2 or Model 1, the model given above in the table with explanatory variables STR, INC, TSAL, SGL? Explain briefly. 

Regression Statistics
ANOVA
Multiple R
R Square
0.79
df
MS
F
Significance F
0.62
Regression
4
6548.49
1637.12 88.367068 1.384E-44
Adjusted R
0.61
Residual
219
4057.28
18.53
Standard Er
4.30
Total
223
10605.77
Observation
224.00
Coefficients itandard Erro
t Stat
P-value
Lower 95% Upper 95% Lower 95.0%Jpper 95.0%
Intercept
231.89
3.370
68.82 2.57E-150
225.253
238.535 225.25349 238.53537
STR
-0.50
0.131
-3.79 0.0001915
-0.754
-0.238 -0.7538457 -0.2384408
TSAL
-0.02
0.075
-0.31 0.7546528
-0.170
0.124
-0.17037 0.1236846
INC
0.29
0.034
8.51 2.776E-15
0.225
0.361 0.2250472 0.3607169
SGL
-0.88
0.174
-5.06 9.052E-07
-1.220
-0.536 -1.2202964 -0.535734
Transcribed Image Text:Regression Statistics ANOVA Multiple R R Square 0.79 df MS F Significance F 0.62 Regression 4 6548.49 1637.12 88.367068 1.384E-44 Adjusted R 0.61 Residual 219 4057.28 18.53 Standard Er 4.30 Total 223 10605.77 Observation 224.00 Coefficients itandard Erro t Stat P-value Lower 95% Upper 95% Lower 95.0%Jpper 95.0% Intercept 231.89 3.370 68.82 2.57E-150 225.253 238.535 225.25349 238.53537 STR -0.50 0.131 -3.79 0.0001915 -0.754 -0.238 -0.7538457 -0.2384408 TSAL -0.02 0.075 -0.31 0.7546528 -0.170 0.124 -0.17037 0.1236846 INC 0.29 0.034 8.51 2.776E-15 0.225 0.361 0.2250472 0.3607169 SGL -0.88 0.174 -5.06 9.052E-07 -1.220 -0.536 -1.2202964 -0.535734
(d) Suppose a second regression model (Model 2) was generated using only the variables STR, INC, and SGL. For
that model
R2 = 0.70, sę = 3.68 , Adjusted R2 = 0.67.
Transcribed Image Text:(d) Suppose a second regression model (Model 2) was generated using only the variables STR, INC, and SGL. For that model R2 = 0.70, sę = 3.68 , Adjusted R2 = 0.67.
Expert Solution
trending now

Trending now

This is a popular solution!

steps

Step by step

Solved in 2 steps

Blurred answer
Knowledge Booster
Correlation, Regression, and Association
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, statistics and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.
Similar questions
  • SEE MORE QUESTIONS
Recommended textbooks for you
Algebra & Trigonometry with Analytic Geometry
Algebra & Trigonometry with Analytic Geometry
Algebra
ISBN:
9781133382119
Author:
Swokowski
Publisher:
Cengage
Functions and Change: A Modeling Approach to Coll…
Functions and Change: A Modeling Approach to Coll…
Algebra
ISBN:
9781337111348
Author:
Bruce Crauder, Benny Evans, Alan Noell
Publisher:
Cengage Learning