Consider an all-pay, sealed-bid auction where the item goes to the highest bidder and all of the buyers pay what they bid. Assume that buyer valuations follow a uniform(0,1) distribution. Use the revenue equivalence theorem to find the symmetric equilibrium bidding strategy b(v). Show the bidding function b(v) and your work in deriving it.

Consider an all-pay, sealed-bid auction where the item goes to the highest bidder and all of the buyers pay what they bid. Assume that buyer valuations follow a uniform(0,1) distribution. Use the revenue equivalence theorem to find the symmetric equilibrium bidding strategy b(v). Show the bidding function b(v) and your work in deriving it.

Managerial Economics: A Problem Solving Approach

5th Edition

ISBN:9781337106665

Author:Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike Shor

Publisher:Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike Shor

Chapter18: Auctions

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 5MC

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Q2.1 In the second round with two buyers remaining, the probability that a buyer with valuation v wins is vN-1, where N is the number of buyers in the first round. Use the revenue equivalence theorem to derive the symmetric equilibrium bidding function b(v) for the buyers in stage two. Show your work. Q2.2 At the end of the auction what is the value of the actual (not expected) revenue that the seller receives? Round your answer to at least three decimal spaces.
Consider a sealed-bid auction in which the seller draws one of the N bids at random. The buyer whose bid was drawn wins the auction and pays the amount bid. Assume that buyer valuations follow a uniform(0,1) distribution. 1. What is the symmetric equilibrium bidding strategy b(v)?2. What is the seller’s expected revenue?3. Why doesn’t this auction pay the seller the same revenue as the four standard auctions? That is, why doesn’t the revenue equivalence theorem apply here?
Is the following statement true? "5 bidders with private values uniformly distributed between 0 and 1 enter a 1st price auction. Assuming that everyone is playing the symmetric equilibrium bidding strategy, the optimal bid for a bidder who makes a draw of 0.75 is 0.7."
You are a bidder in an independent private values auction, and you value the object at $4,500. Each bidder perceives that valuations are uniformly distributed between $1,000 and $10,000. Determine your optimal bidding strategy in a first-price, sealed-bid auction when the total number of bidders (including you) is: a. 2 bidders.Bid: $ b. 10 bidders.Bid: $ c. 100 bidders.Bid: $
Consider a Common Value auction with two bidders who both receive a signal X that is uniformly distributed between 0 and 1. The (common) value V of the good the players are bidding for is the average of the two signals, i.e. V = (X1+X2)/2. Compute the symmetric Nash equilibrium bidding strategy for the second-price sealed-bid auction assuming that players are risk-neutral and have standard selfish preferences. Furthermore, you may assume that the other bidder is following a linear bidding strategy. Make sure to explain your notation and the steps you take to derive the result.
Suppose there are N bidders competing for a single object in an all-pay auction. Each bidder has an i.i.d value vi for the object drawn from some continuous distribution F with support [0, M ]. (a) Show that there is a symmetric equilibrium in increasing strategies. (b) What is the expected revenue generated by this auction in the equilibrium from (a)? Elaborate the explanation on both the answers.
Two firms bid for a contract to build a university building. Their construction costs are independent and uniformly drawn from [0, 1]. Both bidders submit their bids si- multaneously. The winner is the bidder who submits a lowest bid. Tie-breaking rule is random. This kind of bidding game is called "reverse auction" because the bidders bid for the right to provide a service and the winner is paid for the service. The FCC in 2017 has adopted similar auctions designed to repurpose spectrum for new uses. (a) In the first auction, the winner gets paid the loser's bid. For example, if the winner's cost is 0.5, his bid is 0.56, and the loser's bid is 0.6, then the winner gets the contract and the university pays the winner 0.6. The winner's net profit from the contract is 0.6-0.5 = 0.1. Solve for a Bayesian Nash equilibrium of this auction. What is the equilibrium bid of a firm bid if his cost is actually 0.5? (b) In the second auction, the winner gets paid the his/her own winning bid. For…
Consider a Common Value auction with two bidders who both receive a signal X that is uniformly distributed between 0 and 1. The (common) value V of the good the players are bidding for is the average of the two signals, i.e. V = (X1+X2)/2. the symmetric Nash equilibrium bidding strategy for the second-price sealed-bid auction assuming that players are risk-neutral and have standard selfish preferences. Furthermore, you may assume that the other bidder is following a linear bidding strategy. Make sure to explain your notation and the steps you take to derive the result.
Two firms bid for a contract to build a university building. Their construction costs are independent and uniformly drawn from [0,1]: Both bidders submit their bids si- multaneously. The winner is the bidder who submits a lowest bid. Tie-breaking rule is random. This kind of bidding game is called i'reverse auction' because the bidders bid for the right to provide a service and the winner is paid for the service. The FCC in 2017 has adopted similar auctions designed to repurpose spectrum for new uses. (a) In the first auction, the winner gets paid the loser's bid. For example, if the winner's cost is 0.5, his bid is 0.56, and the loserís bid is 0.6, then the winner gets the contract and the university pays the winner 0.6. The winner's net profit from the contract is 0.6-0.5 = 0.1. Solve for a Bayesian Nash equilibrium of this auction. What is the equilibrium bid of a firm bid if his cost is actually 0.5? (b) In the second auction, the winner gets paid the his/her own winning…
How to solve this question? Consider an antique auction where bidders have independent private values. There are two bidders, each of whom perceives that valuations are uniformly distributed between $100 and $1,000. One of the bidders is Sue, who knows her own valuation is $200. What is Sue's optimal bidding strategy in a Dutch auction?
You are one of five risk-neutral bidders participating in an independent private values auction. Each bidder perceives that all other bidders’ valuations for the item are evenly distributed between $10,000 and $30,000. For each of the following auction types, determine your optimal bidding strategy if you value the item at $22,000. a. First-price, sealed-bid auction. b. Dutch auction. c. Second-price, sealed-bid auction. d. English auction.
You are a bidder in an independent private values auction, and you value the object at $4,000. Each bidder perceives that valuations are uniformly distributed between $1,500 and $9,000. Determine your optimal bidding strategy in a first-price, sealed-bid auction when the total number of bidders (including you) is: a. 2. b. 10. c. 100