i need the answer quickly Consider the following game in the normal formR.M0,00,440,3144,014,14|-1,16N31,016,-11,1a) Find the sets B and R1b) Are the strategy profiles in the set of rationalizable strategies of this game (i.e. the set R, x R2 ) Paretoefficient? Justify your answer.

Answer - Given in the question- A Answer - Need to find- Sets B1 and R1 B1 = 0,0 and R1 = [(0,0),…

Consider the following game in the normal form R. 0,0 0,44 0,31 M 44,0 14,14 -1,16 31,0 16,-1 1,1 a) Find the sets B andRI b) Are the strategy profiles in the set of rationalizable strategies of this game (i.e. the set R, x R2 ) Pareto efficient? Justify your answer.

Consider the following game in the normal form R. 0,0 0,44 0,31 M 44,0 14,14 -1,16 31,0 16,-1 1,1 a) Find the sets B andRI b) Are the strategy profiles in the set of rationalizable strategies of this game (i.e. the set R, x R2 ) Pareto efficient? Justify your answer.

Managerial Economics: Applications, Strategies and Tactics (MindTap Course List)

14th Edition

ISBN:9781305506381

Author:James R. McGuigan, R. Charles Moyer, Frederick H.deB. Harris

Publisher:James R. McGuigan, R. Charles Moyer, Frederick H.deB. Harris

Chapter13: best-practice Tactics: Game Theory

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 2E

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Which of the following statements about a Nash equilibrium is not correct? A. Each player plays a best response to opponents' Nash strategies. B. No player has a profitable unilateral deviation. C. For each finite noncoopertiave game there always exists a pure strategy Nash equilibrium. D. A game has at least two players. Which one of the following statements is incorrect? A. For dynamic games with complete information, not all subgame perfect Nash equilibrium points can be found by backward induction. B. A finite dynamic game with complete information may also have a normal form representation. C. A finite static game with complete information may not have a pure strategy Nash equilibrium. D. A finite static game with complete information cannot have an extensive form representation. Which one of the following statements is correct? A. A supergame cannot have any subgame perfect Nash equilibrium. B. A supergame can only have finite number of subgame perfect Nash…
Two firms are competing to establish one of two new wireless communication standards, A or B. A strategy is a choice of standard, and an outcome of this game is a choice of standard by each firm – for example, (A, B) represents the case where Firm 1 decides to develop standard A and Firm 2 develops standard B. Here, the first letter will always correspond to Firm 1’s decision, and the second letter to Firm 2’s decision. Firm 1 has the following preferences over outcomes, in order of highest to lowest preferred: it prefers (A, A) to (B, A) to (A, B) to (B, B). Firm 2 prefers (A, B) to (A, A) to (B, A) to (B, B). Suppose that firms simultaneously decide which standard to develop. What is the pure strategy Nash equilibrium?
Two firms are competing to establish one of two new wireless communication standards, A or B. A strategy is a choice of standard, and an outcome of this game is a choice of standard by each firm – for example, (A, B) represents the case where Firm 1 decides to develop standard A and Firm 2 develops standard B. Here, the first letter will always correspond to Firm 1’s decision, and the second letter to Firm 2’s decision. Firm 1 has the following preferences over outcomes, in order of highest to lowest preferred: it prefers (A, A) to (B, A) to (A, B) to (B, B). Firm 2 prefers (A, B) to (A, A) to (B, A) to (B, B). Suppose that firms simultaneously decide which standard to develop. What is the pure strategy Nash equilibrium? Is the answer (B,B)? If not please explian what is the answer?
This activity has 4 theorical and practical exercises for which you will have to describe the representation of each proposed game and its solutions.1. Consider the following game in strategic or normal form.A2 B2 C2A1 1,0 1,2 -2,1B1 6,2 0,3 2,3C1 2,2 -2,1 2,3▸ Use the iterative elimination of strictly dominated strategies to reduce the game as much as possible.▸ What is the set of rationalizable strategies for each player? Microeconomics (code ECO2023)Actividades 2© MIU City University Miami ▸ What is/are Nash equilibrium(s) in this game?▸ Explain the differences between cooperative and non- cooperative games. What are the fundamental hypotheses about the behavior of the persons in Game theory?2. Two hunters may choose, individually and simultaneously, to go deer hunting, as the deer can provide abundant and appetizing food, or to go hare hunting, also appetizing, but scarce. Deer hunting represents a challenge and requires mutual coordination. Hunting a…
Two firms, X and Y, are planning to market their new products. Each firm can develop TV, Laptop. Market research indicates that the resulting profits to each firm for the alternative strategies are given by the following payoff matrix : MATRIX IS ATTACHED Find the Nash equilibria for this game, assuming that both firms make their decisions at the same time. (explain the decision step by step) If each firm is risk averse and uses a maximin strategy, what will be the resulting equilibrium? (explain the decision step by step) What will be the equilibrium if Firm X makes its selection first? If Firm Y goes first?
A total of n ≥ 2 companies are considering entry into a new market. The cost of entry is 30. If only one company enters, then its gross profit is 200. If more than one company enters, then each entrant earns a gross profit of 40. The payoff to a company that enters is its gross profit minus its entry cost, while the payoff to a company that does not enter is 60. Find a symmetric Nash equilibrium in mixed strategies.
Given the stage game above/below. Suppose that the players play (C,C) in period t = 1; 3; 5; ::: and plays (D,D) in period t = 2; 4; 6; ::. Compute the discounted payoff of each player.
Economics - Game Theory & Business Strategy Inverse Market Demand for tires is P = 200 - .01Q We assume the manufacturer sets a Price, 'X', for the tires and the manufacrturer moves first, selecting 'X' before any sales decisions are made. In this variation, we assume there are 3 retail firms, each with Market Power. The firms (1,2,3) make their sales decisions (q1,q2,q3) simultaneously, taking the manufacturer's price X as given. Total market sales, Q, then equal q1 + q2 + q3. We assume the only cost for the retailers is the cost 'X' for each tire. Additionally, the manufacturer produces the tires at a Marginal Cost of $10 a tire. **** Write out the Extensive form of this game ****
Suppose that the following prisoner's dilemma game (stage game) is played repeatedly and players discount future payoffs with the common discount factor δ <1. a) Carefully specify the strategy spaces for both players, draw the extensive form game and find a subgame perfect Nash equilibrium when the stage game is played twice, and both players observe the outcome of the first play.
Burger Doodle, the incumbent firm, wishes to set a limit price of $8 (rather than the profit-maximizing price of $12) to prevent Designer Burger from entering its profitable market. The game tree above shows the payoffs for various decisions. Burger Doodle makes its pricing decision, then Designer Burger decides whether to enter or stay out of the market. If Designer Burger chooses to enter the market, then Burger Doodle may or may not decide to accommodate Designer’s entry by changing its initial price to the Nash equilibrium price of $10. If Burger Doodle canNOT make a credible commitment to maintain its initial price should Designer Burger decide to enter the market, then Burger Doodle will set price equal to $________ at decision node 1 and the outcome _____________(is, is not) a Nash equilibrium.
Is the set of SPE of any extensive form game with perfect information is identical to the set of Nash Equilibria of the induced normal form game? If yes, provide a proof. If no, provide an explanation by illustrating a game. [Maximum word limit for this question is 80 words.]
Design the payoffff matrix of a game with no Nash Equilibria. The game should have 2 players, 2 strategies for each player, and the payoffffs for each player should be either 0 or 1.