09 J0 ino 09 < Question 43 of 60 > Which of these must be TRUE of a prisoner's dilemma outcome? O There exists no other outcome that is better for both players. Neither player has a dominant strategy in the game. O There is no opportunity to collude or cooperate to improve both players' payoffs. O It is a Nash equilibrium resulting from each player using its best-response strategies.

09 J0 ino 09 < Question 43 of 60 > Which of these must be TRUE of a prisoner's dilemma outcome? O There exists no other outcome that is better for both players. Neither player has a dominant strategy in the game. O There is no opportunity to collude or cooperate to improve both players' payoffs. O It is a Nash equilibrium resulting from each player using its best-response strategies.

Microeconomic Theory

12th Edition

ISBN:9781337517942

Author:NICHOLSON

Publisher:NICHOLSON

Chapter8: Game Theory

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 8.6P

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Does each individual in a prisoners dilemma benefit more from cooperation or from pursuing self-interest? Explain briefly.
Consider the two-round bargaining game. The minimum the seller will sell his home for 188,000 and the maximum the buyer is willing to pay is $200,000. Both players know these two amounts and are bargaining over the difference (M=$1200). Assume the disagreement values are zero for both players. Player 1 moves first by making a proposal and Player 2 can accept and reject. If player 2 rejects Player’s 1 proposal, then Player 2 gets to make a proposal, which Player 1 can reject and accept. The game is then over. Suppose the both players discount the future income at the rate d=0.2 per period. That is, $0.20 now is equivalent to $1,00 received next round. Find the equilibrium for this 2-round game. a) Draw the game tree b) What is the sale price of home? c)Which player gets the larger share of M?
Someone please clear my doubt.I have posted question and got answer,i attached the ques and ans(refer image). I can't understand how q1=19800 and q2=0 in equilibrium when the two actors have the same cost and revenue functions and they act simultaneously in a one-shot game. Intuitively one would guess that a cournot equillibrium would occur when q1=q2. Am I wrong i assuming that there can be no "player business that chooses to produce first" in a one-shot simultaneous game? What am i not understanding?
Suppose that there are two firms in a market, firm 1 and firm 2. The marketis declining in size. The game starts in period 0, and the firms can compete in periods 0, 1,2, 3, ... (i.e., indefinitely) if they so choose. Duopoly profits in period t for firm 1 are equalto 105 −10t, and they are 10.5 −t for firm 2. Monopoly profits (those if a firm is the onlyone left in the market) are 510 −25t for firm 1 and 51 −2t for firm 2. At the start of eachperiod, each firm must decide either to “stay in” or “exit” if it is still active (they do sosimultaneously if both are still active). Once a firm exits, it is out of the market forever andearns zero in each period thereafter. Firms maximize their (undiscounted) sum of profits.What is this game’s subgame perfect Nash equilibrium?
Assume there are two firms X and Y, considering which of two alternative prices to charge, £25 or £19 for X and £20 or £15 for Y. The firms make their decisions simultaneously: i.e. neither firm knows the price choice of its rival. The various profits are illustrated in the following pay-off matrix: Strategies and payoffs for X are in blue and for Y in red. (a) What is firm Y’s best response to each of the two different prices firm X could charge? Does firm Y have a dominant strategy? (b)What is firm X’s best response to each of the different prices firm Y could charge? Does firm X have a dominant strategy? (C) What is/are the Nash equilibrium/equilbria? What is the most likely outcome of this game? Explain your answer.
Define the prisoner’s dilemma game. The prisoner’s dilemma game is a: two-person noncooperative sequential game that demonstrates the difficulty of cooperative behavior in certain circumstances. two-person cooperative simultaneous game that demonstrates the difficulty of cooperative behavior in certain circumstances. two-person noncooperative simultaneous game that demonstrates the difficulty of cooperative behavior in certain circumstances. two-person cooperative sequential game that demonstrates the difficulty of cooperative behavior in certain circumstances. a. What assumptions lead to the dilemma? If the prisoners confess, each would get a light sentence. But each prisoner is interrogated separately and is offered the chance to go free if he or she confesses to the crime and agrees to serve as a witness against the other prisoner. This creates the incentive for both prisoners to not confess. If the prisoners do not confess, each would get a…
13) Two identical firms are engaged in Cournot competition, with cost functionsTCA(QA) = 30 QA and TCB(QB) = 30 QB. The market demand is given by P = 480 –3Q.a) Plot the best response functions and report the Cournot-Nash equilibrium quantities, price and profits.b) What are the prices, quantities, and profits for the firms if they decide to collude and share profits equally?c) Show that firms have an incentive the deviate from the collusive outcome.d) Find the Stackelberg equilibrium if A leads and B follows.e) Show the equilibria in the previous parts on the inverse demand function. Calculate and identify consumersurplus and deadweight loss in each equilibrium. If you can only answer a limited amount of questions, please answer d and e :)
Indicate whether the following statement is TRUE or FALSE and explain your answer: If one player is the leader in a game it means that s/he has the first move in the game. The key thing is that this move can be observed by the follower before making his/her own decision, otherwise it would be a simultaneous move game that cannot be solved by backwards induction
1. What are the advantages and disadvantages of collusion? Define Collusion 2. In a Stackelberg game, what is the best response that follower firm 2 can make to the choice y1 already made by the leader, firm 1? Defining the game and provide an example of the best response.
Consider the following game where two players have to decide if they want to buy a movie ticket or a baseball ticket. They have the highest payoffs when they both buy tickets to the same activity, but must decide simultaneously what to buy without knowing what the other person will do. a. Does either player have a dominant strategy? b. How many equilibria does this game have? c. Is this an example of a prisoner’s dilemma? Explain. d. What will be the outcome if your friend buys their ticket first and you can observe their choice?
Use the information in the following table, which summarizes the payoffs (i.e., profit) to two firms that must decide between an average-quality and a high quality product, to answer the questions that follow: Firm 2 Average Quality High Quality Firm 1 Average Quality 600, 600 400, 1100 High Quality 1100, 400 900, 900 a. What is each player's dominant strategy? Explain your reasoning.b. Referring to the table above, is this an example of a prisoner's dilemma game? Why or why not?c. Is there a Nash equilibrium? If so, what is it?
A Prisoner's Dilemma occurs in military disputes when two countries use valuable resources to harm each other. True O False