Find the regression equation, letting overhead width be the predictor (x) variable. Find the best predicted weight of a seal if the overhead width measured from a photograph is 1.7 cm. Can the prediction be correct? What is wrong with predicting the weight in this case? Use a significance level of 0.05. Overhead Width (cm) 8.1 Weight (kg) 8.3 218 9.5 264 8.8 207 9.4 8.9 O 240 179 255 9 Click the icon to view the critical values of the Pearson correlation coefficient r. The regression equation is y =D•D. (Round to one decimal place as needed.) The best predicted weight for an overhead width of 1.7 cm is kg (Round to one decimal place as needed.) Can the prediction I correct? What is wrong with predicting the weight in this case? O A. The prediction cannot be correct because a negative weight does not make sense. The width in this case is beyond the scope of the available sample data. O B. The prediction cannot be correct because a negative weight does not make sense and because there is not sufficient evidence of a linear correlation. OC. The prediction cannot be correct because there is not sufficient evidence of a linear correlation. The width in this case is beyond the scope of the available sample data. OD. The prediction can be correct. There is nothing wrong with predicting the weight in this case.

Functions and Change: A Modeling Approach to College Algebra (MindTap Course List)
6th Edition
ISBN:9781337111348
Author:Bruce Crauder, Benny Evans, Alan Noell
Publisher:Bruce Crauder, Benny Evans, Alan Noell
Chapter3: Straight Lines And Linear Functions
Section3.CR: Chapter Review Exercises
Problem 15CR: Life Expectancy The following table shows the average life expectancy, in years, of a child born in...
icon
Related questions
icon
Concept explainers
Question
Find the regression equation, letting overhead width be the predictor (x) variable. Find the best predicted weight of a seal if the overhead width measured from a photograph is 1.7 cm. Can the prediction be correct? What is wrong with predicting the weight in this case? Use a significance level of 0.05.
Overhead Width (cm)
Weight (kg)
8.1
8.3
9.5
8.8
9.4
8.9
179
218
264
207
255
240
Click the icon to view the critical values of the Pearson correlation coefficient r.
The regression equation is y =O+x.
(Round to one decimal place as needed.)
The best predicted weight for an overhead width of 1.7 cm is kg.
(Round to one decimal place as needed.)
Can the prediction be correct? What is wrong with predicting the weight in this case?
O A. The prediction cannot be correct because a negative weight does not make sense. The width in this case is beyond the scope of the available sample data.
O B. The prediction cannot be correct because a negative weight does not make sense and because there is not sufficient evidence of a linear correlation.
O C. The prediction cannot be correct because there is not sufficient evidence of a linear correlation. The width in this case is beyond the scope of
available sample data.
O D. The prediction can be correct. There is nothing wrong with predicting the weight in this case.
Transcribed Image Text:Find the regression equation, letting overhead width be the predictor (x) variable. Find the best predicted weight of a seal if the overhead width measured from a photograph is 1.7 cm. Can the prediction be correct? What is wrong with predicting the weight in this case? Use a significance level of 0.05. Overhead Width (cm) Weight (kg) 8.1 8.3 9.5 8.8 9.4 8.9 179 218 264 207 255 240 Click the icon to view the critical values of the Pearson correlation coefficient r. The regression equation is y =O+x. (Round to one decimal place as needed.) The best predicted weight for an overhead width of 1.7 cm is kg. (Round to one decimal place as needed.) Can the prediction be correct? What is wrong with predicting the weight in this case? O A. The prediction cannot be correct because a negative weight does not make sense. The width in this case is beyond the scope of the available sample data. O B. The prediction cannot be correct because a negative weight does not make sense and because there is not sufficient evidence of a linear correlation. O C. The prediction cannot be correct because there is not sufficient evidence of a linear correlation. The width in this case is beyond the scope of available sample data. O D. The prediction can be correct. There is nothing wrong with predicting the weight in this case.
Expert Solution
trending now

Trending now

This is a popular solution!

steps

Step by step

Solved in 2 steps with 3 images

Blurred answer
Knowledge Booster
Correlation, Regression, and Association
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, statistics and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.
Similar questions
  • SEE MORE QUESTIONS
Recommended textbooks for you
Functions and Change: A Modeling Approach to Coll…
Functions and Change: A Modeling Approach to Coll…
Algebra
ISBN:
9781337111348
Author:
Bruce Crauder, Benny Evans, Alan Noell
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Big Ideas Math A Bridge To Success Algebra 1: Stu…
Big Ideas Math A Bridge To Success Algebra 1: Stu…
Algebra
ISBN:
9781680331141
Author:
HOUGHTON MIFFLIN HARCOURT
Publisher:
Houghton Mifflin Harcourt
Glencoe Algebra 1, Student Edition, 9780079039897…
Glencoe Algebra 1, Student Edition, 9780079039897…
Algebra
ISBN:
9780079039897
Author:
Carter
Publisher:
McGraw Hill