How does the court imply authority on an agent? 1) By examining the occupation of the agent. 2) By searching for statutory provisions relevant to the agent's occupation. 3) By analyzing the express terms of engagement of the agent. 4) By seeking the advice from the third party.

How does the court imply authority on an agent? 1) By examining the occupation of the agent. 2) By searching for statutory provisions relevant to the agent's occupation. 3) By analyzing the express terms of engagement of the agent. 4) By seeking the advice from the third party.

Managerial Economics: A Problem Solving Approach

5th Edition

ISBN:9781337106665

Author:Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike Shor

Publisher:Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike Shor

Chapter16: Bargaining

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 16.1IP

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Bill has been adjudicated by the court to be mentally incompetent. Any contract that bill would enter into would be void? True or false
H was in need of money because he has 10 dogs to feeds. To get more money, he was able to buy from a supplier 100 grams of shabu. On the day of the delivery of the shabu, the supplier did not come. May H compel the supplier to perform his duty of delivering the shabu? A. Yes. As a buyer, one of the remedies available is to compel the seller to deliver the object agreed upon. B. Yes. All the elements of the contract of sale are present. Therefore, the buyer has the right to demand from the supplier to fulfill his promise. C. No. The object of the contract of sale is illegal so there is no contract of sale between H and the supplier. D. No. The supplier was not identified in the contract of sale so H cannot demand anything from an unknown supplier.
How does the tort of conversion of personal property differ from trespass to personal property? In conversion, the true owner is denied use and enjoyment of the property. In conversion, the true owner can recover damages for the denial of use of the property. In conversion, the tortfeasor treats the property as if it is his/her own. In conversion, the plaintiff is entitled to recover punitive damages. In conversion, the defendant must have published his/her use of the property to another.
1. An agent owes the highest degree of diligent and loyal service to: Group of answer choices none of the choices. his or her family. the principal. his or her own interests. 2. Regarding the Courts of Appeals, California is in the: Group of answer choices 1st circuit. 3rd circuit. vegetarian circuit. 9th circuit. 3. A contract heavily weighted in the favor of the drafting party, and putting the consumer in a much weaker position, is known as a: Group of answer choices contract of acceptance. contract of assent. contract of understanding. contract of adheasion. 4. Tender occurs when a party makes an offer of performance and is: Group of answer choices all of the choices. willing to perform. able to perform. ready to perform.
The Fifth Amendment provides for protection from self-incrimination in a criminal setting. The fourth amendment allows a citizen to be searched without a warrant. Under exigent circumstances Never Always Sometimes
Have you come across instances of agency problems in your professional or personal life? Please explain briefly ( in 3-4 sentences) who the principal and agent are and what lead to the principal-agent problem. You can also use a recent (preferably after 2015) example from the business world to illustrate the above if you do not have an example from your professional or personal life. Avoid examples of Enron, Goldman Sachs, Bernie Madoff scandal, Boeing, and Worldcom. You can enter your answer as a comment (text, audio, etc.) at the end of the video.
Parker Plaintiff is in a hurry and stops by a convenience store for a drink. The store is out of her favorite brand of soda, so Parker decides to go elsewhere. Before Parker can leave, she is stopped by a store employee that accuses her of shoplifting. The employee escorts Parker to a small room in the back of the store and tells Parker that if she attempts to leave the room, she will be arrested and sent to jail. Parker waits for over an hour before the manager tells her that she is free to go. What advice would you give Parker? Discuss the possible tort claim Parker might have against the store. Be sure to include the elements of the tort and relate those elements to the scenario. If Parker decides to pursue a claim against the store, should she consider a lawsuit, mediation, or arbitration? explain why your choice is the best option.
True or false 1. A perceived disadvantage of Rawls's social justice theory is that it does not consider the fact that people would not want to maximize benefits for the least advantaged persons 2. Ethical relativism is a moral theory which holds that individuals must decide what is ethical based on their own feelings about what is right and wrong. 3. Utilitarianism is a moral theory that chooses the greatest good to society but does not mean the greatest good for the greatest number of people. 4. According to Rawls's “social justice” theory, a person who is in a state of "veil of ignorance" is best fit to select the fairest possible ethical principles. Please help, & thank you!
A pizza parlor owner uses a vending machine company to service his soft drinks.The owner of the company sells his route to Mr X and delegates all of his contractsincluding the one with the pizza parlor. This enrages the pizza parlor owner, because Mr. X was engaged to the pizza parlor owner's sister and left her standing at the altar. He claims that the obligation is non-delegable because it's "personal". Do you agree
What is the impact of compromising certainty in the interest of justice? Are there particular applications in your line of work or your organization.
Problem: Consider a state in which automobile drivers are divided equally into two types of drivers: careful and reckless. The average annual auto-insurance claim is $400 for a careful driver and $1,200 for a reckless driver. Suppose that the state adopts an insurance system under which all drivers are placed in a common pool and allocated to insurance companies randomly. An insurance company cannot refuse coverage to any consumer it is assigned, but a consumer who is unhappy with the insurance company has the option of being reassigned (randomly) to another. By law, each insurance company must charge the same price to all its customers (i.e. no price discrimination). Assume that the insurance market is perfectly competitive and that claims represent all the costs associated with provision of insurance. Predict the minimum price of auto insurance under two alternative policy scenarios given below. Show all of your work and explain your answers. A. Auto insurance is mandatory B. Auto…
Questions 1. Even though Professor Ramirez deviated from the college’s policy regarding plagiarism, do you feel that she acted ethically? 2. If you were a student in this class and learned Professor Ramirez made an exception for this student, would you think she acted ethically? Explain. 3. In Table 12.1, the Six Pillars of Character are detailed. Which of these six pillars did Professor Ramirez display in consideration for her student, and how? 4. Professor Ramirez’s actions ultimately brought into question whether or not the ends justify the means. Do you feel that her leniency in this case made her a stronger or more ethical leader? Explain.