Identifiers declared inside a block: scope { // block begins int x; // local in block x = 9; System.out.println (x) ; } // block ends have block scope, are called local variables and are visible only inside the block. Local variables in different blocks may have the same name. What is the output of the program? public static void main (String [] a) { int x; // local in main } } x = 1 ; System.out.println("Main x " + x); methodl () ; void methodl () { } System.out.println("Main x " + x); method2 () ; int x= 0; // local in method System.out.println ("methodl x"+ x); void method2 () { System.out.println ("method2 x"+ x);

Reviewing this program address the following points: Design/Implementation: Are there noticeable issues/flaws in the design and implementation of the code? How would you remedy such issues? Readability: Is the code well organized and easy to follow? Can you understand what is going on, easily? Documentation: Is the documentation well-written? does it explain what the code is accomplishing and how? Remember good documentation includes descriptive variable and function names in addition to clear/concise annotation. Efficiency: Was the code efficient, without sacrificing readability and understanding? #include <iostream> using namespace std; int main() {    double meal, tax, tip, total; //create variables    double taxPercentage = .0675, tipPercentage = .2; //initiate percentage values        cout << "Enter a meal charge: \n";    cin >> meal; //enter meal        tax = meal * taxPercentage;    tip = (meal + tax) * tipPercentage;    total = meal+tax+tip;         cout…

The question is whether or not all declaration statements result in a fixed memory reservation.