gross margin of only 23 cents perbottle (13 percent), even at the higher retail price of $3.99 perbottle. Alice finally decided to upgrade the bottle and label to a unique, tall, triangular, Italian glass bottle and cork, with gold and black labels and recipe hang-tags by alocal design studio. Shesold the dressings directly to upscale s pecialty and grocerystores. Distributors would notbeused.Specialtybrokers were hired to aid in selling directly, at a 10 percentcommission on netsales. The premium pricingwas also retained in this non-elas tic, low-price- sensitivity marketsegment, with the new bottles retailing at $4.99 each. Final netfactory s ales perbottle were $2.69 afterdeducting 10 percent brokerage commis sions,with netfactory profits of $1.10/botile. Specialty food stores took a 40 percentgross margin, butpaid fors hipping. Packaging and pricing decisions are intimately related to dis trībutionand sales force decisions: Alice's res taurant could have made severaldifferent dis tubution decis ions, with different packaging and pricing results: Sell the salad dressings only from the restaurant in 32-ounce jars with handmade black and white labels at$5.00 each. This distribution and sales decision requires the leastamountofextraresources, s pending, and ris k. This also provides the smallestpotentialsales retum. Sell the dressings directly to all consumers through mail order or other marketing channels with family members handling both marketing and s ales. This distribution and sales decisionis a variation onselling only from the restaurant and may require additional resources to manage and grow, butit delivers better returns thanselling only to local restaurant cus tomers. Sell through DSD (Direct Store Delivery) distributors. This distribution and sales decision requires financial res ources, management time, personnel, higher margins, and spending support, butmaybe the fas tes tway to grow the business. Hirebrokers for store and/or distributor sales. This sales decision depends uponscope of operations and geographic and dis tribu tionchannelexpansion plans. Combine severaldistribution channels simultaneo usly. This distribution and s ales decision calls for the largestamuntof resources, time and pers onnel, with the objective of growing the business as fastas possible. License the formulas and restaurant name to another manufacturer and receive a 4 percent to 5 percent royalty on nets ales. This dis trībutionand sales decis ion is also low-risk, with low-resource requirements. The long-tem potential returm is much higher than selling outofa single res taurant. Sell a different size bottle or jar directly to stores only, as Alice finally decided to do. This dis tribution and sales decis ionpreserves higher gross margins and eliminates discounts to dis tributors and possiblys ales commissions to brokers, butrequires more financing, management persomel and time. Case Study: Alice's Dressings Distributions ys tems may evolve over time as abusiness grows and changes. Consider a small one-store family res taurant named Alice's, with delicious, unique, homemade salad dressings (e.g., Pomegranate Vinaigrette, Rum-Rais in-Orange Ranch, Bhue Cheese Catalina). Initially, the dressings were only availab le to customers eating at Alice's. Then cus tomers begin requestingbottles to buy. Initial sales and distributionof Alice's Salad Dressings were from the res taurant to walk-in cus tomes. The product was packaged in a 32-ounce canning jarwith a handmade label. New distribution channeks cause packaging and pricing changes. Then Alice's Dressings were sold to a local grocerystore at a discounted wholes ale price, 28 percent less per ounce than the retail res taurant price, packaged in asmaller, 26-ounce bottle. As local demand grew, Alice decided to have the dressings made in an independent packing facility and sold to other s tores in the area, which initially rais ed the costof making the dressings. Alice's lusband, brothers, and asister-in-law divided up initial sales res ponsibilities to callonlocal and regionalstores in their s pare time. The popularity of Alice's Dressings caused Alice to consider the possibility of selling large pallet quantities to dis tributors in other s tates. The dis tubutors needed another 25 percent dis count fromwholesale price, alongwith free s hipping. Sales brokers were also recommended, at 5 percent commis sionon netdistributors ales, since the family could no longer call oneveryone. A separate companywould have to be setup to market the s alad dressings; an enterprise requiring full-time management. Distribution channeks are ley to pricing and packaging decisions. In this case, a separate business, new dis tribution chamels and sales representation grew outof Alice's initial one-store restaurart. Alice's restaurantwas initially able to sell the salad dressings at $5.00 per 32-ounce jar (15.6cents perounce) directly to customers. However, once adecisionwas made to sell Alice's Dressings as ashelf-s table item in grocery s tores, the bottles changed to astandard 26-ounce size to compete with other dressings sold in this size. Alice was concemed that grocery consumes, unfamiliarwith the restaurant, would not pay over $3.99 retail per 26-ouncebottle when competing brands ranged from $1.29 b $2.69 for the same 26-ource size. Wholes ale prices were 28 percert less than retail, at $2.89 perbottle. However, the costof ingredients was substantially more than competing brands, at$1.00 perbottle, and packaging and processing costs added another $0.50 perbottle. Profits were reduced from restaurants ales perbottle, butstill acceptab le (i.e., from $3.50 abottle, or 11 cents per ounce, to $1.39 perbottle, or five cents perounce), since the total amountofsales and profits were expected to be substantially greater through grocery s ales. Further researchwith marketing experts in the industy and sales brokers indicated a further 40 percent reduction in delivered distrībutor price (inchudingbrokeage commissions and shipping costs). Alicewould net $1.73 perbottle at delivered distrībutor price withbrokerage commissions of 5 percent, leaving anunacceptable

Principles Of Marketing
17th Edition
ISBN:9780134492513
Author:Kotler, Philip, Armstrong, Gary (gary M.)
Publisher:Kotler, Philip, Armstrong, Gary (gary M.)
Chapter1: Marketing: Creating Customer Value And Engagement
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 1.1DQ
icon
Related questions
Question
  1. What should Alice’s have done?
  2. Based on your personal research, what distribution approach(es) would you use if you Alice’s was your company? Why?
  3. How do your ideas relate to your target market(s), does your research change the approach to the channel(s)? Why/why not?
gross margin of only 23 cents perbottle (13 percent), even at the higher retail price of
$3.99 perbottle.
Alice finally decided to upgrade the bottle and label to a unique, tall, triangular, Italian
glass bottle and cork, with gold and black labels and recipe hang-tags by alocal design
studio. Shesold the dressings directly to upscale s pecialty and grocerystores.
Distributors would notbeused.Specialtybrokers were hired to aid in selling directly,
at a 10 percentcommission on netsales. The premium pricingwas also retained in this
non-elas tic, low-price- sensitivity marketsegment, with the new bottles retailing at
$4.99 each. Final netfactory s ales perbottle were $2.69 afterdeducting 10 percent
brokerage commis sions,with netfactory profits of $1.10/botile. Specialty food stores
took a 40 percentgross margin, butpaid fors hipping.
Packaging and pricing decisions are intimately related to dis trībutionand sales force
decisions: Alice's res taurant could have made severaldifferent dis tubution decis ions,
with different packaging and pricing results:
Sell the salad dressings only from the restaurant in 32-ounce jars with
handmade black and white labels at$5.00 each. This distribution and sales
decision requires the leastamountofextraresources, s pending, and ris k. This
also provides the smallestpotentialsales retum.
Sell the dressings directly to all consumers through mail order or other
marketing channels with family members handling both marketing and s ales.
This distribution and sales decisionis a variation onselling only from the
restaurant and may require additional resources to manage and grow, butit
delivers better returns thanselling only to local restaurant cus tomers.
Sell through DSD (Direct Store Delivery) distributors. This distribution and
sales decision requires financial res ources, management time, personnel, higher
margins, and spending support, butmaybe the fas tes tway to grow the
business.
Hirebrokers for store and/or distributor sales. This sales decision depends
uponscope of operations and geographic and dis tribu tionchannelexpansion
plans.
Combine severaldistribution channels simultaneo usly. This distribution and
s ales decision calls for the largestamuntof resources, time and pers onnel,
with the objective of growing the business as fastas possible.
License the formulas and restaurant name to another manufacturer and
receive a 4 percent to 5 percent royalty on nets ales. This dis trībutionand sales
decis ion is also low-risk, with low-resource requirements. The long-tem
potential returm is much higher than selling outofa single res taurant.
Sell a different size bottle or jar directly to stores only, as Alice finally
decided to do. This dis tribution and sales decis ionpreserves higher gross
margins and eliminates discounts to dis tributors and possiblys ales
commissions to brokers, butrequires more financing, management persomel
and time.
Transcribed Image Text:gross margin of only 23 cents perbottle (13 percent), even at the higher retail price of $3.99 perbottle. Alice finally decided to upgrade the bottle and label to a unique, tall, triangular, Italian glass bottle and cork, with gold and black labels and recipe hang-tags by alocal design studio. Shesold the dressings directly to upscale s pecialty and grocerystores. Distributors would notbeused.Specialtybrokers were hired to aid in selling directly, at a 10 percentcommission on netsales. The premium pricingwas also retained in this non-elas tic, low-price- sensitivity marketsegment, with the new bottles retailing at $4.99 each. Final netfactory s ales perbottle were $2.69 afterdeducting 10 percent brokerage commis sions,with netfactory profits of $1.10/botile. Specialty food stores took a 40 percentgross margin, butpaid fors hipping. Packaging and pricing decisions are intimately related to dis trībutionand sales force decisions: Alice's res taurant could have made severaldifferent dis tubution decis ions, with different packaging and pricing results: Sell the salad dressings only from the restaurant in 32-ounce jars with handmade black and white labels at$5.00 each. This distribution and sales decision requires the leastamountofextraresources, s pending, and ris k. This also provides the smallestpotentialsales retum. Sell the dressings directly to all consumers through mail order or other marketing channels with family members handling both marketing and s ales. This distribution and sales decisionis a variation onselling only from the restaurant and may require additional resources to manage and grow, butit delivers better returns thanselling only to local restaurant cus tomers. Sell through DSD (Direct Store Delivery) distributors. This distribution and sales decision requires financial res ources, management time, personnel, higher margins, and spending support, butmaybe the fas tes tway to grow the business. Hirebrokers for store and/or distributor sales. This sales decision depends uponscope of operations and geographic and dis tribu tionchannelexpansion plans. Combine severaldistribution channels simultaneo usly. This distribution and s ales decision calls for the largestamuntof resources, time and pers onnel, with the objective of growing the business as fastas possible. License the formulas and restaurant name to another manufacturer and receive a 4 percent to 5 percent royalty on nets ales. This dis trībutionand sales decis ion is also low-risk, with low-resource requirements. The long-tem potential returm is much higher than selling outofa single res taurant. Sell a different size bottle or jar directly to stores only, as Alice finally decided to do. This dis tribution and sales decis ionpreserves higher gross margins and eliminates discounts to dis tributors and possiblys ales commissions to brokers, butrequires more financing, management persomel and time.
Case Study: Alice's Dressings
Distributions ys tems may evolve over time as abusiness grows and changes. Consider
a small one-store family res taurant named Alice's, with delicious, unique, homemade
salad dressings (e.g., Pomegranate Vinaigrette, Rum-Rais in-Orange Ranch, Bhue
Cheese Catalina). Initially, the dressings were only availab le to customers eating at
Alice's. Then cus tomers begin requestingbottles to buy. Initial sales and distributionof
Alice's Salad Dressings were from the res taurant to walk-in cus tomes. The product
was packaged in a 32-ounce canning jarwith a handmade label.
New distribution channeks cause packaging and pricing changes. Then Alice's
Dressings were sold to a local grocerystore at a discounted wholes ale price, 28
percent less per ounce than the retail res taurant price, packaged in asmaller, 26-ounce
bottle. As local demand grew, Alice decided to have the dressings made in an
independent packing facility and sold to other s tores in the area, which initially rais ed
the costof making the dressings. Alice's lusband, brothers, and asister-in-law divided
up initial sales res ponsibilities to callonlocal and regionalstores in their s pare time.
The popularity of Alice's Dressings caused Alice to consider the possibility of selling
large pallet quantities to dis tributors in other s tates. The dis tubutors needed another 25
percent dis count fromwholesale price, alongwith free s hipping. Sales brokers were
also recommended, at 5 percent commis sionon netdistributors ales, since the family
could no longer call oneveryone. A separate companywould have to be setup to
market the s alad dressings; an enterprise requiring full-time management.
Distribution channeks are ley to pricing and packaging decisions. In this case, a
separate business, new dis tribution chamels and sales representation grew outof
Alice's initial one-store restaurart. Alice's restaurantwas initially able to sell the salad
dressings at $5.00 per 32-ounce jar (15.6cents perounce) directly to customers.
However, once adecisionwas made to sell Alice's Dressings as ashelf-s table item in
grocery s tores, the bottles changed to astandard 26-ounce size to compete with other
dressings sold in this size.
Alice was concemed that grocery consumes, unfamiliarwith the restaurant, would not
pay over $3.99 retail per 26-ouncebottle when competing brands ranged from $1.29 b
$2.69 for the same 26-ource size. Wholes ale prices were 28 percert less than retail, at
$2.89 perbottle. However, the costof ingredients was substantially more than
competing brands, at$1.00 perbottle, and packaging and processing costs added
another $0.50 perbottle. Profits were reduced from restaurants ales perbottle, butstill
acceptab le (i.e., from $3.50 abottle, or 11 cents per ounce, to $1.39 perbottle, or five
cents perounce), since the total amountofsales and profits were expected to be
substantially greater through grocery s ales.
Further researchwith marketing experts in the industy and sales brokers indicated a
further 40 percent reduction in delivered distrībutor price (inchudingbrokeage
commissions and shipping costs). Alicewould net $1.73 perbottle at delivered
distrībutor price withbrokerage commissions of 5 percent, leaving anunacceptable
Transcribed Image Text:Case Study: Alice's Dressings Distributions ys tems may evolve over time as abusiness grows and changes. Consider a small one-store family res taurant named Alice's, with delicious, unique, homemade salad dressings (e.g., Pomegranate Vinaigrette, Rum-Rais in-Orange Ranch, Bhue Cheese Catalina). Initially, the dressings were only availab le to customers eating at Alice's. Then cus tomers begin requestingbottles to buy. Initial sales and distributionof Alice's Salad Dressings were from the res taurant to walk-in cus tomes. The product was packaged in a 32-ounce canning jarwith a handmade label. New distribution channeks cause packaging and pricing changes. Then Alice's Dressings were sold to a local grocerystore at a discounted wholes ale price, 28 percent less per ounce than the retail res taurant price, packaged in asmaller, 26-ounce bottle. As local demand grew, Alice decided to have the dressings made in an independent packing facility and sold to other s tores in the area, which initially rais ed the costof making the dressings. Alice's lusband, brothers, and asister-in-law divided up initial sales res ponsibilities to callonlocal and regionalstores in their s pare time. The popularity of Alice's Dressings caused Alice to consider the possibility of selling large pallet quantities to dis tributors in other s tates. The dis tubutors needed another 25 percent dis count fromwholesale price, alongwith free s hipping. Sales brokers were also recommended, at 5 percent commis sionon netdistributors ales, since the family could no longer call oneveryone. A separate companywould have to be setup to market the s alad dressings; an enterprise requiring full-time management. Distribution channeks are ley to pricing and packaging decisions. In this case, a separate business, new dis tribution chamels and sales representation grew outof Alice's initial one-store restaurart. Alice's restaurantwas initially able to sell the salad dressings at $5.00 per 32-ounce jar (15.6cents perounce) directly to customers. However, once adecisionwas made to sell Alice's Dressings as ashelf-s table item in grocery s tores, the bottles changed to astandard 26-ounce size to compete with other dressings sold in this size. Alice was concemed that grocery consumes, unfamiliarwith the restaurant, would not pay over $3.99 retail per 26-ouncebottle when competing brands ranged from $1.29 b $2.69 for the same 26-ource size. Wholes ale prices were 28 percert less than retail, at $2.89 perbottle. However, the costof ingredients was substantially more than competing brands, at$1.00 perbottle, and packaging and processing costs added another $0.50 perbottle. Profits were reduced from restaurants ales perbottle, butstill acceptab le (i.e., from $3.50 abottle, or 11 cents per ounce, to $1.39 perbottle, or five cents perounce), since the total amountofsales and profits were expected to be substantially greater through grocery s ales. Further researchwith marketing experts in the industy and sales brokers indicated a further 40 percent reduction in delivered distrībutor price (inchudingbrokeage commissions and shipping costs). Alicewould net $1.73 perbottle at delivered distrībutor price withbrokerage commissions of 5 percent, leaving anunacceptable
Expert Solution
trending now

Trending now

This is a popular solution!

steps

Step by step

Solved in 4 steps

Blurred answer
Similar questions
  • SEE MORE QUESTIONS
Recommended textbooks for you
Principles Of Marketing
Principles Of Marketing
Marketing
ISBN:
9780134492513
Author:
Kotler, Philip, Armstrong, Gary (gary M.)
Publisher:
Pearson Higher Education,
Marketing
Marketing
Marketing
ISBN:
9781259924040
Author:
Roger A. Kerin, Steven W. Hartley
Publisher:
McGraw-Hill Education
Foundations of Business (MindTap Course List)
Foundations of Business (MindTap Course List)
Marketing
ISBN:
9781337386920
Author:
William M. Pride, Robert J. Hughes, Jack R. Kapoor
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Marketing: An Introduction (13th Edition)
Marketing: An Introduction (13th Edition)
Marketing
ISBN:
9780134149530
Author:
Gary Armstrong, Philip Kotler
Publisher:
PEARSON
MKTG 12:STUDENT ED.-TEXT
MKTG 12:STUDENT ED.-TEXT
Marketing
ISBN:
9781337407595
Author:
Lamb
Publisher:
Cengage
Contemporary Marketing
Contemporary Marketing
Marketing
ISBN:
9780357033777
Author:
Louis E. Boone, David L. Kurtz
Publisher:
Cengage Learning