Poverty analysis. Suppose the village of Utopia has 5 households, with expenditure levels [1, 4, 5, 9 and 13]. Suppose the poverty line is 5. Suppose in the nearby village of Dystopia, P0=0.4, P1=0.3 and P2=0.16. As a policymaker which group of population would you prioritize for poverty reduction, with a limited budget? Note that there is no right or wrong answer in this context. What matters is how well you can justify your answer

Poverty analysis. Suppose the village of Utopia has 5 households, with expenditure levels [1, 4, 5, 9 and 13]. Suppose the poverty line is 5. Suppose in the nearby village of Dystopia, P0=0.4, P1=0.3 and P2=0.16. As a policymaker which group of population would you prioritize for poverty reduction, with a limited budget? Note that there is no right or wrong answer in this context. What matters is how well you can justify your answer

Economics For Today

10th Edition

ISBN:9781337613040

Author:Tucker

Publisher:Tucker

Chapter12: Income Distribution, Poverty, And Discrimination

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 6SQ

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Consider three ways of helping poor people to buy food, clothing, and shelter. The first way is to pass laws setting price ceilings to keep these basic goods affordable. The second is to have the government distribute coupons that give poor people a discount when they buy these necessities. The third is for the government to distribute income to poor people. Explain which programme is more likely to have a Pareto-efficient outcome, and explain why the other programmes are less likely to be Pareto-efficient.
Which of the following is an example of a positive economic statement? a.The government should not be involved in the income redistribution schemes. b.The after-tax distribution of income is more equal than the pre-tax distribution of income. c.The distribution of income in the United States should be more equal. d.The tax system should be more progressive so that the after-tax distribution of income can be more equal.
Many government assistance programs phase-out as recipients' income increases. The government can reduce the poverty trap by having this phase-out happen Question 25 options: more slowly. more quickly. completely once the recipient earns any income at all. there is no connection between phase-out rate and the poverty trap.
Case Study: Inequality, Poverty and WealthA study reported in 2001 discovered that relatively poor people give more generously to charitythan those with greater wealth. The project, entitled “The Widow’s Might: How CharitiesDepend on the Poor”, was conducted by Beth Egan of the Social Market Foundation, whoexamined the contributions of over 1000 individuals to ten British charities. It was found thatalthough richer people gave more money in absolute terms, this comprised a smallerproportion of their overall income than was the case for the poor: in other words, the lower aperson’s income, the more of their earnings they donated to charity. For example, those withan annual income of under £5000 gave away an average of 4.5% in donations, whereas forthose with salaries of over £40,000, the figure was only 2%. The journalist Lucy Ward suggeststhat this challenges the assumption most of us hold that charities redistribute income from therich to the poor: instead, it would seem that…
Which one of the following is the most likely to be associated with an increase in the incidence of poverty? A) The Gini coefficient falls substantially. B) The number of single persons with children and of single pensioners has increased substantially. C) The real income of those in the top 20% of income earners falls by 10%. D) The number of people earning below the level of income support has decreased.
Suppose Inequality decreases without growth of mean incomes. What may likely happen to poverty? Suppose growth of mean income occurs without a change in inequality. What may likely happen to poverty? Explain Note:- Do not provide handwritten solution. Maintain accuracy and quality in your answer. Take care of plagiarism. Answer completely. You will get up vote for sure.
- It is reported in the news that the Malaysian Government will continue to focus on reducing the country's poverty rate, particularly, following the Covid-19 outbreak. The pandemic has affected people’s livelihood, resulting in rising incidence of poverty. Since (the poor) and (the needy) are two of the eight categories of asnaf (zakat recipients), zakat authorities need to increase the amount of zakat and sadaqah collections to address the rising incidence of poverty. With the use of specific examples, suggest and explain in detail 3 (THREE) strategies that the zakat authorities could implement to increase the collections of contributions.
[Make sure your answer is structured as a short essay, i.e., with short introduction (3-4 sentences), outlining each reason in a short paragraph, and a brief conclusion (2-3 sentences)]. Suppose you are advising the government of Nigeria on effective poverty reduction strategies for the country. The policy makers strongly believe that rapid economic growth is the most effective channel to reduce poverty. They also argue that the same strategy would also reduce inequality. What would be your advice to the Nigerian government in this context? Would you endorse their proposition? Why or why not? Give at least three reasons in support of your recommendation, making precise use of the concepts related to the relationship between poverty, inequality and economic growth.
The table below is an illustration of Pareto efficiency criterion after the implementation of a state income policy in some selected Ministries . Before policy. After policy Ministry A. 400 800 Ministry B. 200 200 Ministry C . 300 300 Total. 900 1300 Is there a Pareto improvement? Why?
Suppose the government rescinds a business tax that had been used to fund an income assistance program for the poor. The decision to rescind the tax implies that, in this case, the government a. values efficiency more than equity. b. values income transfers to the poor. c. profits from collecting taxes. d. values equity more than efficiency.
Assume a society consists of two economic groups: one group is rich and the other group is poor. Suppose that 50 percent of the population is rich while the other 50 percent of the population is poor. Consider two scenarios. Scenario A: The rich have $80,000 each, while the poor have $5,000 each. Scenario B: The rich have $11,000 each, while the poor have $900 each. If you only care about average income and not about equity, you would prefer ▼ Scenario A Scenario B , which has an average income of $........?? (Enter your response to the nearest dollar.) Now suppose that you only care about equity or inequality. In this case, you would prefer ▼ Scenario B Scenario A , which has a rich-to-poor ratio of .........?? (Round your response to one decimal place.) Finally, suppose you only care about living standards. In this case, you would prefer ▼ Scenario A Scenario B because it has lower poverty.
Suppose that Eric believes that the government should aim to raise the welfare of the poorest people in society, because if we all started in the exact same position in life and then created rules and laws to obey as a society, people would be concerned about ending up at the bottom of the income distribution. Which redistributive philosophy is consistent with Eric's view? Utilitarianism Liberalism Libertarianism.