question 4Chen et al. (2000) examined the foraging behaviour of northern elephant seals (Mirounga angustirostris) that breed along the west coast of Mexico and the USA. They attached platform satellite transmitter terminals (PTTs) to 22 male seals and recorded, for each seal, the distance (km) to its main feeding area offshore and the amount of time (days) it spent at the feeding area. The results are presented below: What two null hypotheses are being tested with the output shown above? What statistical conclusions would you draw about these hypotheses? Complete the regression equation by filling in the blanks (to the nearest 3 decimal places). duration = + * distance What is one biological interpretation of this relationship between duration and distance ? What % of the variation in duration at main feeding area was explained by distance to feeding area? Call:1m (formula = duration ~ distance, data = Dataset)Residuals:Min1Q Median3Q-41.259 -5.804 1.950 6.859Coefficients:Max30.703Estimate Std. Error t value Pr (>|t|)77.1775057.996893-0.009211 0.002509 -3.671 0.00152 **Signif. codes: 0¹*** 0.001 ** 0.01 * 0.05 .0.1¹¹1Residual standard error: 15.14 on 20 degrees of freedomMultiple R-squared: 0.4026, Adjusted R-squared: 0.3727F-statistic: 13.48 on 1 and 20 DF, p-value: 0.001515(Intercept)distance9.651 5.73e-09 ***

The regression equation explains the relationship between the independent and dependent variables.…

Answered: question 4 Chen et al. (2000) examined…

Algebra & Trigonometry with Analytic Geometry

13th Edition

ISBN:9781133382119

Author:Swokowski

Publisher:Swokowski

Chapter3: Functions And Graphs

Section3.3: Lines

Problem 76E

See similar textbooks

Related questions

Question

question 4

Chen et al. (2000) examined the foraging behaviour of northern elephant seals (Mirounga angustirostris) that breed along the west coast of Mexico and the USA. They attached platform satellite transmitter terminals (PTTs) to 22 male seals and recorded, for each seal, the distance (km) to its main feeding area offshore and the amount of time (days) it spent at the feeding area. The results are presented below:

What two null hypotheses are being tested with the output shown above?
What statistical conclusions would you draw about these hypotheses?
Complete the regression equation by filling in the blanks (to the nearest 3 decimal places).

duration = + * distance

What is one biological interpretation of this relationship between duration and distance ?
What % of the variation in duration at main feeding area was explained by distance to feeding area?