The standard price of materials is $3.6 per pound and the standard quantity allowed for actual output is 5620 pounds. If the actual quantity purchased and used was 5070 pounds, and the actual price per pound was $4.7, the direct materials quantity variance is Indicate whether the variance is F (favorable) or U (Unfavorable) by placing the letter next to the amount. For example, if your answer is 1,000 Favorable, answer 1000F, Do not use a space between the amount and the letter. Show your answer as an absolute number (no negative signs)

The standard price of materials is $3.6 per pound and the standard quantity allowed for actual output is 5620 pounds. If the actual quantity purchased and used was 5070 pounds, and the actual price per pound was $4.7, the direct materials quantity variance is Indicate whether the variance is F (favorable) or U (Unfavorable) by placing the letter next to the amount. For example, if your answer is 1,000 Favorable, answer 1000F, Do not use a space between the amount and the letter. Show your answer as an absolute number (no negative signs)

Name: QUESTION 8VThe standard price of materials is $3.6 per pound and the
Uploaded: 2024-03-20T06:33:06.000Z
Channel: Bartleby
Description: QUESTION 8VThe standard price of materials is $3.6 per pound and the standard quantity allowed for actual output is 5620 pounds. If theactual quantity purchased and used was 5070 pounds, and the actual price per pound was $4.7, the direct materials

Managerial Accounting

15th Edition

ISBN:9781337912020

Author:Carl Warren, Ph.d. Cma William B. Tayler

Publisher:Carl Warren, Ph.d. Cma William B. Tayler

Chapter9: Evaluating Variances From Standard Costs

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1BE: Direct materials variances Bellingham Company produces a product that requires 2.5 standard pounds...

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Direct materials variances Bellingham Company produces a product that requires 2.5 standard pounds per unit. The standard price is 3.75 per pound. If 15,000 units used 36,000 pounds, which were purchased at 4.00 per pound, what is the direct materials (A) price variance, (B) quantity variance, and (C) cost variance?
Refer to Exercise 9.17. Chypre, Inc., purchased the amount used of each direct material input on May 2 for the following actual prices: solvent mix for 5.20 per gallon, and aromatic compound for 8,010 per gallon. Required: 1. Compute and journalize the direct materials price variances. 2. Compute and journalize the direct materials usage variances. 3. Offer some possible reasons for why the variances occurred. Chypre, Inc., produces a cologne mist using a solvent mix (water and pure alcohol) and aromatic compounds (the scent base) that it sells to other companies for bottling and sale to consumers. Chypre developed the following standard cost sheet: On May 2, Chypre produced a batch of 1,000 gallons with the following actual results: Required: 1. Calculate the yield ratio. 2. Calculate the standard cost per unit of the yield. (Round to the nearest cent.) 3. Calculate the direct materials yield variance. (Round to the nearest cent.) 4. Calculate the direct materials mix variance. (Round to the nearest cent.)
Variances Refer to Cornerstone Exercise 9.6. Required: 1. Calculate the variable overhead spending variance using the formula approach. (If you compute the actual variable overhead rate, carry your computations out to five significant digits and round the variance to the nearest dollar.) 2. Calculate the variable overhead efficiency variance using the formula approach. 3. Calculate the variable overhead spending variance and variable overhead efficiency variance using the three-pronged graphical approach. 4. What if 26,100 direct labor hours were actually worked in February? What impact would that have had on the variable overhead spending variance? On the variable overhead efficiency variance? Standish Company manufactures consumer products and provided the following information for the month of February: Required: 1. Calculate the fixed overhead spending variance using the formula approach. 2. Calculate the volume variance using the formula approach. 3. Calculate the fixed overhead spending variance and volume variance using the three-pronged graphical approach. 4. What if 129,600 units had actually been produced in February? What impact would that have had on the fixed overhead spending variance? On the volume variance?
Refer to Cornerstone Exercise 9.9. Required: 1. Calculate the yield ratio based on the standard amounts given. 2. Calculate the standard cost per pound of the yield (rounded to the nearest cent). 3. Calculate the standard yield for actual input of 2,000 pounds of direct materials. 4. Calculate the yield variance. 5. What if the total 2,000 pounds of direct materials put into process resulted in a yield of 825 pizzas? How would that affect the yield variance? Mangia Pizza Company makes frozen pizzas that are sold through grocery stores. Mangia uses two types of direct labor: machine operators and packers. Mangia developed the following standard mix for spreading on premade pizza shells to produce 16 giant-size sausage pizzas. Mangias recent batch (designed to produce 400 pizzas) used 400 direct labor hours. Of the total, 160 were for machine operators, and the remaining 240 hours were for packers. The actual yield was 780 pizzas. Required: 1. Calculate the standard mix (SM) in hours for machine operators and for packers. 2. Calculate the mix variance. 3. Calculate the actual proportion of hours worked by machine operators and by packers. Use these results to explain the direction (favorable or unfavorable) of the mix variance. 4. What if of the total 400 direct labor hours worked, 200 were worked by each type of direct labor? How would that affect the mix variance?
Refer to the data in Exercise 9.15. Required: 1. Compute overhead variances using a two-variance analysis. 2. Compute overhead variances using a three-variance analysis. 3. Illustrate how the two- and three-variance analyses are related to the four-variance analysis. Oerstman, Inc., uses a standard costing system and develops its overhead rates from the current annual budget. The budget is based on an expected annual output of 120,000 units requiring 480,000 direct labor hours. (Practical capacity is 500,000 hours.) Annual budgeted overhead costs total 787,200, of which 556,800 is fixed overhead. A total of 119,400 units using 478,000 direct labor hours were produced during the year. Actual variable overhead costs for the year were 230,600, and actual fixed overhead costs were 556,250. Required: 1. Compute the fixed overhead spending and volume variances. How would you interpret the spending variance? Discuss the possible interpretations of the volume variance. Which is most appropriate for this example? 2. Compute the variable overhead spending and efficiency variances. How is the variable overhead spending variance like the price variances of direct labor and direct materials? How is it different? How is the variable overhead efficiency variance related to the direct labor efficiency variance?
Variance interpretation You have been asked to investigate some cost problems in the Assembly Department of Ruthenium Electronics Co., a consumer electronics company. To begin your investigation, you have obtained the following budget performance report for the department for the last quarter. Ruthenium Electronics Co.Assembly Department Quarterly Budget Performance Report Standard Quantity at Standard Rates Actual Quantity at Standard Rates Quantity Variances Direct labor 157,500 227,500 70,000 U Direct materials 297,500 385,000 87,500 U Total 455,000 612,500 157,500 U You also obtained the following reports: Ruthenium Electronics Co.Purchasing Department Quarterly Budget Performance Report Actual Quantity at Standard Rates Actual Quantity at Actual Rates Price Variance Direct materials 437,500 385,000 (52,500) F Ruthenium Electronics Co.Fabrication Department Quarterly Budget Performance Report Standard Quantity at Standard Rates Actual Quantity at Standard Rates Quantity Variances Direct labor 245,000 203,000 (42,000) F Direct materials 140,000 140,000 0 Total 385,000 343,000 (42,000) F You also interviewed the Assembly Department supervisor. Excerpts from the interview follow: Q: What explains the poor performance in your department? A: Listen, youve got to understand what its been like in this department recently. Lately, it seems no matter how hard we try, we cant seem to make the standards. Im not sure what is going on, but weve been having a lot of problems lately. Q: What kind of problems? A: Well, for instance, all this Quarter weve been requisitioning purchased parts from the material storeroom, and the parts just didnt fit together very well. Im not sure what is going on, but during most of this quarter, weve had to scrap and sort purchased partsjust to get our assemblies put together. Naturally, all this takes time and material. And thats not all. Q: Go on. A: All this Quarter the work we've been receiving from the Fabrication Department has been shoddy. I mean, maybe around 20% of the stuff that comes in from Fabrication just cant be assembled. The fabrication is all wrong. As a result we've had to scrap and rework a lot of the stuff. Naturally, this has just shot our quantity variances. Interpret the variance reports in light of the comments by the Assembly Department supervisor.
Variance interpretation Vanadium Audio Inc. is a small manufacturer of electronic musical Instruments. The plant manager received the following variable factory overhead report for the period: Actual units produced: 15,000 (90% of practical capacity) The plant manager is not pleased with the 12,320 unfavorable variable factory overhead controllable variance and has come to discuss the matter with the controller. The following discussion occurred; Plant Manager: I just received this factory report for the latest month of operator. I'm not very pleased with these figures. Before these numbers go to headquarters, you and I will need to reach an understanding. Controller Go ahead, what's the problem? Plant Manager: What's the problem? Well, everything. Look at the variance. Its too large. If I understand the accounting approach being used here, you are assuming that my costs are variable to the units produced. Thus, as the production volume declines, so should these costs. Well I don't believe that these costs are variable at all. I think they are fixed costs. As a result when we operate below capacity, the costs really don't go down at all. I'm being penalized for costs I have no control over at all I need this report to be redone to reflect this fact, if anything, the difference between actual and budget is essentially a volume variance. Listen. I know that you're a tear-payer. You really need to reconsider your assumptions on this one. If you were in the controllers position, how would you respond to the plant manager?
Calculating factory overhead: two variances Munoz Manufacturing Co. normally produces 10,000 units of product X each month. Each unit requires 2 hours of direct labor, and factory overhead is applied on a direct labor hour basis. Fixed costs and variable costs in factory overhead at the normal capacity are 2.50 and 1.50 per direct labor hour, respectively. Cost and production data for May follow: a. Calculate the flexible-budget variance. b. Calculate the production-volume variance. c. Was the total factory overhead under- or overapplied? By what amount?
8. The standard and actual price per pound of raw material are P4 and P4.50 respectively. A total of pounds of raw material was purchased and then used to produce 5,000 units. The quantity standard allow two (2) pounds of raw material per unit produced. What was the materials quantity variance? P5,000 favorable P2,000 favorable P5,000 unfavorable P2,000 unfavorable