When a null hypothesis is rejected, the test is said to be "statistically significant." If a researcher reports a statistically significant test at the 1% significance level, can we conclude that it would have been significant at the 5% level
When a null hypothesis is rejected, the test is said to be "statistically significant." If a researcher reports a statistically significant test at the 1% significance level, can we conclude that it would have been significant at the 5% level
Chapter9: Sequences, Probability And Counting Theory
Section9.7: Probability
Problem 1SE: What term is used to express the likelihood of an event occurring? Are there restrictions on its...
Related questions
Question
When a null hypothesis is rejected, the test is said to be "statistically significant." If a
researcher reports a statistically significant test at the 1% significance level, can we conclude
that it would have been significant at the 5% level? Clearly explain your answer.
Expert Solution
This question has been solved!
Explore an expertly crafted, step-by-step solution for a thorough understanding of key concepts.
This is a popular solution!
Trending now
This is a popular solution!
Step by step
Solved in 2 steps
Recommended textbooks for you
Glencoe Algebra 1, Student Edition, 9780079039897…
Algebra
ISBN:
9780079039897
Author:
Carter
Publisher:
McGraw Hill
College Algebra (MindTap Course List)
Algebra
ISBN:
9781305652231
Author:
R. David Gustafson, Jeff Hughes
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Glencoe Algebra 1, Student Edition, 9780079039897…
Algebra
ISBN:
9780079039897
Author:
Carter
Publisher:
McGraw Hill
College Algebra (MindTap Course List)
Algebra
ISBN:
9781305652231
Author:
R. David Gustafson, Jeff Hughes
Publisher:
Cengage Learning