Which of one the following statements is correct? A. The Cournot model is simply wrong because in the real world firms do make pricing decisions. B. Only the Bertrand model can be right because in the real world firms do make pricing decisions. C. The Cournot model can be justified as a reduced form of a dynamic game in which firms make decisions on quantities, which are followed by pricing decisions. D. The Cournot model are justified because in all real world markets there are auctioneers who play the function of clearing the markets.

Which of one the following statements is correct? A. The Cournot model is simply wrong because in the real world firms do make pricing decisions. B. Only the Bertrand model can be right because in the real world firms do make pricing decisions. C. The Cournot model can be justified as a reduced form of a dynamic game in which firms make decisions on quantities, which are followed by pricing decisions. D. The Cournot model are justified because in all real world markets there are auctioneers who play the function of clearing the markets.

Microeconomic Theory

12th Edition

ISBN:9781337517942

Author:NICHOLSON

Publisher:NICHOLSON

Chapter8: Game Theory

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 8.9P

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Which one of the following statements about the circular city model is incorrect? A. This is a 2-stage dynamic game. B. In the first stage the firms simultaneously choose their locations. C. In the first stage the firms simultaneously choose whether to enter the market. D. In the second stage the firms simultaneously choose their prices.
True or false? If a game has a Nash equilibrium, that equilibrium will be the equilibrium that we expect to observe in the real world. False. People don’t always act in the way that a Nash equilibrium requires. People don’t always make the necessary calculations and they take into account the outcome of others. False. A Nash equilibrium is based on very strict assumptions that rarely hold in the real world. No real-world situation leads to a Nash equilibrium. True. As long as people are rational and have their own self-interest at heart, real-life games will result in the Nash equilibrium. True. Nash’s theory of equilibrium outcomes was derived from real-world interactions. The theory holds true for almost all real-world scenarios.
Which one of the following statements is correct? A. The Bertrand model must be wrong because there exists a Nash equilibrium for the Cournot model. B. The Cournot model must be wrong because there exists a Nash equlibrium for the Bertrand model. C. The result which is referred to as the "Bertrand paradox" cannot be a Nash equilibrium outcome. D. The result which is referred to as the "Bertrand paradox" is nevertheless a Nash equilibrium outcome.
Which one of the following statements about the (modified) Stackleberg model is incorrect? A. Firm 1's move is a strategic move. B. Firm 2's move is a strategic move. C. It is can be solved by backward induction. D. It is a dynamic game.
For the operating system game, let us assume Windows is more superior than Mac intrinsically and that network effects are stronger for Macs. These modifications are reflected in different payoffs. Now, the payoffs from adopting Windows is 30 + 10 × w and from adopting Mac is 20 × m. n consumers are simultaneously deciding between Windows and Mac, where n > 10. (a) Is there a Nash equilibrium in which everyone buys Windows? Explain your answer. (b) Is there a Nash equilibrium in which everyone buys Mac? Explain your answer. (c) Is there a Nash equilibrium in which some consumers buy Windows and some consumers buy Mac? Explain your answer.
Consider a modified Traveler’s Dilemma. In terms of strategy options that the players have and the dollars they earn, it is like the standard Traveler’s Dilemma, but the players do not have endless appetite for money. Up to 100 dollars, each dollar feels like a dollar. But any moneybeyond 100 is psychologically like 100 dollars. Assuming that players are maximizers of ‘psychological’ dollars instead of real dollars, describe all the Nash equilibria of this modified Traveler’s Dilemma.
Two parties, Juan and Ben, have been negotiating the purchase by Ben of Juan's car. Juan receives a new and higher bid for his car from Adriana. How might Adriana's bid change Juan and Ben's threat values? The threat values are unchanged. Juan now values the car at the price of Adriana's bid, her bid is his opportunity cost of selling the car to Ben, and that opportunity cost is Juan's new threat value. Juan's new threat value is the product of the difference between Ben and Adriana's offers and the probability the car will be sold to Adriana. Juan's threat value is unchanged, but Ben has to consider his new opportunity cost
Consider the following Cournot model. The inverse demand function is given by p = 30 –Q, where Q = q1 + q2. Firm 1’s marginal cost is $6 (c1 = 6). Firm 2 uses a new technology so that its marginal cost is $3 (c2 = 3). There is no fixed cost. The two firms choose their quantities simultaneously and compete only once. (So it’s a one-shot simultaneous game.) Answer the following questions. (4points)DeriveFirm1andFirm2’sreactionfunctions, respectively. (2 points) Solve the Nash equilibrium (q1N, q2N). (2points)Whatistheequilibriumpriceandwhatistheprofitlevel for each firm? (3 points) Suppose there is a market for the technology used by Firm 2. What is the highest price that Firm 1 is willing to pay for this new technology? (3points)Nowlet’schangethesetupfromCournotcompetitionto Bertrand competition, while maintaining all other assumptions. What is the equilibrium price? (3 points) Suppose the two firms engage in Bertrand competition. What is the highest price that…
Consider the following Stackelberg model. There are two firms in the market. Firm 1 is the leader and firm 2 is the follower. Firms can decide to produce low or high. The extensive-form representation below presents the profits depending on production decisions of firms. The first value is profit of firm 1 and second value is profit of firm 2 depending on their production decisions. Solve using backward-induction. What are the optimal production levels of both firms? Describe how you found the optimal strategy using words.see the image
Imagine that two firms in two different countries want to bring a new product tomarket. Due to economies of scale, if both firms do this, they will both lose £50million. But if only one firm does this, it will gain £300 million.(a) What is the best strategy for firm A, if firm B has not yet entered the market, andwhy?(b) Illustrate this with a game theory diagram, showing appropriate payouts.(c) What is the welfare-maximising strategy for a government, and why?
Imagine that two firms in two different countries want to bring a new product to market. Due to economies of scale, if both firms do this, they will both lose £50 million. But if only one firm does this, it will gain £300 million. (a) What is the best strategy for firm A, if firm B has not yet entered the market, and why? (b) Illustrate this with a game theory diagram, showing appropriate payouts. (c) What is the welfare-maximising strategy for a government, and why?
Each actor has two possible actions: reduce greenhouse-gas emissions or increase emissions. Each player's payoffs for various combinations of actions are shown in the cells: by convention, the row player (EU)'s payoffs are shown first, and the column player (China)'s payoffs are shown second. Based on this matrix, which of the following statements are true? A.The EU is better off reducing its emissions, but only if China also reduces its emissions B. China is better off increasing its emissions, but only if the EU also increases its emissions C.Both China and the EU are better off increasing their emissions, whatever the other player does D.All of the above E.None of the above

SEE MORE QUESTIONS

Recommended textbooks for you

Microeconomic Theory

Economics

ISBN:

9781337517942

Author:

NICHOLSON

Publisher:

Cengage

Microeconomic Theory

Economics

ISBN:

9781337517942

Author:

NICHOLSON

Publisher:

Cengage

SEE MORE TEXTBOOKS

GET THE APP

About FAQ Academic Integrity Sitemap Document Sitemap

Contact Bartleby Contact Research (Essays)High School Textbooks Literature Guides Concept Explainers by Subject Essay Help Mobile App

GET THE APP

Privacy

Your CA Privacy Rights

Your NV Privacy Rights

About Ads

Manage My Data

bartleby, a Learneo, Inc. business

	A.	The Cournot model is simply wrong because in the real world firms do make pricing decisions.
	B.	Only the Bertrand model can be right because in the real world firms do make pricing decisions.
	C.	The Cournot model can be justified as a reduced form of a dynamic game in which firms make decisions on quantities, which are followed by pricing decisions.
	D.	The Cournot model are justified because in all real world markets there are auctioneers who play the function of clearing the markets.