a) For each bargaining game S a solution concept o selects an alternative ø(S) E S. If the solution concept selects alternative p(S) = (@(S), P2(S)), then player 1 receives utility o,(S) and player 2 receives utility o,(S). Suppose that a solution concept o satisfies "Property A": Property A: For bargaining games, S and T, if SCT then o,(S) < 9¡(T) and P2(S) < P2(T) Discuss Property A and prove / disprove if the Nash solution satisfies this property.

a) For each bargaining game S a solution concept o selects an alternative ø(S) E S. If the solution concept selects alternative p(S) = (@(S), P2(S)), then player 1 receives utility o,(S) and player 2 receives utility o,(S). Suppose that a solution concept o satisfies "Property A": Property A: For bargaining games, S and T, if SCT then o,(S) < 9¡(T) and P2(S) < P2(T) Discuss Property A and prove / disprove if the Nash solution satisfies this property.

Microeconomic Theory

12th Edition

ISBN:9781337517942

Author:NICHOLSON

Publisher:NICHOLSON

Chapter8: Game Theory

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 8.7P

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Consider the game of Chicken in which each player has the option to “get out of the way” and “hang tough” with payoffs: Get out of the way Hang tough Get out of the way 2,2 1,3 Hang tough 3,1 00 a. Find all pure strategy Nash equilibria, if they exist b. Let k be the probability that player 1 chooses “hang tough” and u be the probability that player two chooses “hang tough.” Find the mixed stragety Nash equilibria, if they exist
Which of the following is FALSE for the grim trigger strategy and the infinite horizon repeated Prisoner's Dilemma game illustrated above? A. In the grim trigger strategy profile, if a player chooses D in a period, then both players chooses D forever after that period B. The threshold discount factor for sustaining cooperation under grim trigger strategy depends on the utility numbers in the stage game C. If all utility numbers remain the same but 3 is replaced by 5 in the stage game, then cooperation CANNOT be sustained in this game for all possible values of the discount factor.
Given the stage game above/below. Suppose that the players play (C,C) in period t = 1; 3; 5; ::: and plays (D,D) in period t = 2; 4; 6; ::. Compute the discounted payoff of each player.
Consider a Common Value auction with two bidders who both receive a signal X that is uniformly distributed between 0 and 1. The (common) value V of the good the players are bidding for is the average of the two signals, i.e. V = (X1+X2)/2. Compute the symmetric Nash equilibrium bidding strategy for the second-price sealed-bid auction assuming that players are risk-neutral and have standard selfish preferences. Furthermore, you may assume that the other bidder is following a linear bidding strategy. Make sure to explain your notation and the steps you take to derive the result.
Players 1, 2, and 3 are playing a game in which the strategy of player i isdenoted yi and can be any nonnegative real number. The payoff function for player 1 is V1(y1,y2,y3) = y1 + y1y2 - (y1)2,for player 2 is V2(y1,y2,y3) = y2 + y1y2 - (y2)2,and for player 3 is V3(y1,y2,y3) = (10 - y1 - y2 - y3)y3.These payoff functions are hill shaped. Find a Nash equilibrium. (Hint: Thepayoff functions are symmetric for players 1 and 2.)
The count is three balls and two strikes, and the bases are empty. The batter wants to maximize the probability of getting a hit or a walk, while the pitcher wants to minimize this probability. The pitcher has to decide whether to throw a fast ball or a curve ball, while the batter has to decide whether to prepare for a fast ball or a curve ball. The strategic form of this game is shown here. Find all Nash equilibria in mixed strategies.
Using the payoff matrix, suppose this game is infinitely repeated and that the interest rate is sufficiently “low.” Identify trigger strategies that permit players 1 and 2 to earn equilibrium payoffs of 140 and 180, respectively, in each period
A strategy is a decision rule that describes the actions a player will take at each decision point. The normal-form game indicates the players in the game, the possible strategies of the players, and the payoffs to the players that will result from alternative strategies. In the game presented in Table Normal-Form Game, does player B have a dominant strategy? What is the secure strategy for player B in the game presented in Table Normal-Form Game?
Q56 A Nash equilibrium is an outcome... a. Achieved by cooperation between players in the game. b. That is achieved by collusion where no party has an incentive to change their behaviour. c. Where each player's strategy depends on the behaviour of its opponents. d. That is achieved when players in the game have jointly maximized profits and divided those profits according to market share of each player. e. Where each player's best strategy is to maintain its present behaviour given the present behaviour of the other players.
Consider the following voting game. There are three players, 1, 2 and 3. And there are three alternatives: A, B and C. Players vote simultaneously for an alternative. Abstaining is not allowed. Thus, the strategy space for each player is {A, B, C}. The alternative with the most votes wins. If no alternative receives a majority, then alternative A is selected. Denote ui(d) the utility obtained by player i if alternave d {A, B, C} is selected. The payoff functions are, u1 (A) = u2 (B) = u3 (C) = 2 u1 (B) = u2 (C) = u3 (A) = 1 u1 (C) = u2 (A) = u3 (B) = 0 a. Let us denote by (i, j, k) a profile of pure strategies where player 1’s strategy is (to vote for) i, player 2’s strategy is j and player 3’s strategy is k. Show that the pure strategy profiles (A,A,A) and (A,B,A) are both Nash equilibria. b. Is (A,A,B) a Nash equilibrium? Comment.
See the extensive form game image attached. 1) Solve the game by backward induction 2) Find all the pure-strategy Nash equilibria (in complete contingent plans)of the extensive-form game (no need to write down thenormal-form representation)
Suppose that 5 risk neutral competitors participate in a rent seeking game with a fixed prize of $100. Each player may invest as much as he wishes in the political contest, although those investments have an opportunity cost equal 1. The probability of winning is directly proportional to the candidate’s share of the total rent-seeking investment. What is the profit-maximizing investment by player 1 as a function of the investment by all the others? What is a Nash equilibrium investment by each player in a symmetric game?