Subject; accounts Exercise 21-1 (Algo) Management by exception LO C1Resset Company had the following results for April's operations: Findicates favorable and U Indicates unfavorable. In applyingmanagement by exception, the company Investigates all variances of $400 or more.Direct materials price varianceDirect materials quantity varianceDirect labor rate varianceWhich variances will the company Investigate?Itema. Direct materials price varianceb. Direct materials quantity variancec. Direct labor rate varianced. Direct labor efficiency variancee. Overhead controllable variancef. Overhead volume varianceCost$ 1,100 F300 U250 UDirect labor efficiency varianceOverhead controllable varianceOverhead volume variance$ 600 F400 U750 F

Name: Subject; accounts Exercise 21-1 (Algo) Management by exception LO C1Re
Uploaded: 2024-03-20T06:33:06.000Z
Channel: Bartleby
Description: Subject; accounts Exercise 21-1 (Algo) Management by exception LO C1Resset Company had the following results for April's operations: Findicates favorable and U Indicates unfavorable. In applyingmanagement by exception, the company Investigates all va

Variance arises when the actual costs for the company is different from the standard costs which…

Business

Accounting

Which variances will the company Investigate? Item a. Direct materials price variance b. Direct materials quantity variance c. Direct labor rate variance d. Direct labor efficiency variance e. Overhead controllable variance f. Overhead volume variance Cost

Which variances will the company Investigate? Item a. Direct materials price variance b. Direct materials quantity variance c. Direct labor rate variance d. Direct labor efficiency variance e. Overhead controllable variance f. Overhead volume variance Cost

Survey of Accounting (Accounting I)

8th Edition

ISBN:9781305961883

Author:Carl Warren

Publisher:Carl Warren

Chapter13: Budgeting And Standard Costs

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 13.5P: Direct materials and direct labor, variance analysis; factory overhead cost variance analysis Route...

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Refer to the data in Exercise 9.15. Required: 1. Compute overhead variances using a two-variance analysis. 2. Compute overhead variances using a three-variance analysis. 3. Illustrate how the two- and three-variance analyses are related to the four-variance analysis. Oerstman, Inc., uses a standard costing system and develops its overhead rates from the current annual budget. The budget is based on an expected annual output of 120,000 units requiring 480,000 direct labor hours. (Practical capacity is 500,000 hours.) Annual budgeted overhead costs total 787,200, of which 556,800 is fixed overhead. A total of 119,400 units using 478,000 direct labor hours were produced during the year. Actual variable overhead costs for the year were 230,600, and actual fixed overhead costs were 556,250. Required: 1. Compute the fixed overhead spending and volume variances. How would you interpret the spending variance? Discuss the possible interpretations of the volume variance. Which is most appropriate for this example? 2. Compute the variable overhead spending and efficiency variances. How is the variable overhead spending variance like the price variances of direct labor and direct materials? How is it different? How is the variable overhead efficiency variance related to the direct labor efficiency variance?
Using variance analysis and interpretation Last year, Endicott Corp. adopted a standard cost system. Labor standards were set on the basis of time studies and prevailing wage rates. Materials standards were determined from materials specifications and the prices then in effect. On June 30, the end of the current fiscal year, a partial trial balance revealed the following: Standards set at the beginning of the year have remained unchanged. All inventories are priced at standard cost. What conclusions can be drawn from each of the four variances shown in Endicotts trial balance?
(Appendix 10A) Which of the following is true concerning labor variances that are not material in amount? a. They are closed to Cost of Goods Sold. b. They are prorated among Work in Process, Finished Goods, and Cost of Goods Sold. c. They are prorated among Materials, Work in Process, Finished Goods, and Cost of Goods Sold. d. They are reported on the balance sheet at the end of the year. e. All of these.
Variance interpretation You have been asked to investigate some cost problems in the Assembly Department of Ruthenium Electronics Co., a consumer electronics company. To begin your investigation, you have obtained the following budget performance report for department for the last quarter: The following reports were also obtained: You also interviewed the Assembly Department supervisor. Excerpts from the interview follow: Q: What explains the poor performance in your department? A: Listen, you've got to understand what it's been like in this department recently. Lately, it seems no matter how hard we try, we can't seem to make the standards. I'm not sure what is going on, but we've been having a lot of problems lately. Q: What kind of problems? A: Well, for instance, all this quarter we've been requisitioning purchased parts from the material storeroom, and the pans just didn't fit together very well I'm not sure what is going on. but during most of this quarter we've had to scrap and sort purchased pansjust to get our assemblies put together. Naturally, all this takes time and material. And that's not all. Q: Go on. A: All this quarter, the work that we've been receiving from the Fabrication Department has been shoddy. I mean, maybe around 20% of the stuff that comes in from Fabrication just can't be assembled. The fabrication is all wrong. As a result, we've had to scrap and rework a lot of the stuff. Naturally, this has just shot our quantity variances. Interpret the variance reports in light of the comments by the Assembly Department supervisor.
Variances Refer to Cornerstone Exercise 9.6. Required: 1. Calculate the variable overhead spending variance using the formula approach. (If you compute the actual variable overhead rate, carry your computations out to five significant digits and round the variance to the nearest dollar.) 2. Calculate the variable overhead efficiency variance using the formula approach. 3. Calculate the variable overhead spending variance and variable overhead efficiency variance using the three-pronged graphical approach. 4. What if 26,100 direct labor hours were actually worked in February? What impact would that have had on the variable overhead spending variance? On the variable overhead efficiency variance? Standish Company manufactures consumer products and provided the following information for the month of February: Required: 1. Calculate the fixed overhead spending variance using the formula approach. 2. Calculate the volume variance using the formula approach. 3. Calculate the fixed overhead spending variance and volume variance using the three-pronged graphical approach. 4. What if 129,600 units had actually been produced in February? What impact would that have had on the fixed overhead spending variance? On the volume variance?
(Appendix) Calculating factory overhead: three variances Using the data given in E8-17, calculate the following overhead variances: a. Spending variance. b. Production-volume variance. c. Efficiency variance. d. Was the factory overhead under- or overapplied? By what amount? In all problems involving variances, use F and U to indicate favorable and unfavorable variances, respectively.
Madison Company uses the following rule to determine whether direct labor efficiency variances ought to be investigated. A direct labor efficiency variance will be investigated anytime the amount exceeds the lesser of 12,000 or 10 percent of the standard labor cost. Reports for the past five weeks provided the following information: Required: 1. Using the rule provided, identify the cases that will be investigated. 2. Suppose that investigation reveals that the cause of an unfavorable direct labor efficiency variance is the use of lower quality direct materials than are usually used. Who is responsible? What corrective action would likely be taken? 3. Suppose that investigation reveals that the cause of a significant favorable direct labor efficiency variance is attributable to a new approach to manufacturing that takes less labor time but causes more direct materials waste. Upon examining the direct materials usage variance, it is discovered to be unfavorable, and it is larger than the favorable direct labor efficiency variance. Who is responsible? What action should be taken? How would your answer change if the unfavorable variance were smaller than the favorable?
Direct materials and direct labor, variance analysis; factory overhead cost variance analysis Route 66 Tire Co. manufactures automobile tires. Standard costs and actual costs for direct materials, direct labor, and factory overhead incurred for the manufacture of 10.000 tires were as follows: Instructions Determine (a) the price variance, quantity variance, and total direct materials cost variance; (b) the rale variance, time variance, and total direct labor cost variance; and (c) Appendix: variable factory overhead controllable variance, the fixed factory overhead volume variance, and total factory overhead cost variance.
Sommers Company uses the following rule to determine whether materials usage variances should be investigated: A materials usage variance will be investigated anytime the amount exceeds the lesser of 12,000 or 10% of the standard cost. Reports for the past 5 weeks provided the following information: Required: 1. Using the rule provided, identify the cases that will be investigated. 2. CONCEPTUAL CONNECTION Suppose investigation reveals that the cause of an unfavorable materials usage variance is the use of lower-quality materials than are normally used. Who is responsible? What corrective action would likely be taken? 3. CONCEPTUAL CONNECTION Suppose investigation reveals that the cause of a significant unfavorable materials usage variance is attributable to a new approach to manufacturing that takes less labor time but causes more material waste. Examination of the labor efficiency variance reveals that it is favorable and larger than the unfavorable materials usage variance. Who is responsible? What action should be taken?
Marten Company has a cost-benefit policy to investigate any variance that is greater than 1,000 or 10% of budget, whichever is larger. Actual results for the previous month indicate the following: The company should investigate: a. neither the materials variance nor the labor variance. b. the materials variance only. c. the labor variance only. d. both the materials variance and the labor variance.
Recompute the variances from the second Acme Inc. exercise using $0.0725 as the standard cost of the material and $14 as the standard labor cost per hour. How has your explanation of the variances changed?