Chapter 12.5, Problem 5.2CQ

Does the coverage of the Statute of Frauds make sense as it currently stands? Would it be better to expand the law and require that all contracts be in writing? Or should the law be done away with altogether?

May an action arising from fraud be waived? explain

which of the following is true? a.When what is to be delivered is a generic thing, the creditor may ask a person other than the debtor to perform the obligation. b.Dolo incidente relates to the fraud committed at the time of the perfection of a contract. c.When negligence is imputed as a cause for the breach in an obligation, the same is presumed.