Person ME was a 17-year-old competitor in a horseback riding competition. Person KN was his coach. Person ME signed an agreement with person KN releasing him from all liability except damages caused by negligence. During an event, ME struck a hurdle and fell down from the horse and died. The parents of ME filed suit against KN for wrongful death. To find: The limitation to which the liability clause of the contract is enforced in the case filed by the parents of person ME.

Question

Answer the question: Ahmed is an employee of Bristol Manufacturing Company. Bristol manufactures plastics, which creates large amounts of toxic waste that must then be disposed of. Ahmed is responsible for making sure this toxic waste is properly disposed of. To cut costs, Ahmed decides to divert the liquid waste into a local stream, instead of properly disposing of it. This is a direct violation of the Clean Water Act, a national law that protects the United States’ waterways. Sanford is the director of the division in which Ahmed works and knows that Ahmed is doing this. When the authorities discover Ahmed’s unlawful actions, can Bristol be held criminally liable? a) Bristol cannot be held criminally liable, even if Sanford knew of Ahmed’s actions. b)Bristol can be held criminally responsible if Sanford knew of Ahmed’s criminal actions.

Answer 1

Question

Chapter 13, Problem 3BCP

Summary Introduction

Case summary: Person ME was a 17-year-old competitor in a horseback riding competition. Person KN was his coach. Person ME signed an agreement with person KN releasing him from all liability except damages caused by negligence. During an event, ME struck a hurdle and fell down from the horse and died. The parents of ME filed suit against KN for wrongful death.

To find: The limitation to which the liability clause of the contract is enforced in the case filed by the parents of person ME.

Expert Solution & Answer

Trending nowThis is a popular solution!

See solution

Check out sample textbook solution

Students have asked these similar questions

Answer the question: Ahmed is an employee of Bristol Manufacturing Company. Bristol manufactures plastics, which creates large amounts of toxic waste that must then be disposed of. Ahmed is responsible for making sure this toxic waste is properly disposed of. To cut costs, Ahmed decides to divert the liquid waste into a local stream, instead of properly disposing of it. This is a direct violation of the Clean Water Act, a national law that protects the United States’ waterways. Sanford is the director of the division in which Ahmed works and knows that Ahmed is doing this. When the authorities discover Ahmed’s unlawful actions, can Bristol be held criminally liable? a) Bristol cannot be held criminally liable, even if Sanford knew of Ahmed’s actions. b)Bristol can be held criminally responsible if Sanford knew of Ahmed’s criminal actions.

Stephen Glass made himself infamous as a dishonest journalist by fabricating material for more than forty articles for The New Republic and other publications. At the time, he was a law student at Georgetown University. Once suspicions were aroused, Glass tried to avoid detection. Later, Glass applied for admission to the California bar. The California Supreme Court denied his application, citing “numerous instances of dishonesty” during his “rehabilitation” following the exposure of his misdeeds. How do these circumstances underscore the importance of ethics?

Paula Plaintiff owns Paula’s Boutique, one of the most popular stores in town. William Wicked owns the store next to Paula’s Boutique. William has been jealous of Paula’s success. William, in an effort to increase his own business, begins to tell his customers that Paula is dishonest and unethical. William even puts a sign in his front window warning potential customers not to shop at Paula’s Boutique because of her deceitful and unethical practices. Paula is upset when she finds out what William has been doing. Paula has always been honest and ethical with her customers and now her business is suffering because of William’s dishonesty. Paula decides that something must be done about this situation. What advice would you give Paula? Discuss the possible tort claim Paula might have against William. Be sure to include the elements of the tort and relate those elements to the scenario. If Paula decides to pursue a claim against William, should she consider a lawsuit, mediation, or…