Case summary : The company LI sells the only style of catridge which works with the company’s printer. The other companies acquired the used cartridges and refurbished them to sell them in competition with LI. The company offered a twenty percent discount to customers if they returned the used cartridges of the company. The company SSC was involved in making and selling of the remanufactured cartridges. LI released an advertisement to claim that the products sold by the company are violating the patent rights of LI. A legal suit was filed by LI in federal district court for violation of the intellectual property right. The company SSC countered the claim by alleging that the company LI did false advertisement. The counterclaim was dismissed and the court ordered that company SSC had no right to sue the company LI. Company SSC appealed to the appellate court. The appellate court reversed the decision. The company LI appealed to the supreme court and won.
To find: Whether SSC is entitled to relief under the court’s ruling.
Want to see the full answer?
Check out a sample textbook solutionChapter 24 Solutions
The Legal Environment of Business: Text and Cases (MindTap Course List)
- A Question of Ethics—Copyright Infringement.Custom Copies, Inc., prepares and sells coursepacks,which contain compilations of readings for collegecourses. A teacher selects the readings and delivers asyllabus to the copy shop, which obtains the materialsfrom a library, copies them, and binds the copies. Blackwell Publishing, Inc., which owns the copyright to some of the materials,filed a suit, alleging copyright infringement. Custom Copies fileda motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim. [ Blackwell Publishing, Inc. v. Custom Copies, Inc., 2006 WL 1529503(N.D.Fla. 2006)] (See Copyrights.)(a) Custom Copies argued, in part, that creating and sellingdid not “distribute” the coursepacks. Does a copy shopviolate copyright law if it only copies materials for coursepacks? Does the copying fall under the “fair use” exception? Should the court grant the defendant’s motion?Why or why not?(b) What is the potential impact of copying and selling a bookor journal without the permission of, and…arrow_forwardTrevor Rowe a well known businessman saw an article in the gleaner that indicated that he was a jail bird. As a result, he lost customers. He wrote to the gleaner, seeking a retraction of the story, and found out that there was in fact another man in the community with the same name who had gone to jail. What is the position of either party? The Gleaner can prevent litigation by offering to make amends. The Gleaner doesn’t have to retract the story as it was true for one of the men. There is no action as the story was already published. The businessman can go straight to Court. There is no action at there are two persons with the same name.arrow_forwardIn your role working as a paralegal or legal assistant for eHarbour, draft a memorandum to Daniel Hudson, the eHarbour general counsel, on how best to protect eHarbour’s intellectual property. Specifically, discuss the steps and benefits of safeguarding eHarbour’s intellectual property through: (1) registration of proprietary software developed by eHarbour with the U.S. Copyright Office; (2) applying for a registered trademark for the eHarbour name with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office; and (3) protecting trade secrets with password protection and software encryption. (Please include introduction, conclusion and references)arrow_forward
- Define the Parol Evidence Rule. What does the “four corners” directive state? What exceptions, if any, does the rule allow?arrow_forward1a. What are the general principles of consumer protection? 1b. Discuss the nature of and parties in a consumer protection suit. Who can bring a suit and why? 1c. Who is held accountable under the consumer protection laws?arrow_forwardA corporate resolution is a written document created by the board of directors of a company detailing a binding corporate action. Discuss briefly the types of resolutions recognized by the Companies Act, 2017 with an example of each.arrow_forward
- 3. Privacy as a legal team is best described by which definition? a. Right of an individual to limit disclosure of personal information. b. Protection of health information in a patient-provider relationship c. Physical and electronic protection of health information d. Prevents the stealing of electronically stored informationarrow_forwardThe term "privacy" does not appear anywhere in the Constitution of the United States. Discuss (meaning share your opinion and support it with anecdotes or evidence) whether or not the Supreme Court was correct in "finding" privacy in the Constitution.arrow_forwardCasey is on trial under criminal allegations that she engaged in fraudulent behavior at the company she manages. She is worried when the plaintiff alleges that it has "unambiguous proof" that Casey is guilty. Which of the following is most likely true? If the plaintiff provides proof only up to the level of "clear and convincing," Casey can still be acquitted. Casey need not worry about the plaintiff's evidence, since parties tend to boast about the level of proof they can establish anyway. If the plaintiff meets a "clear and convincing" burden of proof, Casey will be found guilty. The plaintiff will most likely prove Casey is guilty, since criminal charges only need to meet a prima facie burden of proof.arrow_forward
- BUSN 11 Introduction to Business Student EditionBusinessISBN:9781337407137Author:KellyPublisher:Cengage LearningEssentials of Business Communication (MindTap Cou...BusinessISBN:9781337386494Author:Mary Ellen Guffey, Dana LoewyPublisher:Cengage LearningAccounting Information Systems (14th Edition)BusinessISBN:9780134474021Author:Marshall B. Romney, Paul J. SteinbartPublisher:PEARSON
- International Business: Competing in the Global M...BusinessISBN:9781259929441Author:Charles W. L. Hill Dr, G. Tomas M. HultPublisher:McGraw-Hill Education