A company, M is a corporation of home-building that builds retirement communities. The company, M purchased farmlands in the area where a company, F owns feedlots. The company, M started building and selling homes. Both began expanding their businesses. The Odor and flies from feedlots started hampering the business of the company, M. The company, M filed a suit to enjoin feedlots. To explain: The common law theory under which the suit can be filed by company M.

Question

Penny is seen organizing racks at a local clothing store one day while she shops, and the manager offers her a job. The next day, Penny’s boss from the clothing store across the street comes in and accuses the manager of trying to interfere with Penny’s non-competition agreement. Which of the following is true? The manager has done nothing wrong because non-competition agreements are never used in clothing retail. The manager is guilty of interference with a business relationship. The manager has interfered with a contractual relationship and will be liable for interfering with a contractual relationship. The manager has done nothing wrong because she did not know about the non-competition agreement.

Answer 1

Question

Chapter 25, Problem 2BS

Summary Introduction

Case summary:A company, M is a corporation of home-building that builds retirement communities. The company, M purchased farmlands in the area where a company, F owns feedlots. The company, M started building and selling homes. Both began expanding their businesses. The Odor and flies from feedlots started hampering the business of the company, M. The company, M filed a suit to enjoin feedlots.

To explain: The common law theory under which the suit can be filed by company M.

Summary Introduction

Case summary: A company, M is a corporation of home-building that builds retirement communities. The company, M purchased farmlands in the area where a company, F owns feedlots. The company, M started building and selling homes. Both began expanding their businesses. The Odor and flies from feedlots started hampering the business of the company M. The company, M filed a suit to enjoin feedlots.

To find:The violation of any federal environmental laws by company F.

Expert Solution & Answer

Trending nowThis is a popular solution!

See solution

Check out sample textbook solution

Students have asked these similar questions

Penny is seen organizing racks at a local clothing store one day while she shops, and the manager offers her a job. The next day, Penny’s boss from the clothing store across the street comes in and accuses the manager of trying to interfere with Penny’s non-competition agreement. Which of the following is true? The manager has done nothing wrong because non-competition agreements are never used in clothing retail. The manager is guilty of interference with a business relationship. The manager has interfered with a contractual relationship and will be liable for interfering with a contractual relationship. The manager has done nothing wrong because she did not know about the non-competition agreement.

Whistle-Blowing and the Environment Katherine works as a clerk for Bio Chemist Services, a small toxic-waste disposal company.The company has a contract to dispose of medical waste from a local hospital. During thecourse of her work, Katherine comes across documents that suggest Bio Chemist has actuallybeen disposing of some of this medical waste in a local municipal landfill. Katherine isshocked. She knows this practice is illegal. And even though only a small portion of the medicalwaste that Bio Chemist handles is disposed of this way, any amount at all seems a worrisomethreat to public health.Katherine gathers the appropriate documents and takes them to her immediate superior, David.David says, “Look, I don't think that sort of thing is your concern, or mine. We're in charge ofrecord keeping, not making decisions about where this stuff gets dumped. I suggest you dropit.” The next day, Katherine decides to go one step further and talk to Sophia Anne, thecompany's operations manager.…

The accidental baker Mamello Morongwe, a certified food technologist was working on a biscuit recipe for her employer, a leading biscuit manufacturer, when she discovered a muffin recipe. The employer expressed no interest in pursuing this segment of the market and gave Mamello the clearance to use the recipe in her private capacity for personal benefit, as part of their employee development program. After utilising this recipe to bake muffins for special events only, which she distributed over weekends, Mamello finally resigned from her job and is now pursuing her business on a full-time basis – her former employer is now a customer and has placed a full-year weekly order for 20 dozens of muffins every Friday. Armed with a business plan and registration documents for her business, Muffin Boffin, Mamello feels ready to take the country by storm. “Effective negotiators recognise that very few negotiations are conducted in a purely win-win or win-lose context. Moving towards win-win…