Person ML told person M and PK regarding a trading program that will help in purchase and sell securities. ML informed that the securities were insured as well as controlled and monitored by the Federal Reserve. Person M and PK without confirming the existence of program start to sell interest in the program to investors. The investors were assured an extraordinary rate of return from 10 percent to 100 percent for the investment of $ 1 million without any risk. The investors were told that the banks will be utilized to ensure the full bank integrity of the transaction. The transaction was made in harmony with the international banking protocol and rules which guaranteed maximum security to the capital placement of the funder. The program raised $ 23million from twenty-two investors. The investors were not receiving any gain and the amount was used for personal spending. To explain: The requirement to establish the violation of SEC rules.

Question

Want to see the full answer?

Answer 1

Question

Chapter 28, Problem 9BCP

(a)

Summary Introduction

Case summary:Person ML told person M and PK regarding a trading program that will help in purchase and sell securities. ML informed that the securities were insured as well as controlled and monitored by the Federal Reserve. Person M and PK without confirming the existence of program start to sell interest in the program to investors. The investors were assured an extraordinary rate of return from 10 percent to 100 percent for the investment of $1 million without any risk. The investors were told that the banks will be utilized to ensure the full bank integrity of the transaction. The transaction was made in harmony with the international banking protocol and rules which guaranteed maximum security to the capital placement of the funder. The program raised $ 23million from twenty-two investors. The investors were not receiving any gain and the amount was used for personal spending.

To explain: The requirement to establish the violation of SEC rules.

(b)

Summary Introduction

Case summary:Person ML told person M and PK regarding a trading program that will help in purchase and sell securities. ML informed that the securities were insured as well as controlled and monitored by the Federal Reserve. Person M and PK without confirming the existence of program start to sell interest in the program to investors. The investors were assured an extraordinary rate of return from 10 percent to 100 percent for the investment of $1 million without any risk. The investors were told that the banks will be utilized to ensure the full bank integrity of the transaction. The transaction was made in harmony with the international banking protocol and rules which guaranteed maximum security to the capital placement of the funder. The program raised $ 23million from twenty-two investors. The investors were not receiving any gain and the amount was used for personal spending.

To explain:The responsibility of investors for the loss.

Expert Solution & Answer

Want to see the full answer?

Check out a sample textbook solution

See solution

Students have asked these similar questions

1. Should George have accepted the listing? George states, “I am not discriminating. The owners are the guilty party.” Can george filter potential buyers by credit score? By race? 2. Now that George has accepted the listing, could he be guilty of fair housing violations by association? Could he be innocent because he is only “following orders”?

Russell R. Wasendorf, Sr., age 64, from Cedar Falls, Iowa, who stole more than $215,000,000 in customer funds from his commodity futures business, was sentenced today to 50 years in federal prison. Wasendorf received the prison term after a September 17, 2012 guilty plea to one count each of: mail fraud embezzlement of customer funds by a person registered under the Commodity Exchange Act making false statements to the Commodity Futures Trading Commission making false statements to a futures association registered under the Commodity Exchange Act Wasendorf was the owner and former chief executive officer of the now-bankrupt Peregrine Financial Group Inc. (PFG), a futures commission merchant headquartered in Cedar Falls, Iowa. In a plea agreement, Wasendorf admitted that, from about the early 1990s through about July of 2012, he stole millions of dollars from PFG’s customers. Wasendorf admitted he stole the funds, at least in part, by withdrawing money secretly from a customer…

Zuhair, section associate in Almadar company has found the fraud done by one of his colleagues in his section. In this situation, which of the following option is appropriated initial action of Mr. Zuhair to do if he does whistleblowing? a. Discuss the issue with the family as they may be affected b. Leave the company c. Approach immediate manager and make the manager aware of the issue d. Go outside the company and discuss with the media