Business Its Legal Ethical & Global Environment
10th Edition
ISBN: 9781305224414
Author: JENNINGS
Publisher: Cengage
expand_more
expand_more
format_list_bulleted
Concept explainers
Question
error_outline
This textbook solution is under construction.
Students have asked these similar questions
SkiCo, a Maine corporation, operates a branch in Peru selling equipment to persons planning to ski in the Andes mountain range. Peru levies an income tax on Peruvian companies equal to 25 percent of net income, with respect to foreign corporations such as SkiCo that operate in Peru, the government does not impose an income tax, but does impose a "foreign-company sales tax" equal to eight percent of the foreign corporation's Peruvian sales revenue. During the year, SkiCo's branch has sales of $200,000, expenses of $150,000 and pays a foreign-company sales tax of $16,000. If SkiCo were a Peruvian company, it would have paid Peruvian income tax of $12,500.
(a) Is the foreign company sales tax creditable under §901 or §903?
(b) Assume that SkiCo is required to pay both the $16,000 foreign-company sales tax and $12,500 Peruvian income tax on its branch operations. Is either type of Peruvian tax creditable under §901 or §903?
Read each case and specify which standard was violated
1.Aziza works for a multinational investment adviser based in the USA, she has US citizenship since 2020. She lives and works as a registered investment adviser in the tiny, but wealthy, island nation. The securities laws state that no investment adviser registered and working in that country can participate in initial public offerings (IPOs) for the adviser’s personal account. Aziza, believing that as an American citizen working for a U.S.-based company she should comply only with U.S. law, has ignored this Karrambian law. In addition, Aziza believes that, as a charter holder, as long as she adheres to the Code and Standards requirement that she disclose her participation in any IPO to her employer and clients when such ownership creates a conflict of interest, she is meeting the highest ethical requirements.
Spartan Corporation, a U.S. corporation, reported $6.2 million of pretax income from its business operations in Spartania, which were conducted through a foreign branch. Spartania taxes branch income at 15 percent, and the United States taxes corporate income at 21 percent.
Required:
a. If the United States provided no mechanism for mitigating double taxation, what would be the total tax (U.S. and foreign) on the $6.2 million of branch profits?
b. Assume the United States allows U.S. corporations to exclude foreign source income from U.S. taxation. What would be the total tax on the $6.2 million of branch profits?
c. Assume the United States allows U.S. corporations to claim a deduction for foreign income taxes. What would be the total tax on the $6.2 million of branch profits?
d-1. Assume the United States allows U.S. corporations to claim a credit for foreign income taxes paid on foreign source income. What would be the total tax on the $6.2 million of branch profits?
d-2. Assume the…
Knowledge Booster
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, accounting and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.Similar questions
- Ryu and Jin Corporation is a foreign corporation which is not engaged in trade or business in the Philippines. In, 2023 it had gross income of PHP 1,500,000 and expenses of PHP 650,000 on its isolated transaction in the Philippines The income tax due is PHP 375,000 PHP 212,500 PHP 300,000 PHP 450,000arrow_forwardAOL, LLC, mistakenly made public the personal information of 650,000 of its members. The members filed a suit in California, alleging violations of federal law and California state law. The member agreement between AOL and its members included a provision declaring Virginia as the location of any court dispute. AOL asked the court to dismiss the suit on the basis of that "forum-selection" clause in its member agreement. Under a previous decision of the United States Supreme Court, a forum-selection clause is unenforceable "if enforcement would contravene a strong public policy of the forum in which suit is brought." California courts previously have declared in other cases that clauses similar to the AOL clause contravene a strong public policy. If the court applies the doctrine of stare decisis, will it dismiss the suit? Explain. [Doe 1 v. AOL LLC, 552 F.3d 1077 (9th Cir. 2009)] (See The Common Law Tradition.)arrow_forward2. Liang Corporation, a U.S. entity, owns 100% of ForCo, a non-U.S. corporation not engaged in a U.S. trade or business. Is Liang subject to any U.S. income tax on her dealings with ForCo? Explain.arrow_forward
- Which of the following will disqualify a corporation from electing Subchapter S status? All shareholders are U.S. citizens except for 10% who are resident aliens. The election form is signed by 80% of the shareholders. The corporation has one class of stock. The corporation has 80 shareholderarrow_forwardThe following persons are your clients: Who is allowed to claim deduction? - Nicanor, an employee of ABC Corp. - ABC Corp, a foreign corporation doing business in the Philippines - XYZ Corp. a foreign corporation based in Europe - Inday Manoban, a Thai-Korean and member of the PinkBlack K-Pop Group based in Korea a. Nicanorb. ABC Corpc. XYZ Corpd. Indayarrow_forwardABC Corporation, a private corporation engaged in the business of importing used cars from Japan was issued a certificate of incorporation by virtue of R.A. 27890. Because of a failed business transaction, ABC Corporation sued Mr. X for a damage arising from the latter’s alleged breach of its contractual obligations. Mr. X cannot allege “lack of legal capacity to sue” of ABC Corporation in its motion to dismiss because it has a legal personality conferred by law. Mr. X cannot allege “lack of legal capacity” in its motion to dismiss because it is not allowed to attack the existence of the corporation collaterally. ABC Corporation is a de jure corporation and its existence can be attacked only through a quo warranto proceeding. Attacking the existence of ABC Corporation may be done through a motion to dismiss because its creation is voidarrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
- Business Its Legal Ethical & Global EnvironmentAccountingISBN:9781305224414Author:JENNINGSPublisher:Cengage
Business Its Legal Ethical & Global Environment
Accounting
ISBN:9781305224414
Author:JENNINGS
Publisher:Cengage