European Court of Justice

The European Court of Justice is the main governing body for the EU and enforcer of the laws over all of its member states. The functions of the European Court of Justice is to enforce Community law, to tackle disputes between member states and the European council and between the member states themselves, and also to protect the rights of all European individuals. The court consists of three courts, Court of Justice of the EU, General court and the EU civil service tribunal which are all located

Since its inception, the European Union has undergone substantial integration in the fields of politics, economics, and culture. Through the ratification of treaties, the European Commission, the European Council, and the European Parliament have entertained a certain degree of influence and power over legislation and the affairs of the European Union. Not much is said about the European Court of Justice; however, over the years, the European Court of Justice has gained significant policy influence

explains the role of the European Court of Justice? The European Court of Justice (ECJ), first created by the European Coal and Steel Community in 1951 is situated in Luxembourg. The court’s main objectives were the interpretation and the consistent and uniform application of the treaty across all Member States. With the exception of the Maastricht Treaty (1992) the ECJ has gained influence through the different treaties over time. The ECJ unlike any other international justice system is able to cooperate

this assignment on the European Court of Justice (ECJ), looking into its role in the European integration process, and how its rulings and judgments have affected the business framework. We will also be looking into the effects of its rulings on state sovereignty, and how in some cases its rulings have limited states power over certain policy areas and handed them to the European Union. We will start by looking at the radical jurisprudence of the European court of justice, and what political reactions

When the European Court of Justice (ECJ) was created in 1952 as a provision of the Treaty of Paris, no one could have imagined from such humble beginnings that the ECJ would become the institution that it is today. Today, the conflict between a semi-autonomous judiciary capable of conveying uniquely European rights on citizens able to be defended before a supranational court, and European governments, remains one of the clearest examples of the unintended consequences of an economic union that has

This essay will focus on the institutions in European Union. In the first, second and third section ,It provides details about the roles and compositions of the Council of Ministers , the European Commission , the European Court of Justice (ECJ).In the fourth section, it will illustrate the impacts on the national law of EU member states by the decisions from European Court of Justice. Council of ministers is composed of ministers from member states’ government. In fact , there are up

1293). Bosman also took legal action against UEFA, the European Football Association, to the European Court of Justice in an attempt to invalidate UEFA’s “gentlemen’s agreement”. The gentlemen’s agreement, also known as the 3-plus-2 rule, allowed domestic leagues to set their own maximum number of foreign players that a particular club

“The Court of Justice of the European Union and the General Court are the judicial arms of the EU”. Critically analyse with reference to the function, personnel and procedures of these two EU courts. Since the UK joined the EU in 1973 under Edward Heath the UK legal system has been inferior to the EU legal system. The EU’s main judicial arms are the Court of the Justice of the European Union (CJEU) which was established under the European Coal and Steel Community Treaty (1951) and the General Court

The Court of Justice shall consist of one judge (28 judges) from each Member State, which means that represented all the EU's national legal. The Court is assisted by eight Advocates General, whose role is to present reasoned opinions in cases brought before the Court. The judges and Advocates General are either former members of highly qualified lawyers or the highest national courts to be appointed by common accord of the governments of the EU countries for a renewable six-year term. Opinions

the civil court system, the small claims track, the fast track and the multi-track. These three tracks were formed under the Civil Procedure Act 1997 to make it easier to deal with cases of different complexity. The Act has put in place a series of checks to “sort” the cases according to size of case, the complexity of the case and the size of the compensation asked for. This is achieved through a questionnaire completed by the parties. Small Claim courts: Cases in the small claims court are heard