Juror Essay

By refusing to acknowledge the counterarguments, juror 7, inadvertently prohibited himself from listening to the other jurors, which would effectively crush the crucial link between the speaker and the receiver. In that way, one’s own prejudices blocked the way to a successful and meaningful conversation. Along with pride, prejudice

man. Juror #8 votes not guilty and pushes to have the evidence talked through. After reviewing all the evidence carefully, the tables turned from guilty to not guilty. Each juror brought different experiences and personalities to the jury room. The two that were forceful with their opinions and their reasonings to decide either way we're jurors #8 and #3. According to the book From Critical Thinking to Argument by Sylvan Barnet and Hugo Bedau, the term critical thinking means checking

Introduction 1 Juror #1 1 Juror #2 1 Juror #3 1 Juror #4 2 Juror #5 2 Juror #6 2 Juror #7 3 Juror #8 3 Juror #9 4 Juror #10 4 Juror #11 4 Juror #12 4 Conclusion 5 Introduction “12 Angry Men”, the movie that is revolved around the trial of the murder case, has different characters from different backgrounds as the jurors. In this report, the communication styles of those people are going to be discussed. They are examined based on their behaviours, languages or gestures. Juror #1 Among all the Jurors, juror

defendant. Persuasion Henry Fonda, plays the role of juror number eight, who from the beginning keeps his conviction that the defendant is not guilty due to reasonable doubt. Fonda uses arguments and reasoning to convince the other jurors to deliver a not-guilty verdict. For each witness testimony, Fonda was able to raise doubt, like the L-train causing enough noise that the elderly neighbor would be unable to hear the father and son argue. As more jurors, changed their verdict to not-guilty, they took

as more transformational or charismatic. Ways in which juror number 11 demonstrated idealized influence: “A refugee from Europe who had come to this country in 1941. A man who speaks with an accent and who is ashamed, humble, almost subservient to the people around him, but who will honestly seek justice because he has suffered through so much injustice.” https://docs.google.com/document/d/1irVXTuMAQESSwtoqOtQiC_-5dZa59LCmOxA_IQzlxww/edit Juror 11 is a refugee from Europe. He is a watchmaker who

the end of this film. The jurors in this film each had their own personality and creative background in their lives creating a mess in the juror room. Two distinct jurors popped out to me while watching this film. These two jurors who were more different than each other could ever be reminded me of certain characteristics that I could relate to. Juror number one who was the high school coach with a vary laid back attitude towards the actions of the room was the first juror who I could relate to. Almost

The first juror that will be discussed is juror 7. Juror 7’s personality is impatient which is highlighted in the story when he is in a hurry about the case, “Right. This better be fast. I’ve got ticket to the Seven Year Itch tonight” (313-314 Act 1). The quote shows that Juror 7’s priority is not the case, but a baseball game representing his personality of impatient. The readers also see that seven does not care about the case. For instance, in the story when he tells all the jurors he wants to

by his friends and it was also the same blade used to kill his father. This is the facts presented by the prosecution, the ‘truth’. This truth is wavered when the 8th juror brings out a blade exactly the same as the one as the one the boy had. It is interesting as the shopkeeper stated that it was rare and unusual yet, the 8th juror brought the same one from a pawn shop near the boy’s house. This contradiction therefore questions the credibility of the shopkeeper’s accounts and brings a shadow of

beings in New York City in a jury room, there are 12 jurors and each of them seem very flustered, not only because its hot and the fan won’t work, but because the trial seems to almost be a waste of time for these twelve people. We learn the case they are dealing with is between a son and his father; the son supposedly stabbed and killed his father. The father and the son live near the slums which is where colored people live. Almost

INTRODUCTION The HealthSouth Corporation was started in 1984 by Richard Scrushy with hopes of becoming one of the largest healthcare companies in the country. It was doing quite well by 1996 with a market value of nearly $12 billion and was one of the United States largest healthcare firms. This all fell apart in 2003 when it was discovered that Scrushy and his employees had committed fraud in the estimated range of almost $2.7 billion (Daigle, Louwers and Morris 887). Scrushy, over the years