Corpus Distribution

.pdf

School

Liberty University *

*We aren’t endorsed by this school

Course

614

Subject

Accounting

Date

Feb 20, 2024

Type

pdf

Pages

7

Uploaded by KidRatMaster654

Report
CASE STUDY: CORPUS DISTRIBUTION 1 Case Study: Corpus Distribution ACCT 614 MS: Accounting: Taxation, Liberty University August 13, 2023 Author Note I have no known conflict of interest to disclose. Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to
2 Summary The Shipman family has a tradition of sending their children to Yale University to receive an education that would prepare them for successful careers in their chosen fields. Amy's late grandmother, Wilma Shipman, established the Wilma Shipman Trust in the 1950s, and since then, it has amassed a sizeable corpus of assets. It only distributes dividends to Wilma's descendants on rare occasions and only when those descendants have significant financial needs. For instance, the trust sent $500,000 to Jonathan Shipman two years ago so that he might use it to assist him in launching a legal firm specializing in retirement and elder law. The family usually gives all the revenue from the trust to a single charitable organization. According to the trust rules, Amy's uncle and legal guardian, Leonard Shipman, can name the trust beneficiaries and the amounts to give each person. He also can replace the trustee and choose the organization to donate to at the end of the year. The grantor trusts regulations of section 678 govern the trust, and Leonard is responsible for reporting the transactions associated with the trust on his Form 1040. Amy has shown an interest in attending the prominent local Preparatory High School; however, the total tuition and fees for four years are about $80,000, which must be paid in advance. She negotiates with the trustee of the Wilma Shipman estate and asks for the distribution of this sum in the current year to be made payable straight to the Academy. Per the state's regulations, the parent or legal guardian must ensure that their child receives a free education in the public school system until age 16. If they make the payment to the Academy, how does it comply with the regulations of Subchapter J? Does it count as a charity contribution to the Academy? Does it count as a corpus distribution to Amy? Or does it count as something else entirely?
3 Case Study: Corpus Distribution The Shipman Family Case Study findings show that Amy tried to negotiate with the trustee of Wilma Shipman's estate and requested that the distribution of a sum in the current year be made payable directly to the Academy. Until 16 years, their child is eligible for free education in the public school system. The state requires the parent or legal guardian to take responsibility for the child's education. Cornell Law School (n.d) discusses payment being made payable to beneficiaries. When determining the amount of an estate or trust's taxable income, the total of the following can be deducted under section 661(a) as a deduction for payments made to beneficiaries: The income from the previous year's tax year needs to be dispersed currently, and any other monies that have been lawfully paid or credited or need to be disbursed for such a tax year. Also, the word "income required to be distributed" includes any amount that needs to be given out. This amount can come from either income or the corpus, like an annuity, if it comes from income for the taxable year. It also includes any amount that must be paid from the income or the capital. Section 1.651(a)–2 explained how to figure out if the income of an estate or trust needs to be given out right now based on many factors. McCouch (2021) says that under the Uniform Transfers to Minors Act, gifts to minors often take the form of a statute custodianship. Custodianship is a simple and easy option for giving property outright or putting it in a trust for a minor beneficiary. It avoids the need for a court-appointed guardian and the cost and formality of express trust. There are different ways to give gifts to children, and each has pros and cons. Previously, donors had to choose between making a direct gift to a minor (which often required a court-appointed guardian to take care of the property while the minor was still a child) or putting property in trust for a minor beneficiary.
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help