Section 14
.pdf
keyboard_arrow_up
School
St. Petersburg College *
*We aren’t endorsed by this school
Course
1107
Subject
Economics
Date
May 1, 2024
Type
Pages
12
Uploaded by BailiffResolve14197
MGF1107: Section 14.2 Flaws of Voting In the previous section, we learned about four voting methods. We also discovered that the four methods can produce the same winner or different winners. So, although the methods appear to provide reasonable ways to determine winners, there are flaws with each method. Mathematicians and political scientists have agreed that a voting method should meet the following four fairness criteria
in order for the voting method to be considered fair. The Head-to-Head criterion is also known as the Condorcet criterion
. This criterion is named after the Marquis de Condorcet. The Marquis de Condorcet (1743-1794) was one of the most influential mathematicians during the American and French revolutions. He discovered, much to his disappointment that occasionally there can be no clear and fair way to declare the winner of an election. (
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marquis_de_Condorcet ) All from etext pages 900-905 Example: Applying the majority criterion
The members of the Fayetteville Town Board are holding an election to select a company to maintain the property at the town park. The choices are Green World Landscaping (G), Lawn and Garden Haven (L), and Jubilant Gardens (J). The 13 board members rank the three choices use the Borda count method to make their selection. The preference table is shown below.
from etext page 900
The Borda count method resulted in Lawn and Garden Haven being selected. Does the winner have a majority of first-place votes? Is the majority criterion satisfied? Solution:
Lawn and Garden has 6 out of 13 first place votes, which is less than 50%. So the winner of the election, Lawn and Garden Have does not have a majority of the first-place votes. In fact, a majority of the town board members, 7 out of 13, selected Green World Landscaping. Therefore, the Majority criterion is not satisfied. This example demonstrates that the Borda count method has the potential to violate the Majority criterion. Example:
The preference table below shows the outcomes of 33 votes. Decide which candidate would be chosen with each of the following voting methods. Also discuss whether or not the method violates the majority criterion. from etext page 900
a.
Plurality method The plurality method awards the election to A since it received the most votes for first place: 17 out of 33 total votes cast. This is also a majority (51.5%). The majority criterion states the candidate with the majority of first place votes must win. In general, a candidate who holds a majority of the first-place votes also holds a plurality of first-place votes. Therefore
, the plurality method never violates the majority criterion. However, this does not mean that the plurality method always produces a winner with a majority of the votes.
b.
Borda count method Each first place vote is worth 3 points, 2
nd
place vote 2 points and 3
rd
place 1 point. Candidate A: (17 x 3) + (16 x 1) = 67 points Candidate B: (9 x 3) + (24 x 2) = 75 points Candidate C: (7 x 3) + (9 x 2) + (17 x 1) = 56 points Candidate B wins using the Borda count method. Since candidate A holds a majority of the first place votes, this method violates the majority criterion. The Borda count method has the potential for violating the majority criterion.
It does not violate in every case but the potential is there. c.
Plurality with elimination This method awards the election to Candidate A since this candidate received the majority of the first place votes. No elimination of candidates is needed. In general, a candidate who holds a majority of first-place votes is awarded the election without having to hold a second election, or without having to consider eliminating a candidate and re-
aligning voters’ choices.
Therefore, the plurality with elimination method never violates the majority criterion. d.
Pairwise comparison method There are 3 candidates so there are 3(2)/2 = 3 comparisons Candidate A vs. Candidate B
Candidate A: 17 votes Candidate B: 9 + 7 = 16 votes Candidate A gets one point Candidate A vs. Candidate C Candidate A: 17 points Candidate B: 9+7 = 16 points Candidate A gets one point Candidate B vs. Candidate C Candidate B: 17 + 9 = 26 points Candidate C: 7 points Candidate B gets one point Totals: Candidate A: 2 points Candidate B: 1 points Candidate C: 0 points
This method awards the election to candidate A. In general, if a candidate holds a majority of the first place votes, this candidate always wins every pairwise comparison. Thus, the pairwise comparison method never violates the majority criterion. Of the four methods, only the Borda count method can violate the majority criterion. Example: Applying the head to head criterion Suppose that four candidates [Alvarez (A), Buchannan (B), Czechanski (C), and Davis (D)] are running for mayor of Springwater. The election involves ranking the candidates with the results shown below: from etext page 902
a.
Is there one candidate who is favored over all others using a head-to-head comparison? 4 candidates so 4(3)/2 = 6 comparisons Alvarez vs. Buchannan: Alvarez: 129 + 90 = 219 votes Buchanan: 87 + 78 + 42 = 207 votes Alvarez wins Alvarez vs. Czechanski: Alvarez: 129 + 90 = 219 points Czechanski: 87 + 78 + 42 = 207 votes Alvarez wins Alvarez vs. Davis: Alvarez: 90 + 87 + 42 = 219 votes Davis: 129 + 78 = 207 votes Alvarez wins Buchannan vs. Czechanski: Buchannan: 129 + 87 = 216 votes Czechanski:
90+ 78 + 42 = 210 votes Buchannan wins Buchannan vs. Davis: Buchannan: 90 + 87 + 78 + 42 = 297 votes Davis: 129 votes Buchannan wins Czechanski vs. Davis: Czechanski:
90+ 87 + 78 + 42 = 297 votes Davis: 129 votes Czechanski wins
Summary: Alvarez is favored over all others. b.
Who wins the election if the plurality method is used? Does this result violate the head-to-head criterion? Using the plurality method, Davis wins because he received 129 first-place votes. Therefore, this result violates the head-to-head comparison. This example demonstrates that the plurality method has the potential to violate the head-to-head criterion. c.
Who wins if the Borda count method is used? Does this result violate the head-to-
head criterion? There are four candidates so first-place is 4 points, second place 3 points, etc. Alvarez: (3 x 129) + (4 x 90) + (2 x 87) + (1 x 78) + (2 x 42) = 1083 Buchannan: (2 x 129) + (2 x 90) + (4 x 87) + (3 x 78) + (3 x 42) = 1146 Czechanski: (1 x 129) + (3 x 90) + (3 x 87) + (4 x 78) + (4 x 42) = 1140 Davis: (4 x 129) + (1 x 90) + (1 x 87) + (2 x 78) + (1 x 42) = 891 Buchannan is elected. Therefore, this result violates the head-to-head criterion. This example demonstrates that the Borda count method has the potential to violate the head-to-head criterion. d.
Who wins if the plurality with elimination method is used? Does this result violate the head-to-head criterion? Using the plurality with elimination method, Buchannan is eliminated in the first round. The preference table is updated below: # of votes 129 90 87 78 42 1
st
D A C C C 2
ND
A C A D A 3
RD
C D D A D Now Alvarez has 90 first place votes, Czechanski has 207 and Davis has 129; Alvarez is eliminated. The updated preference table is shown below: # of votes 129 90 87 78 42 1
st
D C C C C 2
ND
C D D D D
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help
Related Questions
Exercise 1.12. Consider the following game. There is a club with three members:
Ann, Bob and Carla. They have to choose which of the three is going to be
president next year. Currently Ann is the president. Each member is both a
candidate and a voter. Voting is as follows: each member votes for one candidate
(voting for oneself is allowed); if two or more people vote for the same candidate
then that person is chosen as the next president; if there is complete disagreement,
in the sense that there is exactly one vote for each candidate, then the person from
whom Ann voted is selected as the next president.
(a) Represent this voting procedure as a game frame, indicating inside each cell of
each table which candidate is elected.
(b) Assume that the players' preferences are as follows: AnnAm Carla Ann Bob,
Carla Bob Ann, Bob Carla Ann Caria
Carla.
Using utility values 0, 1 and 2, convert the game frame into a game.
(c) Apply the IDWDS to the game of part (b). Is there a weak iterated…
arrow_forward
Kskskdkd
arrow_forward
On July 1, 1965, the federal ad valorem taxes on many goods and services were eliminated. Comparing prices before
and after this change, we can determine how much the price fell in response to the tax's elimination. Given an ad
valorem tax of v, the tax collected on a good that sold for p was vp. If the price fell by vp when the tax was eliminated,
consumers must have been bearing the full incidence of the tax. Consequently, consumers got the full benefit of
removing the tax from those goods. The entire amount of the tax cut was passed on to consumers for all commodities
and services that were studied for which the taxes were collected at the retail level (except admissions and club dues)
and for most commodities for which excise taxes were imposed at the manufacturer level, including face powder, sterling
silverware, wristwatches, and handbags (Brownlee and Perry, 1967). List the conditions (in terms of the elasticities or
shapes of supply or demand curves) that are consistent with…
arrow_forward
Suppose that some members of a population are infected with a sexually transmitted virus that causes disease X, and some are infected with another sexually transmitted virus that causes disease Y. Some members of the population may be infected with both viruses. While diseases X and Y are similar in that they are both sexually transmitted diseases, the disease X is much more harmful to its carriers than the disease Y is to its carriers. Condom use is highly effective in preventing the transmission of either disease. Suppose scientists discover a cure for the sexually transmitted disease X. This cure (a vaccination) will eliminate the virus causing the disease X from its carrier before its carrier can suffer any harm from the virus. Everybody is immediately given this vaccination against the disease X. a. What do you expect to happen to the prevalence of the virus causing the disease X in the population? Draw a graph with time on the horizontal axis and prevalence of the virus causing…
arrow_forward
Suppose that some members of a population are infected with a sexually transmitted virus that causes disease X, and some are infected with another sexually transmitted virus that causes disease Y. Some members of the population may be infected with both viruses. While diseases X and Y are similar in that they are both sexually transmitted diseases, the disease X is much more harmful to its carriers than the disease Y is to its carriers. Condom use is highly effective in preventing the transmission of either disease. Suppose scientists discover a cure for the sexually transmitted disease X. This cure (a vaccination) will eliminate the virus causing the disease X from its carrier before its carrier can suffer any harm from the virus. Everybody is immediately given this vaccination against the disease X.
What do you expect to happen to the rate of condom use in the population over time? Add a curve for the rate of condom use to your graph.
arrow_forward
Explanation with answer
arrow_forward
The climate policy toolkit has, to-date, mostly focused on demand side policies (i.e. policies that affect the pollution demand curve), some of which are ‘command-and control’ and others are market based (e.g. cap-and-trade schemes, carbon taxes).
Suppose the government decided to issue tradeable permits for a certain form of pollution, does it matter for economic efficiency whether the government allocates the permits to firms or whether it auctions them off? Why or why not?
arrow_forward
Let's call a committee of three people a "consumer." (Groups of people often
act together as "consumers.") Our committee makes decisions using majority
voting. When the committee members compare two alternatives, x and y,
they simply take a vote, and the winner is said to be "preferred" by the
committee to the loser. Suppose that the preferences of the individuals are as
follows: Person 1 likes x best, y second best, and z third best. We write this in
the following way: Person 1: x, y, z. Assume the preferences of the other two
people are: Person 2: y, z, x; and Person 3 : z, x, y. Show that in this
example the committee preferences produced by majority voting violate
transitivity. (This is the famous "voting paradox" first described by the French
philosopher and mathematician Marquis de Condorcet (1743–1794).)
arrow_forward
Question 4: Suppose that scientists develop a way to cross tomatoes and potatoes
into a new super veggie (after much debate over whether it would be called a totato
or a pomato, the latter name won). There are only 6 consumers in the world that
would even consider buying a pomato, each of whom wants just one, and so the
scientists ask these 6 consumers how much they will pay (WTP) for one pomato.
The consumers respond (truthfully)
Consumer VWTP
Alex
7
Ben
16
Carrie
14
Dan
24
Ellie
8
Frances
10
(1) Draw the market demand curve for pomatoes
(2) Suppose the price of pomatoes is p= 10. What is the consumers' surplus?
(3) If the price increases to p
16, what is the loss in consumer surplus? How
much of this is due to fewer pomatoes being sold and how much is due to the
higher price of pomatoes on the units that are sold?
arrow_forward
The town of Fenerbahce has hired world‐class econometricians to investigate their criminal justice system. The researchers report an interesting finding. People who were previously detected and punished by law enforcers gain a better understanding of the functioning of the law enforcement system, and are better able to exploit laws designed to protect defendants against the state. Thus, people who have been detected and punished before are better able to avoid detection and punishment. In particular, theyreport the following facts:
‐ The offense of jay‐walking causes social harm of $100.‐ A person who has never been punished for jaywalking before faces a 0.5probability of being detected while jaywalking.‐ A person who has been punished before for jaywalking faces a probability of0.25 of being detected while jaywalking.
The town wants to implement optimal punishment schemes. It is well known thateveryone in Fenerbahce is risk‐neutral and rich (i.e. not judgment proof). Moreover, the…
arrow_forward
Ten years ago, the town of Easton decided to increase its annual spending on education so that its high school graduates would be able to earn higher wages. Now Easton has asked you to evaluate the effectiveness of the spending increase. Their data show that before the spending increase, the average annual salary of recent high school graduates was $25,000 and that now that average salary has risen to $28,500. Fortunately for your analysis, a neighboring community (Allentown) did not change its annual spending on education. Ten years ago, recent Allentown high school graduates earned an average of $22,500, and now that average is $23,750.
(a) Use a difference-in-differences estimator to determine whether Easton’s spending increase caused the wages of their high school graduates to increase.
(b) What underlying assumption do you have to make in order for your estimate to be valid? What might cause your underlying assumption to be invalid?
(c) This data set contains only two…
arrow_forward
For questions 44 and 45 consider the following:
The town of Fenerbahce has hired world-class econometricians to investigate their criminal justice system. The researchers report an interesting finding. People who were previously detected and punished by law enforcers gain a better understanding of the functioning of the law enforcement system, and are better able to exploit laws designed to protect defendants against the state. Thus, people who have been detected and punished before are better able to avoid detection and punishment. In particular, they report the following facts:
The offense of jay-walking causes social harm of $100.
A person who has never been punished for jaywalking before faces a 0.5 probability of being detected while jaywalking.
A person who has been punished before for jaywalking faces a probability of 0.25 of being detected while jaywalking.
The town wants to implement optimal punishment schemes. It is well known that everyone in Fenerbahce is risk-neutral and…
arrow_forward
please help me with this question ASAP
arrow_forward
Suppose there are two types of persons: high-ability and low-ability. Firms wish to use education as a screening device where they intend to pay $25,000 to workers without a diploma and $35,000 to those with a diploma. Assume it costs $8,000 of for a high-ability person to obtain a diploma. If is cost $10,000 for a low-ability person to obtain a diploma, can the firm use diploma to screen low ability from high ability worker. Explain and support your answer using math. How would your answer change it the cost of obtaining a diploma for a low productivity person were to increase to $15,000.
arrow_forward
The
following is an excerpt describing the Oregon Medicaid lottery:
In 2008, Oregon implemented a limited expansion of its Medicaid program for low-income adults
through a lottery, selecting names from a waiting list to fill a limited number of available spots. Those
selected had the opportunity to apply for Medicaid and to enroll if they met eligibility requirements.
Based on the description, you might describe the Oregon Medicaid lottery as a:
randomized experiment
"As if random" natural experiment
a true natural experiment
arrow_forward
The Forest Service is responsible for maintaining our commons forests, and controlling responsible
access and safe usage of forest campsites and trails by the public. Currently, the forest service is
trying to decide whether to increase the resources devoted to thinning parts of the forest in Eastern
Washington so as to reduce the risk of wildfıres.
They thus took a survey of Washington Residents to see how much they would be willing to to pay
in order to have better air quality and fewer wildfires. The results of the survey would be used by
the government in making budgetary decisions about tax collection and revenue allocation for forest
management.
How much
How much
How much
would you be would you be would you be
willing to pay willing to pay willing to pay
PERSON
to reduce the to reduce the to reduce the
risk of forest risk of forest risk of forest
fıres by 10% fires by 30% fires by 50%
50
50
30
Amy
20
20
Brian
20
15
10
Catherine
50
40
30
David
20
arrow_forward
John and Sotiris live on trees in two different forests. They each have eight hours to work in a day. John can grow a Yam in 1 hour or raise a Zebra in 2 hours. Sotiris can grow a Yam in 2 hours or raise a Zebra in 4 hours. Both John and Sotiris consume equal numbers of Yams and Zebras.
When calculating the welfare benefits of markets, the standard analysis only includes the parties involved in exchange. Using the American Opioid Crisis as an example, explain how poorly regulated markets can cause harm to third parties not involved in exchange.
arrow_forward
Due to an increased number of patients seeking COVID-19 tests and counseling, the clinic and the counseling centre at the leading public hospital was converted to provide both health screening services and counseling services. Using all of its staff, the clinic can screen a maximum of 10 clients or it can counsel 6 clients. Using all of its staff, the counseling centre can screen a maximum of 6 clients or counsel 12 clients.
Who has the absolute advantage in health screening?
Who has the absolute advantage in counseling services?
Who has a comparative advantage in health screening?
Who has a comparative advantage in counseling services?
What is the opportunity cost of counseling services?
arrow_forward
Dislike will be given
arrow_forward
Answer only 2 out of the 4 questions!
arrow_forward
What is the difference between Pareto efficiency and Hicks-Kaldor efficiency, and why is it relevant to benefit cost analysis?
arrow_forward
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
Recommended textbooks for you
Principles of Economics (12th Edition)
Economics
ISBN:9780134078779
Author:Karl E. Case, Ray C. Fair, Sharon E. Oster
Publisher:PEARSON
Engineering Economy (17th Edition)
Economics
ISBN:9780134870069
Author:William G. Sullivan, Elin M. Wicks, C. Patrick Koelling
Publisher:PEARSON
Principles of Economics (MindTap Course List)
Economics
ISBN:9781305585126
Author:N. Gregory Mankiw
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Managerial Economics: A Problem Solving Approach
Economics
ISBN:9781337106665
Author:Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike Shor
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Managerial Economics & Business Strategy (Mcgraw-...
Economics
ISBN:9781259290619
Author:Michael Baye, Jeff Prince
Publisher:McGraw-Hill Education
Related Questions
- Exercise 1.12. Consider the following game. There is a club with three members: Ann, Bob and Carla. They have to choose which of the three is going to be president next year. Currently Ann is the president. Each member is both a candidate and a voter. Voting is as follows: each member votes for one candidate (voting for oneself is allowed); if two or more people vote for the same candidate then that person is chosen as the next president; if there is complete disagreement, in the sense that there is exactly one vote for each candidate, then the person from whom Ann voted is selected as the next president. (a) Represent this voting procedure as a game frame, indicating inside each cell of each table which candidate is elected. (b) Assume that the players' preferences are as follows: AnnAm Carla Ann Bob, Carla Bob Ann, Bob Carla Ann Caria Carla. Using utility values 0, 1 and 2, convert the game frame into a game. (c) Apply the IDWDS to the game of part (b). Is there a weak iterated…arrow_forwardKskskdkdarrow_forwardOn July 1, 1965, the federal ad valorem taxes on many goods and services were eliminated. Comparing prices before and after this change, we can determine how much the price fell in response to the tax's elimination. Given an ad valorem tax of v, the tax collected on a good that sold for p was vp. If the price fell by vp when the tax was eliminated, consumers must have been bearing the full incidence of the tax. Consequently, consumers got the full benefit of removing the tax from those goods. The entire amount of the tax cut was passed on to consumers for all commodities and services that were studied for which the taxes were collected at the retail level (except admissions and club dues) and for most commodities for which excise taxes were imposed at the manufacturer level, including face powder, sterling silverware, wristwatches, and handbags (Brownlee and Perry, 1967). List the conditions (in terms of the elasticities or shapes of supply or demand curves) that are consistent with…arrow_forward
- Suppose that some members of a population are infected with a sexually transmitted virus that causes disease X, and some are infected with another sexually transmitted virus that causes disease Y. Some members of the population may be infected with both viruses. While diseases X and Y are similar in that they are both sexually transmitted diseases, the disease X is much more harmful to its carriers than the disease Y is to its carriers. Condom use is highly effective in preventing the transmission of either disease. Suppose scientists discover a cure for the sexually transmitted disease X. This cure (a vaccination) will eliminate the virus causing the disease X from its carrier before its carrier can suffer any harm from the virus. Everybody is immediately given this vaccination against the disease X. a. What do you expect to happen to the prevalence of the virus causing the disease X in the population? Draw a graph with time on the horizontal axis and prevalence of the virus causing…arrow_forwardSuppose that some members of a population are infected with a sexually transmitted virus that causes disease X, and some are infected with another sexually transmitted virus that causes disease Y. Some members of the population may be infected with both viruses. While diseases X and Y are similar in that they are both sexually transmitted diseases, the disease X is much more harmful to its carriers than the disease Y is to its carriers. Condom use is highly effective in preventing the transmission of either disease. Suppose scientists discover a cure for the sexually transmitted disease X. This cure (a vaccination) will eliminate the virus causing the disease X from its carrier before its carrier can suffer any harm from the virus. Everybody is immediately given this vaccination against the disease X. What do you expect to happen to the rate of condom use in the population over time? Add a curve for the rate of condom use to your graph.arrow_forwardExplanation with answerarrow_forward
- The climate policy toolkit has, to-date, mostly focused on demand side policies (i.e. policies that affect the pollution demand curve), some of which are ‘command-and control’ and others are market based (e.g. cap-and-trade schemes, carbon taxes). Suppose the government decided to issue tradeable permits for a certain form of pollution, does it matter for economic efficiency whether the government allocates the permits to firms or whether it auctions them off? Why or why not?arrow_forwardLet's call a committee of three people a "consumer." (Groups of people often act together as "consumers.") Our committee makes decisions using majority voting. When the committee members compare two alternatives, x and y, they simply take a vote, and the winner is said to be "preferred" by the committee to the loser. Suppose that the preferences of the individuals are as follows: Person 1 likes x best, y second best, and z third best. We write this in the following way: Person 1: x, y, z. Assume the preferences of the other two people are: Person 2: y, z, x; and Person 3 : z, x, y. Show that in this example the committee preferences produced by majority voting violate transitivity. (This is the famous "voting paradox" first described by the French philosopher and mathematician Marquis de Condorcet (1743–1794).)arrow_forwardQuestion 4: Suppose that scientists develop a way to cross tomatoes and potatoes into a new super veggie (after much debate over whether it would be called a totato or a pomato, the latter name won). There are only 6 consumers in the world that would even consider buying a pomato, each of whom wants just one, and so the scientists ask these 6 consumers how much they will pay (WTP) for one pomato. The consumers respond (truthfully) Consumer VWTP Alex 7 Ben 16 Carrie 14 Dan 24 Ellie 8 Frances 10 (1) Draw the market demand curve for pomatoes (2) Suppose the price of pomatoes is p= 10. What is the consumers' surplus? (3) If the price increases to p 16, what is the loss in consumer surplus? How much of this is due to fewer pomatoes being sold and how much is due to the higher price of pomatoes on the units that are sold?arrow_forward
- The town of Fenerbahce has hired world‐class econometricians to investigate their criminal justice system. The researchers report an interesting finding. People who were previously detected and punished by law enforcers gain a better understanding of the functioning of the law enforcement system, and are better able to exploit laws designed to protect defendants against the state. Thus, people who have been detected and punished before are better able to avoid detection and punishment. In particular, theyreport the following facts: ‐ The offense of jay‐walking causes social harm of $100.‐ A person who has never been punished for jaywalking before faces a 0.5probability of being detected while jaywalking.‐ A person who has been punished before for jaywalking faces a probability of0.25 of being detected while jaywalking. The town wants to implement optimal punishment schemes. It is well known thateveryone in Fenerbahce is risk‐neutral and rich (i.e. not judgment proof). Moreover, the…arrow_forwardTen years ago, the town of Easton decided to increase its annual spending on education so that its high school graduates would be able to earn higher wages. Now Easton has asked you to evaluate the effectiveness of the spending increase. Their data show that before the spending increase, the average annual salary of recent high school graduates was $25,000 and that now that average salary has risen to $28,500. Fortunately for your analysis, a neighboring community (Allentown) did not change its annual spending on education. Ten years ago, recent Allentown high school graduates earned an average of $22,500, and now that average is $23,750. (a) Use a difference-in-differences estimator to determine whether Easton’s spending increase caused the wages of their high school graduates to increase. (b) What underlying assumption do you have to make in order for your estimate to be valid? What might cause your underlying assumption to be invalid? (c) This data set contains only two…arrow_forwardFor questions 44 and 45 consider the following: The town of Fenerbahce has hired world-class econometricians to investigate their criminal justice system. The researchers report an interesting finding. People who were previously detected and punished by law enforcers gain a better understanding of the functioning of the law enforcement system, and are better able to exploit laws designed to protect defendants against the state. Thus, people who have been detected and punished before are better able to avoid detection and punishment. In particular, they report the following facts: The offense of jay-walking causes social harm of $100. A person who has never been punished for jaywalking before faces a 0.5 probability of being detected while jaywalking. A person who has been punished before for jaywalking faces a probability of 0.25 of being detected while jaywalking. The town wants to implement optimal punishment schemes. It is well known that everyone in Fenerbahce is risk-neutral and…arrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
- Principles of Economics (12th Edition)EconomicsISBN:9780134078779Author:Karl E. Case, Ray C. Fair, Sharon E. OsterPublisher:PEARSONEngineering Economy (17th Edition)EconomicsISBN:9780134870069Author:William G. Sullivan, Elin M. Wicks, C. Patrick KoellingPublisher:PEARSON
- Principles of Economics (MindTap Course List)EconomicsISBN:9781305585126Author:N. Gregory MankiwPublisher:Cengage LearningManagerial Economics: A Problem Solving ApproachEconomicsISBN:9781337106665Author:Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike ShorPublisher:Cengage LearningManagerial Economics & Business Strategy (Mcgraw-...EconomicsISBN:9781259290619Author:Michael Baye, Jeff PrincePublisher:McGraw-Hill Education
Principles of Economics (12th Edition)
Economics
ISBN:9780134078779
Author:Karl E. Case, Ray C. Fair, Sharon E. Oster
Publisher:PEARSON
Engineering Economy (17th Edition)
Economics
ISBN:9780134870069
Author:William G. Sullivan, Elin M. Wicks, C. Patrick Koelling
Publisher:PEARSON
Principles of Economics (MindTap Course List)
Economics
ISBN:9781305585126
Author:N. Gregory Mankiw
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Managerial Economics: A Problem Solving Approach
Economics
ISBN:9781337106665
Author:Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike Shor
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Managerial Economics & Business Strategy (Mcgraw-...
Economics
ISBN:9781259290619
Author:Michael Baye, Jeff Prince
Publisher:McGraw-Hill Education