Week 7 discussion

.docx

School

De Anza College *

*We aren’t endorsed by this school

Course

604

Subject

Economics

Date

Jan 9, 2024

Type

docx

Pages

2

Uploaded by BrigadierWaterWaterBuffalo161

Report
On which side of the 'right to work' law debate do you fall? Do they rightfully protect worker interests, or are they a corrupt strategy to destroy collective bargaining? Is your state a 'right to work' state? Keeping your answer to this question in context, how influential are the unions which operate in your state's major industries? Hello class, According to the National Conference of State Legislatures, there are 27 states that have passed right to work laws, giving employees the choice to of whether to join a union. Right to work laws in these states prohibit contracts that require workers to join a labor union to get or keep a job. Unions still operate in those states, but workers cannot be forced into membership as a requirement of their job. However, Robert Reich mentions four reasons that “right to work” law affects the workers negatively in his short video “Why “Right to Work” is Wrong for Workers”. Those reasons are that it hurts workers; it destroys unions; it is sponsored by corporations, and it attracts businesses that pay less. I fall to the Robert Reich’s side. Right to work laws offer no protection or economic benefits for workers. According to the studies of Shierholz and Gould, these laws drive down wages for all workers, including non-union members, women, and people of color, and workers in right to work states are less likely to have health insurance. The Bureau of Labor Statistics reports that the rate of workplace deaths is 52.9% in states with this right to work for less laws. Women workers in unions earn $212 more each week, 34 percent more than nonunion women. Union membership narrows the pay gap between men and women from 19.8 percent nationwide to 12.2 percent. African American workers in unions earn 29 percent more each week ($168) than nonunion African American workers. My home state is California, and it is not a “right to work” state. In 2016, California became the first state in the country to pass a $15 minimum wage. California was the second state in the country, after Connecticut, to pass three paid sick days per year law. In 2012, California established the Secure Choice Retirement Savings Program, to begin tackling the ever-growing retirement savings crisis, and in 2016 authorized its implementation. California’s unions have had large impact on working families regardless of union status through their engagement in public policy. References: Hiltz, A. (n.d.). Right-to-work resources . Right to Work Laws. Retrieved October 14, 2022, from https://www.ncsl.org/research/labor-and-employment/right-to-work-laws-and-bills.aspx Shierholz, H., & Gould, E. (2011, February 17). The compensation penalty of "right-to-work" laws . Economic Policy Institute. Retrieved October 14, 2022, from https://www.epi.org/publication/bp299/ Hello Jessica, Thank you for sharing your experience about your previous workplaces. Right to work laws vary from state to state and may also differ if the job is in the private sector or the public sector. Currently 27 states have right to work laws in place and advocates of right to work laws state that the laws allow employees to choose whether they would like to join a union or not making unions more accountable
since members can quit if they are not satisfied with how the union works. Rober Reich said that “right to work” laws affect the workers negatively. According to the National Policy Institute in 2015, people from non- right to work states earned almost 16% more and pension rates were 5% lower than those employees in right to work states. What do you think about this? Hello Laura, Thank you for sharing your post. We are all the same side. I am not in prefer of the “right to work” at all. Workers in right-to-work laws earn lower wages. Lower wages decrease consumer demand, resulting in fewer jobs. For example, Oklahoma lost one-third of its manufacturing jobs after the state passed a right-to-work law. Workers in right-to-work states are less likely to have health insurance. Right-to-work laws undermine unions. In my previous experience job, all unionid employees keep talking to Union every time they have issues with their supervisors; for example, the supervisors are unfair on doing the roster. But I am not against the right to work states.; they still have the advantages, and the laws allow employees to choose whether they would like to join a union or not making unions more accountable since members can quit if they are not satisfied with how the union works.
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help